| 
07-07-2007, 09:08 AM
|  | Registered User Web Wookiee for several folks | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Saint Louis, MO | | | Maple vs. Rosewood
Sign in to disble this ad
Well I made my mind up to get a L-2000 with the Blueburst. Now I'm having fun figuring out with neck wood to order. I like both and didn't really hear a difference when I played both through the same amp.
I know that maple can be brighter which I kind of like with the boomy sound of the Bass.
Other than looks...what do you guys like the best on your G&L?
__________________ P-Bass #00 / Ampeg #191 / Relic #36 / Nash Owner #12 | 
07-07-2007, 11:06 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Allen, TX | | | I'm a maple man!
__________________
G&L Club #76
| 
07-07-2007, 11:43 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Seattle | | | Rosewood. Particularly with G&L. Rosewood tends to take off just a bit of the aggressive edge, which IMO works well for me in my current situations. | 
07-07-2007, 12:31 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: San Diego Ca | | I have Rosewood on my L2K and I still have plenty of brightness: enough to share with someone else. And I can still control the boomyness.
I have ordered an ebony fingerboard on my forthcoming L-2500 as I have used ebony before and liked the sound I got out of my Gibson ripper.
Ebony is supposed to have sound quality somewhere between Rosewood and maple. A real discerning ear might be able to tell the difference.
Enjoy your new bass. Getting it put together, is a good percentage of the fun.
Larry Quote:
Originally Posted by redstrand Well I made my mind up to get a L-2000 with the Blueburst. Now I'm having fun figuring out with neck wood to order. I like both and didn't really hear a difference when I played both through the same amp.
I know that maple can be brighter which I kind of like with the boomy sound of the Bass.
Other than looks...what do you guys like the best on your G&L? |
__________________
God never promised us second best.
| 
07-07-2007, 01:01 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ChicagoLand | | | Rosewood for me on my L2K.
Not really a fan of Maple fretboards, but have not used them too much to strongly back that up.
What I like about rosewood is that it is an open grain, takes on boiled linseed oil nicely which should be done at least once a year to keep it from drying out, and can be cleaned/polished with a fine steel wool.
Plus it is dark ..... I like that. | 
07-07-2007, 02:43 PM
|  | rythum rancher | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: gone fishin' | | | I've become a fan of GOT recently. Like the way it feels, and the great looks are a nice bonus.
A maple board with GOT really gets my attention, and I'd pay the extra to have it.
$.02 | 
07-07-2007, 03:00 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: San Diego | | | If you can't hear any difference get maple. It doesn't need as much maintenance as rosewood and feels better under the fingers.
For sweetest feel under the fingers, I love ebony.
Jim | 
07-07-2007, 05:40 PM
|  | Registered User Web Wookiee for several folks | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Saint Louis, MO | | | I saw the GOT too...I agree it feels and looks great.
__________________ P-Bass #00 / Ampeg #191 / Relic #36 / Nash Owner #12 | 
07-08-2007, 09:28 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: CO | | | My favorite G&L sounds have been done with rosewood.
Dave | 
07-08-2007, 08:31 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Wynne, Arkansas | | I like the maple simply because INMO it looks better and the main reason is that I can see it better on a dark stage. 
__________________
Well, I gotta tell ya. "I was just beside myself, and ya know what? I looked pretty good".
| 
07-09-2007, 01:52 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Austria | | | If YOU can not hear a difference between maple and rosewood, take the board which you like better for optical reasons. I have a blueburst L-2500 tribute with maple board that looks amazing. If I could buy an US G&L I would get a blueburst with binding and Rosewood board. Without binding I like the maple board better. | 
07-09-2007, 09:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Raleigh, NC | | | I've never been able to tell much difference in the sound from listening to other players.
I wonder if they weigh about the same? (if that's a concern)...
Last edited by earlgray : 07-09-2007 at 09:52 AM.
| 
07-09-2007, 09:51 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Raleigh, NC | | | FWIW, I've got 6 G&Ls, with a 7th on order.
Five are maple, and 2 are (will be) ebony.
Not sure about G&L, but a lot of guitar makers have been using Pao Ferro, sometimes called "Brazilian Rosewood." Its almost as hard as ebony, but more plentiful and much cheaper than the traditional RW.
I have a couple Fenders with Pao Ferro necks and they're pretty nice... | 
07-09-2007, 12:15 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: League City, Tx | |
nuff said
__________________
Lefty Union Member #26 G&L Club Member #2, Rickenbacker Club #4 Acoustic Club #2 Jag Club Member #2 T-40 club #15 Medium Bass Club #58 Korg Pandora club #2
| 
07-10-2007, 09:59 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Lancaster, PA | | | 3 G & Ls. 1 Rosewood. 2 Maple. I prefer the maple. Never tried an ebony on a G & L, but I think I'd really like it.
__________________ 4 strings + 27 tubes = bliss | 
07-10-2007, 10:53 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Torrance, CA | | | I usually prefer rosewood of the two. To me it's largely on what I think looks good with the body color and has little to do with sound. Ebony is my favorite though. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |