|  | 
12-01-2004, 09:37 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Naushua, New Hampster, U S of | | | Looks gorgeous! I like the ebony cheek plates - the metal ones always put me in mind of the valve gear covers on old steam locomotives, that's why I had them removed on both of my basses - actually they covered some of the carved patterns of my busetto copy (see threads passim). They were far too "mechanical" for my taste, and looked like something from the early industrial revolution! Also we did the G/E swap to help avoid the steep break angle for the E string. So, why did you replace the tuners rather than just refurbish them? The reason I ask is that the new tuners I put on mine look similar to the tuners which were on yours, but without the wooden knobs. I prefer the plain look rather than the patterned type.
Anyway - nice job!
- Wil
__________________
"…………………………"
- Marcel Marceau
| 
12-01-2004, 10:15 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Maui | | | Frickin' yummy. Just.....Frickin' yummy yummy. | 
12-02-2004, 01:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: self banned from talkbass.... | | | Much better, got'a love those ebony plates! | 
12-02-2004, 02:20 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Traverse City, Michigan | | | Looks good!! Quirky but elegant, if that is possible. The black ebony cheeks are a bold statement that seems to match.
You did good Ken!!!
I have always thought that the E tuner should be behind the G. That is how I built the Q bass.
What is your bridge height?
__________________
Ken McKay - Michigan - USA
| 
12-02-2004, 07:18 AM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | Bridge Height The Bridge Height with low action is just a tad over 6" from the center, measuring from the Belly to the top of the Bridge. The Bass has very High Arching so it seems a bit low as compared to 6 1/2-7" Bridge heights but the power is awesome. Most full time Orchestra Players would have the adjusters up a little higher and closer to 6 1/4' on this Bass but the tone and volume of sound is just right.
The Bass had 3 maple shims before overlapping in the middle and the Neck was a bit forward bowed under the shims. I made the Ebony Wedge Shim here in the shop and sent it to Biase to glue under the fingerboard. By the time he got the neck surface straight and flat, the New Shim would put the Bass just about where it was before. The Bridge on the Bass when I got it was made by Violin Maker Andrea Ortona, Venezia (as stamped on the face of the Aubert Bridge)
I was told the the Bass previously had a Lower Bridge in Italy without the Shims and sounded better then with the higher Bridge of it's Post Restoration. I guess with a High Arched Top and Back like this Bass, you dont need a very high Bridge to attain a good Volume or Tone. In fact, I have tried it with raising the Adjusters and the Gain of Volume is minimum but the loss of it's Deep-Sweet Tone diminishes about equally.
I am happy with the sound as it is. The Bass was always a 'Cannon' but the tone was not as Sweet as it is now. It also sounds a little Older or should I say, 'Mellower" than it did when I first strung it up out of the Crate that first day. The Bass did not change much at all tonally untill now.... I guess it was a bit of Luck as well..........
Last edited by KSB - Ken Smith : 12-02-2004 at 10:47 AM.
Reason: typos
| 
12-02-2004, 07:26 AM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | Gears Will, the Wooden type Gears do not tune as fine as these 36:1 ratio Krutz. I think you are referring to the Rubner Brass individual Gears on your Bass. They seem about the same to me as well. I first used these Krutz gears on my 7/8 Shen. Ever since then, I have put them on Every Bass I own when restoring the tuners.
Even The English Shops in discussion about my Gilkes have told me.. "Get some Bakers on that Bass. Those Gears look too Fancy"!
I like them!! So that's all that counts here.......Maybe if these Krutz Gears were available 200 years ago, the King would have had them installed on the Royal Forster Basses....... Or..... Maybe not, but we'll never know.......... | 
12-02-2004, 10:37 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Denver, Co. | | | Fabulous Ken!!
__________________ Oh, no.....have we gone OT yet again? "The opportunity was there...but it never presented itself." Phil Urso, 1980. :atoz: | 
12-03-2004, 05:46 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Richmond, Va | | | Wow Ken,
"A beautiful hand carved Martini Scroll with a 'teardrop' button in the back. This Bass is now set-up with Individual Krutz Gears mounted on Custom carved Ebony Plates in reverse order to relieve tension in the lower register."
I really like the ebony plates. Can you explain the "Reverse order to relieve the tension in the lower register." I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
Thanks | 
12-03-2004, 05:57 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Helsinki, Finland | | | Jay L´attenuator: look where the strings are going in the picture of the pegbox.
R2
__________________
I may suck,
but at least my time´s bad and I have no ideas.
| 
12-03-2004, 07:34 AM
| | | | hmm...gina lolabrigida in the red light zone ? | 
12-03-2004, 07:40 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Denver, Co. | | | I did find something I don't like on the Martini.....My god man, can't we figure out a little neater way to hang your bow quiver on that sucker? That mass of leather thong all scrambled around down by the tail piece is disturbing!
Or do you think i'm just being an obsessive compulsive old fart?
While we're cleaning up here, let's get rid of that sweat rag hanging from your tail piece too?
__________________ Oh, no.....have we gone OT yet again? "The opportunity was there...but it never presented itself." Phil Urso, 1980. :atoz:
Last edited by Paul Warburton : 12-03-2004 at 07:45 AM.
| 
12-03-2004, 07:44 AM
| | | | thong..tail...what's on your mind Pauly ? | 
12-03-2004, 07:47 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Denver, Co. | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DZ thong..tail...what's on your mind Pauly ? | Maybe there is a use for that rag........... 
__________________ Oh, no.....have we gone OT yet again? "The opportunity was there...but it never presented itself." Phil Urso, 1980. :atoz: | 
12-03-2004, 08:00 AM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | Gear Order Good morning all.. Hope everybody slept well last night...
Ok J', The 'E' and 'A' are higher than the 'G' and 'D' which the opposite is the normal way except for some 19th century French Basses. My Bernadel (the real deal, Gustave c.1859) was like that and had less tension than others Basses. The 'E sounded fuller and the 'G' was less tight as well.
By lenghtening the 'E' up at the Scroll, you change the angle break and the String is under less stress. By shortening the 'G' you add a little tension at the angle break and the String floats easier over the Fingerboard. The 'E' and 'G' are very different in size and this seems to change the feel under MY fingers at least.. The Tailpiece brought up about 1 1/2" towards the Bridge also loosened the tension as well. I can feel and hear the difference. The Peg Box being re-inforced with Hard Maple Plugs and Ebony Cheeks seems to have more of a solid feel as well. I guess it's a combination of all 3 mods combined.
DZ/Gina.. Aren't you 'Cute' this time of the morning.. Still in your 'teddy'?
Paul, Don't you like my Leather 'BowTie' knot? I guess at your age, leather isn't your thing..... Maybe Gina/DZ likes my leather..I'll ask..lol | 
12-03-2004, 08:06 AM
| | | | still in my teddy ???? Good Grief that conjured up an image that i'd rather not deal with this early in the morning. at least we know what your thinking this morning you D.O.M !!! haha | 
12-03-2004, 08:13 AM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | Thoughts? Yo.. you guys come up with this stuff.. I'm just responding here like an innocent spectator.... Well........ maybe not so innocent.. But I was provoked !! | 
12-03-2004, 12:40 PM
| | AES Fine Instruments | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Brewster, NY, USA | | | Call me a killjoy, but I don't dig the ebony plates. | 
12-03-2004, 01:59 PM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | Choices If all of you had seen what I had in my hands b4 I started the project, opinions might be different. The Previous Gears b4 the Hatpeg Rubners had been plugged with Pine Dowel, 1 1/8" inch (9/8") diameter thru both sides of the Pegbox. It looked like Swiss Cheese when I got all the Plugs out and ready for re-plugging. Actually, it looked worse.....My work was fine but one big 'sneeze' and I was afraid the Pegbox would split.
My four choices were;
1) No plates at all and Varnish over the Plugs after fitting them and match to rest of the Scroll The re-drill and install the Gears.
2) Make a custom Brass Plate and Install the Gears on top as I did with the Gilkes.
3) Make a Maple Plate similar to the wood of the Scroll leaving it thin like the Ebony Plate (or raised and carved like the Mystery Bass I did) and Match the Varnish to the Scroll and fit the Gears.
or.. 4) Make the Ebony Plates matching the Fingerboard color and Mount the Gears on the Ebony.
I choose #4 as I thought it would look the best and be the strongest fix for this Modern Italian Bass with Modern Gears in Modern times. We shouldn't be so shortsighted and make everything to Tradition. If this Had been an older Bass like a Testori or the like, Option #4 would not be a choice at all.... | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |