When you see G7+9 in a lead sheet does that mean G7 with the 9th (A)? Or does it mean G7 with the sharp 9th (A#)? Just curious, cause I have seen many variations (G7(9) G7(#9) G7 9). I need to know this.
Thanks,
Mike

Hi Mike,
Usually the + means the note it preceeds is rasied (A#).
Mike

That's what I assumed, but was never sure. Thanks.

MOOSE THE MOOCH,

This is a great subject. While what PMS told you was absolutely correct, there's more to the story than that. Typically, just about any dominant chord that has an altered 9th (raised or lowered) is open for substitution with a Dominant chord with the opposite type of altered 9th. i.e. - if you see a G7#9, most of the time a G7b9 will also work in the same spot. If I wasn't holding a fussy infant at the moment and typing with one hand, I'd go into more detail. As is, I'll have to try again later when the tragedy has died down a bit. :rolleyes: :D

Originally posted by Chris Fitzgerald
MOOSE THE MOOCH,

This is a great subject. While what PMS told you was absolutely correct, there's more to the story than that. Typically, just about any dominant chord that has an altered 9th (raised or lowered) is open for substitution with a Dominant chord with the opposite type of altered 9th. i.e. - if you see a G7#9, most of the time a G7b9 will also work in the same spot. If I wasn't holding a fussy infant at the moment and typing with one hand, I'd go into more detail. As is, I'll have to try again later when the tragedy has died down a bit. :rolleyes: :D

Time to bust out the bass for a little solo "There Is No Greater Love" work.

...just about any dominant chord ...

I've only recently come to understand how a dominant chord is spelled, but should I also understand a dominant chord as the V chord in some progression?

I would guess that Chris would relate the chord to the altered dominant scale, which is built on the 7th degree of the melodic minor scale...

the whole chord would be spelled:
R b9 #9 3 b5 b13 b7

striped down it's the Jimi Hendrix chord

expanded, it's the Scribian chord.

Yep, "Purple Haze" more specifically. Also, even more srtiped down, R b3 5 b7, it's the V chord in "Louie Louie".

R b3 5 b7, it's the V chord in "Louie Louie".

Isn't R b3 5 b7 a minor?

Originally posted by Johnny L


I've only recently come to understand how a dominant chord is spelled, but should I also understand a dominant chord as the V chord in some progression?

By definition, a dominant chord is a V chord. In the key of C Major, the dominant, or V chord, is G7. However, there is a plethora of ways to use a dominant chord so that it is not the V chord in a given key. One possibility is what's called a secondary dominant. In "Take The A Train", for example, the D7 in the 3rd bar is a secondary dominant of V, or "V7 of V".

In a typical blues, the I, IV, V, and sometimes ii chords are all dominant chords (1,3,5 b7), but each takes on the individual function in the key depending on what the root is, and only the V chord is the actual dominant.

Also, as noted in another post, a dominant chord can be minor. The derivation of the "minor v" is from the natural minor scale, wherein the flat 7th of the key is the flat 3rd of the v chord. This does not have as strong a pull to the tonic, however.

Yeah,it is. It was years before I found out it was supposed to sound like a raised 9, not a minor. By the way, if the + follows a note name, i.e., A+, the composer/copyist is usually asking for an A major triad with a raised 5, A C#, E#.

Originally posted by mike da mook
When you see G7+9 in a lead sheet does that mean G7 with the 9th (A)?

This is one example of ambiguous notation which ought not to exist. The fact that you have to question what this means is reason enough. If the intention is to notate a sharp nine chord, then it should be specifically written G7(#9). This way there is no possibility of it being misconstrued. Is it so much more effort to write a sharp sign instead of a plus sign?

The matter is further complicated when you consider that in theory, the plus sign is used to indicate an augmented triad. One might interpret G7+9 as G,B,D#,F,A. Not likely, but possible.

In the absence of standardized chordal notation, we have to be aware of the different options and use our musical intuition to decipher and decide what is meant from time to time.

Originally posted by Perplexer
I would guess that Chris would relate the chord to the altered dominant scale, which is built on the 7th degree of the melodic minor scale...

Either that or half-step/whole-step diminished, I reckon.

the whole chord would be spelled:
R b9 #9 3 b5 b13 b7

striped down it's the Jimi Hendrix chord

I'd call it the Steely Dan chord. I don't know much about Hendrix, but the "Purple Haze chord" is just a plain ol' E7#9 - whereas Steely Dan used to go for 7#5#9 quite a lot - the #5 being an important thing in defining it as 7alt chord.

Originally posted by Perplexer
I would guess that Chris would relate the chord to the altered dominant scale, which is built on the 7th degree of the melodic minor scale...

the whole chord would be spelled:
R b9 #9 3 b5 b13 b7

striped down it's the Jimi Hendrix chord

expanded, it's the Scribian chord.


Actually, I don't relate the chord to that scale except insofar as to point out to students that the "Dim/W.T." (alt.) scale and the Dim. scale are what "Common Wisdom" jazz theory recommends - what I actually play will depend on the context of the tune, and these two scales usually sound pretty "artificial" to me, especially the #4 when the resolution chord is minor. Most times, I simply play what I'm hearing at that moment, but I have noticed that when I'm hearing a #9 in any situation, I'm usually hearing the b9 as an equally valid possibility as well.

That scale/chord relation was what I was taught, though I don't use it often. As a guitarist the scale came in handy, I even wrote a tune using it in the A section. And I seem to remember it being perfect to play over a bII7 chord going into a I chord.

but I haven't found it usefull in bass soloing, it does sound artificial. And you're absolutley right, it should be in your ear, not in your theoritcial brain. the b9 I definetly hear, but I can hear the #11 as well, maybe just not in that situation.

One other thing about the chord: my classical threory friend was going on about Scribian's "mystery" chord that he had discoverd working with the overtone series. Scribian became obssesed with it enough to write a whole body of work using it I looked at it and made the connection, oh that's the Jimi chord.

I do love the chords' full construction. playing it as a two octave chord on the piano is sweet, or actually tense, but sweet.. maybe bitter sweet.

Originally posted by Purple Hazer
As a guitarist

:eek:

One other thing about the chord: my classical threory friend was going on about Scribian's "mystery" chord that he had discoverd working with the overtone series. Scribian became obssesed with it enough to write a whole body of work using it I looked at it and made the connection, oh that's the Jimi chord.


No, no - Scriabin built his chords in fourths rather than thirds - nothing to do with overtones or Hendrix!! ;)

I am absolutely WRONG!!!

that conversation must have ended up there somehow, but you're right they have no connection. Always good to dispell with misconceptions.

I now have, more ar less:

R 3 5 b7 R 9 #11

is that your Scribian chord?

But I am reading that it is based on the harmonic series, which I assume is the overtone series. Could be wrong.

Originally posted by Perplexer
I now have, more ar less:

R 3 5 b7 R 9 #11

is that your Scribian chord?


no

If I recall correctly, Scriabin's "Mystic" chord was really just a Lydian Dominant scale stacked in 4ths up from the root:

C, F#, Bb, E, A, D

I think you have to assume the presence of the 5th in the "scale", but if you are willing to do that, it's not too tough to see the relation to the overtone series. But as always (like BAD MONSOON), I could be wrong.

...a secondary dominant..."V7 of V"...

Cool. Is there some kind of cycle-of-fifths magic being displayed here too?

Originally posted by Johnny L


Cool. Is there some kind of cycle-of-fifths magic being displayed here too?

I don't know about magic, but yes, anytime you have a succession of roots wherin each root is a perfect fifth below the preceeding root, you are indeed progressing through the cycle of fifths. D,G,C,F,Bb,Eb,Ab, etc.