Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Basses [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Basses [DB] Discussion on the instrument: double bass, string bass, contrabass, bass viol, acoustic bass, upright bass, standup bass, bass fiddle, bass violin, doghouse bass, bull fiddle... :)


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-25-2003, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: My happy place
Send a message via AIM to Groovski
What makes a playable bass to you?

?
Sign in to disble this ad
__________________
Just being still and knowing
Macon D'Groovalishous
ww.mustangmesa.com
  #2  
Old 11-26-2003, 05:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the end of the section
Send a message via ICQ to toman Send a message via AIM to toman
I think most players will agree that the most important things are going to be the fingerboard, bridge, nut, strings and soundpost setting. Those are the things that will make a bad bass playable, and if screwed up will make an excellent bass unplayable. Everything else is going to just be details that will make the bass sound or feel slightly better or different.

(note: this is all assuming the bass itself is in functioning order; i.e. the neck isn't coming off and the top is glued on more than 3/4 of the way around...)
  #3  
Old 11-26-2003, 07:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: My happy place
Send a message via AIM to Groovski
$600 vs. $2K

I have been playing upright for about a year now. I have a (Palatino) cheap bass, my first, thats really hard to play. It feels real stiff and has a boomy sound. My other (Strunel) bass has a much better feel. It plays itself and has great tone. What is the difference? Is it only because one is cheap and the other isn't? All help is appreceated
__________________
Just being still and knowing
Macon D'Groovalishous
ww.mustangmesa.com
  #4  
Old 11-26-2003, 08:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Chicken or Egg

Quote:
Is it only because one is cheap and the other isn't?
I think it's safe to assume that the strunal isn't better because it's more expensive, but it's more expensive because it's better.

Why is it better. Well, better construction and materials would be the easy answer. But with DBs the setup is extremely important. Also, instruments are a very subjective thing. Although the chinese BSO (bass shaped object) doesn't have many fans in these parts.
  #5  
Old 11-26-2003, 08:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Re: $600 vs. $2K

Quote:
Originally posted by Groovski
I have been playing upright for about a year now. I have a (Palatino) cheap bass, my first, thats really hard to play. It feels real stiff and has a boomy sound. My other (Strunel) bass has a much better feel. It plays itself and has great tone. What is the difference? Is it only because one is cheap and the other isn't? All help is appreceated
Well, not always. Setup is very much the key to a playable bass, BUT....in your case it also has to do with the undisputed fact that the crapatino is not a bass, but in fact a bass-shaped wooden object. Look, my Christopher Hybrid (IMO) sounds better than my teacher's old tarantino flatback. And his is a much more expensive instrument.

It is a combination of quality of bass, setup, and.....how you play it. Remember - Michael Moore uses a $15 bow that's been broken several times.

Sell the crapatino and fix up that Strunal - they can be quite nice basses when setup correctly.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Warburton
Take me to the bathroom now Jesus!!!!!
http://alexidavid.com
  #6  
Old 11-26-2003, 09:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
I had a Carlo Robelli (a Sam Ash brand) plywood that I got for $700.00. I never had it worked on, it was tough to play, sounded OK and held together. 6 months after that I sold it and got a Strunal, with no set up work done and the same strings that were on the plywood the bass sounded and felt a whole lot better. It inspired me to get it set up at David Gage and 4 years later I still have it, who knows about the BSO.
IMHO, the BSO is not an instrument to spend money on, if you spend $400.00 dollars on a set up then you've got a $1100.00 bass that still is a disapointment, plus try to sell that bass for that kind of money. I agree with Mingus Fingers, sell the BSO, invest the proceeds from that sale in the Strunal, you wont be sorry.
__________________
Pedulla Club #3, Ibanez club #323
http://www.myspace.com/michaelcasebass
  #7  
Old 11-28-2003, 12:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: My happy place
Send a message via AIM to Groovski
Well I take the Palatino to outdoor gigs, festivals and such. It projects really well but as it was said earlier, Its really hard to play. It does help to strengthen my hands. I just love the Strunal though. Great tones, great playablitiy straight out of Sam Ash in Nashville, which leads me back to the question. What makes this one more playable? What do you change in the setup to make the crappy one more playable or if I was going to have one kinda put together for me, what do you ask for? Thanks for all of the replys guys.
__________________
Just being still and knowing
Macon D'Groovalishous
ww.mustangmesa.com
  #8  
Old 11-28-2003, 01:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
One thing you could do is have your bridge cut for lower action. You may have to have your fingerboard plained to allow lower action. Depending on where you live this may be more money than you want to spend on a BSO. You could also look into strings, maybe Obligatos, they are rather comfortable. I can't explain the reason why the Strunal is more playable out of the box than the Palantino though.
__________________
Pedulla Club #3, Ibanez club #323
http://www.myspace.com/michaelcasebass
  #9  
Old 11-28-2003, 01:19 PM
davegr8house's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Supporting Member
Re: Re: $600 vs. $2K

Quote:
Originally posted by MingusFingus
Remember - Michael Moore uses a $15 bow that's been broken several times.
uhhh...you sure about that? Michael Moore?
__________________
...just about anything can be funkified, if your funk be bona fide...
  #10  
Old 11-28-2003, 05:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ridgewood, NJ
Re: Re: $600 vs. $2K

Quote:
Originally posted by MingusFingus
Remember - Michael Moore uses a $15 bow that's been broken several times. .
No he doesn't.
__________________
Certified to teach the Alexander Technique. see donaldhigdon.com
  #11  
Old 11-29-2003, 01:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: eugene, oregon
CHUNKY FUNGUS - i think you're thinking of edgar meyer. his bow has been broken and repaired a couple of times.

sean p
  #12  
Old 11-30-2003, 07:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brooklyn
oops. Yeah, that's right, I think it was Edgar. need less coffee.

And I ain't chunky. And be nice to Mr. Mingus.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Warburton
Take me to the bathroom now Jesus!!!!!
http://alexidavid.com
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.