G&L SB-2 vs. Warwick Thumb

idoru · #1 06-08-2008, 03:04 AM

g'day all,

has anybody done a direct comparison between these two basses? Both are known for their ability to cut in the mix, but the SB-2 has that vintage vibe I dig. The Thumb is a little less appealing visually, and very strange ergonomically. It's perfect for my heavy band though, nothing else has the same presence.

I bring this up now because I've spent a _lot_ of time with my L2K in my covers band, and really dig it's style & playability. It just doesn't fit quite so well into my other band - I need to turn up a lot louder to be heard. Or get an eq unit for my rack, but that's less fun. I like to get the bulk of my sound from the bass, and really I'm looking for an excuse to get another G&L!

c-

frankenchrist · #2 06-09-2008, 04:15 AM

thumb

birminghambass · #3 06-09-2008, 08:36 AM

I've had 2 SB2s, IMO a L2000 can cut through the mix better. However, the L1500 cuts through better than any other G&L I've owned or played.

Joebone · #4 06-09-2008, 01:05 PM

Tried a Thumb NT - neat sound, superb look and workmanship, loved those 26 frets, but totally non-happening ergonomics with the neck dive. Took a few lessons with a great teacher who quickly convinced me I was nuts to settle for ergonomic hassles when there are so many fish in the ocean. Since then have owned several L2K's, and think I've found one that really works for me. They all present a dramatic range of tonal control, although their natural voice can vary depending on wood, age, etc. It's hard to imagine gigs that one of these couldn't cover...so I'd say go G&L for long term satisfaction in a broad range of situations.

darjama · #5 06-09-2008, 09:18 PM

I had a thumb 5 bolt-on for several years. They're really good basses, but don't fit what I do as well as my l2000e. I found them much less versatile. For what it's worth, I didn't have a neck dive problem, but I use a pretty meaty strap, which helps I think.

There's a lot of versatility to the L2K, I'm sure if you mess with the internal controls you'll find something that works for band #2.

quickervicar · #6 06-10-2008, 08:30 AM

I tried out a Thumb NT when my main bass was my beloved SB-2. I had no neck-dive issues, but then again I don't have them with my ASAT either. I could pull off tones and runs that simply were not possible with my SB-2. I was in love & I've been wanting one ever since. The Warwick will not have the old-school vibe but it does the modern sound incredibly well.

My vote is Thumb.

whoneedstherapy · #7 06-10-2008, 09:44 PM

I think they are 2 different fish altogether. Yes they both cut through the mix however any sound man worth his salt should be able to have a p/j/pj cut through.

The double Buck would be a better comparison as can be similar sounding to the SB-2 due to the body wood & pickup options.

I like my SB-2 and would pick it over a new Thumb however if i could find an older style one (pre 97 i think?) with the thinner neck i'd jump on it in a second. It would've quite have the big bottom end like the SB-2 though.

Krinkle5 · #8 06-10-2008, 11:45 PM

Apple Vs Oranges?

idoru · #9 06-11-2008, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krinkle5

Apple Vs Oranges?

Quote:

Both are known for their ability to cut in the mix

The point is to eat fruit, so the comparison is relevant

Looks like I REALLY should have grabbed that SB-2 when I had the chance

c-

fcappi · #10 06-11-2008, 07:15 AM

Tangerines and Pumpkins.

Seriously The sb2 is more P-Bass on steroids especially with a tone mod.

idoru · #11 06-12-2008, 04:55 AM

Time for an experiment - I'll take my $150 SX Precision with me to practice (in addition to the Warwick). Need to see if that classic low-mid bump will do the trick on my rig. Glassjaw, Deftones & Underoath all use P basses in a heavy setting, so there's a modern precedent. If I'm happy with the sound, then I know the SB-2 will cut it and then some

[EDIT] I'm pleasantly surprised - even a dirt cheap P-bass cuts it in that band.

c-