Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Sponsored Forums > G&L Bass Forum
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

G&L Bass Forum Addicts of Leo Fender's latest basses welcome here, as well as those interested in what drives the addiction to the basses from Fender Avenue.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-29-2007, 08:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Singapore
G&L l-2000 vs G&L SB-2

Sign in to disble this ad
as said above, which one would you guys get? And which one is more versatile? cuz the pickups are diff too
  #2  
Old 01-29-2007, 09:20 AM
craigb's Avatar
needs to spend more time on music and less on gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Spring, TX (Houston metro)
Supporting Member
I'd get an SB-2, heck I've got 3 of 'em (US, Tribute, fretless). But would/should you?

SB-2 - MFD P-J pickups, 2 volumes, skinny neck standard

L2K - MFD humbuckers, vol/treble cut/bass cut knobs, pickup selector (neck/both/bridge)/series-parallel/passive-active-active+boost switches, wider neck standard

Sonically the L2K is highly versatile. With the 2 pickups, 3 knobs and 3 switches you can get a lot of different tones out of it. The SB-2 has a single basic sound with variations in texture offered by the bridge pickup (the P pickup overwhelms the J pickup).

Both have a vintage-ey, growl-ey character to them. The SB-2 can be a touch clearer (and also harsher and clankier). The L2K is a bit less clear but has more bottom and more growl (in addition to the greater range of tones available).

For me I prefer the clarity and simplicity (passive, less controls) of the SB-2. I like using plucking position and playing technique to extract different sounds from it. I plug-and-play with it and don't usually mess with the controls once I've started playing. I have modified my controls so they are master volume/bridge pickup volume (stacked) and tone.

I'm also a skinny-neck weenie but you can get a skinny neck on an L2K also (I've had those), albeit only on US G&Ls.

Which is best for you depends on which one gets the sound(s) you want and whether the variety of sounds is important to you.
__________________
wanting off the GAS carousel but enjoying the ride too much
  #3  
Old 01-29-2007, 03:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
I love them both. Both basses are quite versatile, but require tweaking to find the sounds you may want.

The SB-2 is a great, simple, honest bass. You can't go wrong.

The L2K/ASAT (ASAT has a skinnier neck standard) has a punch & growl that nearly makes me weep. You won't find a more versatile bass either.
__________________
4 strings + 27 tubes = bliss
  #4  
Old 01-30-2007, 04:01 AM
sunbeast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Send a message via AIM to sunbeast
Supporting Member
I say- get both! You can't get the SB-2 sounds from an L2000 or vise-versa. If I was going to choose only one, it would be the L2000- because I like a bass with lots of bottom end, and especially low mids. The SB-2 has alot more high mids, and might work better for alot of music- just not what I do. Plus, you can always cut bass on the L2000 to make it sound more like what the SB-2 does- it just won't sound quite the same. If I was ever in a position where I'd be playing lots of bass solos then the SB-2 would be my go-to bass over any other bass I've ever played (but I rarely play solos!)- it is a very fast-playing bass and cuts similar to a Rickenbacker.

Karl
__________________
G&L Club Member #10
  #5  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Belgium
This makes me want an SB-2 even more!
That black tribby...

EDIT: Sunbeast, would you say the SB-2 lacks bottom end and low mids? Or is it just that the L2K has so much of them?

Craigb: do you use your tone control a lot? And did you lose some tones with the master volume instead of P volum? Or is it (almost) exactly the same?

Last edited by Willem : 01-30-2007 at 07:54 AM. Reason: Adding question
  #6  
Old 01-30-2007, 08:18 AM
craigb's Avatar
needs to spend more time on music and less on gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Spring, TX (Houston metro)
Supporting Member
For me, I didn't lose a thing with the master volume over separate volumes. The reason is that I never try to adjust the J pickup volume greater than the P pickup volume (I could live without the J pickup but you don't usually find SB-1s with skinny necks). So going with my setup I can adjust the J pickup relative to the P and then adjust the overall volume with the master without changing the relative pickup levels.

I find myself using the tone to tame newer strings - they can be clangy/zingy and I can tone that down. It's not that I tweak it while playing, just that I set it to a level that pleases me at the start of a playing session and then leave it be and vary tone using plucking position/technique from then on.
__________________
wanting off the GAS carousel but enjoying the ride too much
  #7  
Old 01-30-2007, 10:40 PM
sunbeast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Send a message via AIM to sunbeast
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willem View Post

EDIT: Sunbeast, would you say the SB-2 lacks bottom end and low mids? Or is it just that the L2K has so much of them?
Its not that it lacks them at all- its low end is very comparable to a Fender P-bass, it just has so much more high end and high mids than the average P-bass that you may find yourself boosting lows to compensate (or cutting the highs/ wishing you had a tone knob- but I personally am fine without one!). Also, the L2000 has more lows than any other bass I've ever played- so there's hardly any comparison (the difference between a split coil pickup like a P and a giant humbucking pickup...).

Karl
__________________
G&L Club Member #10
  #8  
Old 01-31-2007, 06:03 PM
Marley's Ghost's Avatar
Markbass fanboy
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Delawhere
Supporting Member
I had a L2K. I sold it and bought a SB2. I agree with most of what has been said already. For the type of music I play (R&B, Classic Rock, vintage funk) The SB2 w flats nails the tone I am looking for. I only had rounds on the L2k, so I cant do a direct comparison there I found the L2K was very hot and needed a lot of tweaking in active, and sounded kinda thin passive. If you slap or are looking for more growl, the L2K is probably a better choice. The SB2 with flats is a thump beast!
__________________
Current Markbass Club President

10 year member at Talkbass
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.