Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Basses [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Basses [DB] Discussion on the instrument: double bass, string bass, contrabass, bass viol, acoustic bass, upright bass, standup bass, bass fiddle, bass violin, doghouse bass, bull fiddle... :)


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:04 PM
funkythumb's Avatar
Registered User

Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Supporting Member
Upton vs. New Standard

Hey all,
So I'm mostly an electric guy who's been doubling for years. I have an ok Wilfer and am researching to find a good sounding yet inexpensive DB for the road.
Upton basses seems to make a really nice laminate $1,800. I was curious as to how it sounds in comparison to the Cleveland, New Standard bass. The Upton is more in my price range but I was interested to get opinions on tone.
I'm going to try some local stuff around $1,500 and depending on sound might get an Upton.
Any input?
thanks
Sign in to disble this ad
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
  #2  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:50 PM
MollyKay's Avatar
Registered User

Bass Hobby'ist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern PA
GOLD Supporting Member
Oh…you innocent unknowing person…be prepared for a fire storm.

Check out these links…use the search tools…and then run for cover!

http://www.talkbass.com/reviews/show...p/product/1185

Lemur Jupiter Upright Bass vs. Cleveland New Standard
  #3  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:25 PM
funkythumb's Avatar
Registered User

Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Supporting Member
Gird my loins!!! That's why I'm here asking.
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
  #4  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:45 PM
funkythumb's Avatar
Registered User

Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Supporting Member
Well, some of you have been kind enough to write privately to me professing your strong opinions on both brands and saying that you'd be afraid to post your opinions publicly. I, of course, respect your decision and ask you to continue to write.
The opinions have been interesting and not what I expected.
thanks all
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
  #5  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
Cleveland is my backup bass. It's the one I go to when standing the line of fire. It will take a bullet, my 150 year old Alsatian Queen will not.

I've played a bunch of basses, ply, solid, hybrid etc. Bang for the buck I couldn't be happier.

Never played an Upton so I can't compare.

Fwiw, I never seen any complaints about the Cleveland beyond "it's a plywood."

If you can afford and use a carved bass I'd do it but if you need something that works, sounds great and is durable...Cleveland.
  #6  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:58 PM
funkythumb's Avatar
Registered User

Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Supporting Member
Thanks Phil, always appreciate your opinion.
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
  #7  
Old 04-08-2009, 10:30 PM
JeffKissell's Avatar
JeffKissell
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soquel, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncletoad View Post
Cleveland is my backup bass. It's the one I go to when standing the line of fire. It will take a bullet, my 150 year old Alsatian Queen will not.

I've played a bunch of basses, ply, solid, hybrid etc. Bang for the buck I couldn't be happier.

Never played an Upton so I can't compare.

Fwiw, I never seen any complaints about the Cleveland beyond "it's a plywood."

If you can afford and use a carved bass I'd do it but if you need something that works, sounds great and is durable...Cleveland.
+1

...except for the 150 year old fine European bass part!

-J
__________________
"...sounds like a goddamn train wreck!"
  #8  
Old 04-09-2009, 12:58 AM
Chris Fitzgerald's Avatar
Student of Life
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
The New Standard laminates I've played (I own a LaScala laminate and have played several Clevelands) are the best ply basses I've ever seen, and definitely the loudest. John Goldsby recorded the "Live at the Nachbar" CD (soundclips at the link) on my LaScala, and sounded great. I've got another recording or two of that bass in a longer setting up here somewhere as well.

I've not spent any real quality time with an Upton, so I can't comment there. If anybody has any Upton soundclips, please feel free to post them here by way of comparison.

This issue has tended to be somewhat polarizing, but it needn't be. The best advice possible is to try to get your hands on one or more of each and let your hands and ears decide.
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are.
chrisfitzgeraldmusic.com
  #9  
Old 04-09-2009, 01:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NorCal
Just keep in mind that you could buy two Upton Standards, for less than the price of one New Standard Cleveland.

I'm sure they are both great basses.
  #10  
Old 04-09-2009, 06:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearhead43 View Post
Just keep in mind that you could buy two Upton Standards, for less than the price of one New Standard Cleveland.

I'm sure they are both great basses.
Yeah, but you just have the Upton Standard (or 2 of them) and not the New Standard. I don't own either, but I have played and been impressed by the New Standard Cleveland. Two times.

Again I don't own either. I own 2 American Standards. The standard of Standards, if you will.

Sorry, I couldn't resist. <---Errrrrbody see dis?
__________________
Mike Ramsey
http://www.BigMikeRamsey.com
  #11  
Old 04-09-2009, 07:52 AM
funkythumb's Avatar
Registered User

Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta
Supporting Member
I've heard some sound clips of the New Standards and am amazed at their sound. I have no doubt whatsoever about their quality and tone. I am, however, less familiar with the Upton, having only heard a few sound clips. I've found someone in my city who owns a Cleveland and plan on going for a visit. Any Upton laminate owners in Atlanta?
If I were to rephrase my question, I'd have to ask "is paying twice the money worth it when comparing the tone of each instrument?"
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
  #12  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City area
Twice the price? My current bass cost me three times what the Upton cost. How can I measure value?
1) Sound volume? Big winner. Cannon.
2) Ease of play? 43" 7/8ths vs 41.5 ?? Loss.
3) Weight or portability? The new one is bigger and heavier, so that's a loss.
4) Complexity of tone? Big winner there.
5) Enjoyment in the experience of playing. Big winner.

Although my CPA might argue my sense of value, the additional expense is more than worth it to me.

Sure I could have just bought two more Uptons. What's the point in having three basses I wouldn't enjoy playing? < See that? Chill.


Toad's new Queen was what, 4X the price of the Cleveland? When you really love something it doesn't really matter much what it costs, does it?
__________________
You forget sometimes that you are playing music, not just playing jazz. ....Charlie Haden

Last edited by clink : 04-09-2009 at 08:19 AM.
  #13  
Old 04-09-2009, 09:00 AM
Humberto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pleasantville, New York
GOLD Supporting Member
Upton vs. Cleveland

I don't have experience with the Upton... I can only say that the Cleveland hybrid I've owned for 3 years gets better and better.

Best bass I've owned for the $$.... not to mention Arnold's such a nice luthier... he has a way of getting the most of the woods he crafts and he listens to what you want from your bass, string combinations, etc...

Try it - you won't go back...
  #14  
Old 04-09-2009, 09:11 AM
drurb's Avatar
Oracle, Ancient Order of Rass Hattur
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by clink View Post
Twice the price? My current bass cost me three times what the Upton cost. How can I measure value?
1) Sound volume? Big winner. Cannon.
2) Ease of play? 43" 7/8ths vs 41.5 ?? Loss.
3) Weight or portability? The new one is bigger and heavier, so that's a loss.
4) Complexity of tone? Big winner there.
5) Enjoyment in the experience of playing. Big winner.

Although my CPA might argue my sense of value, the additional expense is more than worth it to me.

Sure I could have just bought two more Uptons. What's the point in having three basses I wouldn't enjoy playing? < See that? Chill.


Toad's new Queen was what, 4X the price of the Cleveland? When you really love something it doesn't really matter much what it costs, does it?
You're absolutely right. Each person must decide for him/herself what is the value of the enjoyment received. It's very personal. The question being asked here seems to be whether the New Standard offers enough perceived advantage to justify the substantially greater price. Of course, one would probably not buy two Uptons instead of one Cleveland. The question really is whether anything at all is missed by buying one Upton vs. one New Standard. I have not played a New Standard next to a current USA-made Upton lami. What we have here is folks who have experience with the New Standards and little or none with the Upton lami. It's clear that New Standard owners love their basses-- and they should! None, so far, has been able to offer a straightforward comparison. I cannot either because I have spent a fair amount of time with the new Upton lami but not the New Standard. Several weeks ago, I played and heard three Upton lamis, one strung with Spiros, one with Helicores, and one with Evahs. My impression was that they sounded and played better than a lami has a right to. The finish work was beautiful too. What would really be nice is if someone could compare these basses side-by-side. I can't and, so far, neither can anyone else who has offered their insight. There is a link to a sound/video clip of the Upton lami on their site.
__________________
Famous last words: And with that- Im gone. You will probably read in the paper soon about a deranged kid who burns his bass in front of a luthier.

Last edited by drurb : 04-09-2009 at 09:13 AM.
  #15  
Old 04-09-2009, 09:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dc
ive played both and based on your situation I'd get the upton.
  #16  
Old 04-09-2009, 09:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Aresnio,

I'd love to hear more, since you've played 'em both. Thanks.
  #17  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:22 AM
Chris Fitzgerald's Avatar
Student of Life
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Quote:
Originally Posted by drurb View Post
What would really be nice is if someone could compare these basses side-by-side.
I hope to be able to do this in the not-too distant future, with sound clips if possible. In the meantime, if anybody with an Upton of any kind happens to attend the Aebersold camps, please look me up and let's do a hang!

Quote:
There is a link to a sound/video clip of the Upton lami on their site.
I'm probably a dummy, but can you send me link? I couldn't find it.
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are.
chrisfitzgeraldmusic.com
  #18  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:28 AM
Bass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by funkythumb View Post
Well, some of you have been...saying that you'd be afraid to post your opinions publicly.
What a shame!

I own a 2006 Upton Laminate (not one of the new USA Uptons) and couldn't be happier.

"Good sounding yet inexpensive" - that sounds like Upton to me.
__________________
"That is a copyrighted photo of me you stole from my website. The joke is over funny man. Change it now before I threaten legal action to Paul at TB and yourself... the Dogs are off the leash."
  #19  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston
Send a message via AIM to Andrew Grandahl
I had a rehearsal last night for a cello concerto in which I was the only bassist. I wanted to use my friend's Cleveland because she has an extension. Hers is a few years old, strung with Helicores. I played through the piece with my bow, then took the music to my practice room and tried it with my 2006 Upton hybrid, strung with Evahs and with hundreds and hundreds of hours of playing time put into it. It cost me $2600. It's sound was deeper and even louder. I took the Upton to the rehearsal. I've played the revised, American made Uptons and they're even more impressive. I can't say enough for the kind of bang for your buck you get from them. That said, the Cleveland is definitely easier to play, and I've never heard it with Evahs, superior strings to Helicores in my opinion.

This is your first double bass, and you want something for the road... get the Upton.
  #20  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Grandahl View Post
I had a rehearsal last night for a cello concerto in which I was the only bassist. I wanted to use my friend's Cleveland because she has an extension. Hers is a few years old, strung with Helicores. I played through the piece with my bow, then took the music to my practice room and tried it with my 2006 Upton hybrid, strung with Evahs and with hundreds and hundreds of hours of playing time put into it. It cost me $2600. It's sound was deeper and even louder. I took the Upton to the rehearsal. I've played the revised, American made Uptons and they're even more impressive. I can't say enough for the kind of bang for your buck you get from them. That said, the Cleveland is definitely easier to play, and I've never heard it with Evahs, superior strings to Helicores in my opinion.

This is your first double bass, and you want something for the road... get the Upton.
Finally an objective comparison.

Thanks for posting that.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.