Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Basses [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Basses [DB] Discussion on the instrument: double bass, string bass, contrabass, bass viol, acoustic bass, upright bass, standup bass, bass fiddle, bass violin, doghouse bass, bull fiddle... :)


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-07-2008, 01:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Lemur Jupiter Upright Bass vs. Cleveland New Standard

i just got an email from lemur about a new bass they are selling.

http://shop5.mailordercentral.com/le...uctinfo/BA152/

looks like it might be a smaller american standard copy like the cleveland new standard. anyone have any more info on this? particularly in regards to how it compares to the cleveland?
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
I got the same e-mail and thought "Hey, that looks like my Cleveland!"
  #3  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Send a message via AIM to JayR
Whatever it is, it sure is purdy for being 2k.
__________________
"I know, sir, that I have played out of tune, but once I learn where to place my fingers, this will no longer happen." - Giovanni Bottesini, on botching his conservatory audition.
  #4  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:16 AM
hdiddy's Avatar
Official Forum Flunkee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Supporting Member
Lam only. I guess they're not going to compete in the hybrid market. One thing they do have going for themselves is that they're based on the west coast.
  #5  
Old 10-13-2008, 12:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stonington, CT
Send a message via AIM to conte2music
Any of you West Coast guys get to Lemur and check one out?
  #6  
Old 10-13-2008, 12:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
I'm amazed that anyone would want to knock off the Cleveland bass. Like any double bass sells well enough to warrant that kind of copycat behavior.

I suppose copies have been around forever, it's just funny to me they are copying a plywood copy of a plywood copy of an Italian Bass.
  #7  
Old 10-13-2008, 12:59 PM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncletoad View Post
I'm amazed that anyone would want to knock off the Cleveland bass. Like any double bass sells well enough to warrant that kind of copycat behavior.

I suppose copies have been around forever, it's just funny to me they are copying a plywood copy of a plywood copy of an Italian Bass.
Are they copying the copy of the copy or are they copying the copy? (Try saying that ten times aloud and fast).

They seem to be copying the same classic American ply of which the Cleveland is also a copy.
  #8  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:08 PM
AES Fine Instruments
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brewster, NY, USA
Just to clarify, the Cleveland is not a copy of the American Standard. It is "in the style of". There are modifications to the shoulders, neck joint, neck, string length, scroll, etc., etc. I have written to Jerry at Lemur expressing my displeasure at his obvious attempt to capitalize on the New Standard's success with a cheap imitation.
  #9  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldschnitzer View Post
Just to clarify, the Cleveland is not a copy of the American Standard. It is "in the style of". There are modifications to the shoulders, neck joint, neck, string length, scroll, etc., etc. I have written to Jerry at Lemur expressing my displeasure at his obvious attempt to capitalize on the New Standard's success with a cheap imitation.
Good, glad to hear it.

Note that in the advertising copy that Lemur says that it is the, "new standard of excellence," etc. Perhaps it is building on the reputation, even the marketing language, of the AES basses.

They don't seem to be the first firm to try to capitalize on the superior value and reputation of the AES instruments with a bit of wordsmithery.

Last edited by Eric Swanson : 10-20-2008 at 11:52 AM.
  #10  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldschnitzer View Post
Just to clarify, the Cleveland is not a copy of the American Standard. It is "in the style of". There are modifications to the shoulders, neck joint, neck, string length, scroll, etc., etc. I have written to Jerry at Lemur expressing my displeasure at his obvious attempt to capitalize on the New Standard's success with a cheap imitation.
It is annoying when a business tries to steal the goodwill from another to make their daily bread rather than creating some of their own.

Happens all the time in all kinds of business.

Maybe they should have bought out the company instead!
  #11  
Old 10-13-2008, 01:59 PM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldschnitzer View Post
Just to clarify, the Cleveland is not a copy of the American Standard. It is "in the style of". There are modifications to the shoulders, neck joint, neck, string length, scroll, etc., etc. I have written to Jerry at Lemur expressing my displeasure at his obvious attempt to capitalize on the New Standard's success with a cheap imitation.

Thanks for the clarification. I was repeating Toad's characterization that they were "copying a plywood copy [Cleveland] of a plywood copy [American Standard] of an Italian Bass."

So do you see Lemur's product as a direct copy of your own or is theirs simply another bass "in the style of" the American Standard? Even if the latter, it would seem that their idea was to profit from your successful approach. What they are doing is pretty obvious. I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say they are trying to "steal good will." Here's a sincere question. At what point does any other company's decision to build a bass of such a style constitute encroachment rather than legitimate competition? One would hope that buyers will recognize quality and value.


Note in edit: Wow! I compared some close-up pics of the Lemur bass and the Cleveland. Geez-- to my eye anyway, the Lemur does, indeed, look like an attempt to copy the Cleveland as closely as possible. Some of the small details are astonishingly close.

Last edited by drurb : 10-13-2008 at 05:49 PM.
  #12  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:01 PM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Swanson View Post
They don't seem to be the first firm to try to capitalize on the superior value and reputation of the AES instruments with a bit of wordsmithery.
There are others?
  #13  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:03 PM
hdiddy's Avatar
Official Forum Flunkee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Supporting Member
DANGER WILL ROBINSON! DANGER!!!
  #14  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdiddy View Post
DANGER WILL ROBINSON! DANGER!!!
  #15  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:19 PM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by drurb View Post
There are others?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdiddy View Post
DANGER WILL ROBINSON! DANGER!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Swanson View Post
Some see conspiracy where there is none.
  #16  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:44 PM
crosswind downwind bass
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tacoma WA
Er, back to the OP. It looks like it has a skinney neck, and says the bridge is high. I am curious where it was made.
__________________
"Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, and more money." Tom T Hall
  #17  
Old 10-13-2008, 02:54 PM
hdiddy's Avatar
Official Forum Flunkee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Supporting Member
Given that they have done business with Sunrise to create the cheaper Bromberg/Wood bass copy, my guess is that it's gonna be chinese.
  #18  
Old 10-13-2008, 04:43 PM
CamMcIntyre's Avatar
No Longer Works a Day Job
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: USA
Send a message via AIM to CamMcIntyre
Supporting Member
I'd go with the Cleveland. It seems like they're doing this to capitalize on the NS success/popularity. The bass will be worth it [NS].

all the best.
__________________
"A lunatic might just be a minority of one."-1984

Sadowsky Club #320
  #19  
Old 10-13-2008, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stonington, CT
Send a message via AIM to conte2music
I'm not in the market...I'm just curious to know if the bass lives up to the claims of volume and punch they made in the ad. I agree with Toad about the use of words that seem to associate it with Arnold's NS. Lemur should consider removing any wording that is misleading or associative with AES's strong products and service.
  #20  
Old 10-13-2008, 06:03 PM
hdiddy's Avatar
Official Forum Flunkee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Supporting Member
Too bad... I'm thinking twice about shopping at Lemur now. Even if I never buy anything from Arnold, why would I want to support that behavior.

And to think I was going to consider going to then to search for an expensive bass.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.