I'm this close to pulling the trigger on either an L-2000 or 2500.

One question - is there a noticeable difference in tone btw the rosewood and the maple boards?

I've read elsewhere that strings have more effect on the tone than the body woods, but don't know about the fretboard wood.

Anybody?

Fretboards have far less impact than even body wood. When you fret the note, the string doesn't even touch the wood between the frets unless you REALLY squeeze.

The "standard" wisdom is that maple FB's are brighter sounding and rosewood FB's are warmer sounding. I can't tell much difference, so I pretty much agree with what lug said.

Fretboards have far less impact than even body wood. When you fret the note, the string doesn't even touch the wood between the frets unless you REALLY squeeze.


+1

Exactly right. Even if you do REALLY squeeze, the last point of contact between your finger and the pickup is going to be the fret, so the FB material is irrelevant.

So its all down to aesthetics now mate!

Fretboards have far less impact than even body wood. When you fret the note, the string doesn't even touch the wood between the frets unless you REALLY squeeze.

True, but the fret is embedded in the fretboard wood, so the way it responds to the string's vibration can affect tone. Some luthiers say it makes a bigger difference than body wood, but opinions are all over the map on this. I think it makes a slight difference, but we're talking averages, i.e., some rosewood boards will sound brighter than some maple boards, even if on average maple boards have more "snap."

When I've played U.S. G&L basses, I've been impressed with the resonance of their necks with maple boards, and I generally prefer maple, so that's what I ordered on my L-1500. I'm told I have another 12 weeks to wait for it! :crying: But when it arrives...:bassist: :bassist: :bassist: !

It really depends on the kind of tone you are looking for.

I usually swear by maple but my honeyburst rosewood L1K is pretty "snappy".

Tim page of Buffalo Brothers said fretboard wood can affect the sound by 10% on an instrument.

Works for me.

Jim

If you want some extra snap, go for the ebony board.

maple.

I think it is 90% esthetics, 10% tone, I never liked a maple until I bought my G&L and now I'd never buy anything else.

I agree with Todd on the percentages, but for myself at least, I prefer the darker look of Rosewood and Ebony boards.

I agree with Todd on the percentages, but for myself at least, I prefer the darker look of Rosewood and Ebony boards.

I'd agree with this, on both points... FB wood does make a diff, but not so much as you may think. But, darker wooded FB's look sweet!

Interestingly, i think much of what I perceive, might actually be FEEL, instead of tone alteration.

I'd agree with this, on both points... FB wood does make a diff, but not so much as you may think. But, darker wooded FB's look sweet!

Interestingly, i think much of what I perceive, might actually be FEEL, instead of tone alteration.
I agree. The Maple boards feel different to me than Rosewood ones. Not that they are worse or better...just different. For what it's worth, I'm really diggin' the look of the gun oil tint maple necks and fret boards. Does the gun oil make them feel any different or is it just looks?

Does the gun oil make them feel any different or is it just looks?

GOT, gun oil tint, is always a glossy finish not satin.

Jim

For what it's worth, I'm really diggin' the look of the gun oil tint maple necks and fret boards. Does the gun oil make them feel any different or is it just looks?

Yes, they are gloss, which definitely feels different from satin. Sometimes sweaty hands will stick to gloss, so I avoid it. I much prefer satin even without the "sticky" factor. Too bad, because I think GOT looks awesome, and a local shop offered me an amazing deal on a cobalt blue L-1500 with GOT neck and fretboard. I just couldn't do it. (But I did order an L-1500 a couple of weeks later. :D )

I'm a Maple man, myself.