Euclides
09-15-2000, 07:27 PM
Or is it not necessary?
Used to know that.
Thanks.
Used to know that.
Thanks.
|
This is a search-engine-friendly text mirror of the TalkBass Forums Euclides 09-15-2000, 07:27 PM Or is it not necessary? Used to know that. Thanks. JMX 09-15-2000, 07:32 PM I'd advise you to do that, especially if you want to straighten the neck. On most basses you have to loosen or remove the strings to access the truss-rod cavity, anyway. Hambone 09-16-2000, 08:32 AM Since breaking the truss-rod is always in the back of your mind (or should be) I concur with JMX about loosening the strings. Why make the rod work that much harder pulling against the string tension? pkr2 09-16-2000, 04:50 PM Originally posted by Hambone Since breaking the truss-rod is always in the back of your mind (or should be) I concur with JMX about loosening the strings. Why make the rod work that much harder pulling against the string tension? Thank you Hambone. When I suggested the same thing, I had several responses that pointed out several reasons why I was wrong to suggest that sometimes it's better safe than very, very sorry. (several posts ago) A truss rod breaking, or the truss rod nut stripping the threads doesn't do a lot to make your day. By the way, Hambone, How about an update on the computer controlled bass project? Don't leave us hanging. Hambone 09-16-2000, 08:20 PM Ah, don't listen to those guys. They are the ones that'll be on here looking for a source for a new neck or wonderin' how come their truss-rod is so loose. Sure it'll take a bit longer but the results will be the same and since the rod is hidden you can't really tell how much adjustment is left in it. Like you said - Better safe than sorry" |