My observations are completely un-scientific...
however, pretty much any amp sounds different when bridged usually because of a slight increase in harmonic distortion. I'm not sure if that's what I heard or not. The WW stereo bridged amp growls slightly and has a little bit of ?texture? in the low end that I find very pleasing and 'organic' for lack of a better term. Very slight difference here. You'd have to be listening for it I think.
Again, I LOVE my WW ultra and it works for me every day without fail, but if I could trade it for one of these stereo versions I'd do it in a heartbeat.
200 watts or 20% more watts in the Ultra is almost insignificant to our ears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBassed  Not to derail, but how different does the bridged stereo version sound versus the mono Ultra (besides being 200W less)? Can you describe the difference?
I like these stereo versions and think the pan controls that Walter incorporated in them are really cool (they add a lot of flexibility). I hadn't heard that they sounded different than the mono versions though when bridged... |
