Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
A $160 full-range 1x12 cab

I posted the details at-

http://jerry.cork.googlepages.com/coffeehousecab



Summary:

It's designed to be cheap and easy to build. There are plenty of technical flaws I ignored in the interest of being cheap and easy to build.

It is NOT designed for practice with a rock band; it just won't get that loud.
  #2  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:14 AM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Gravity Picks
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio/West Virginia
Send a message via AIM to J. Crawford Send a message via Skype™ to J. Crawford
So this is a cheap cab made for practice?

I dont see this being ethical. Why not buy a cheap practice amp for that price, seeing this cab wont work without some kind of head or power supply.

I guess Im more comfused than anything.
__________________
Fender - Gallien Krueger - Avatar - Gravity

Facebook
Twitter
  #3  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario
I think you might be better off with a BFM Omni 10 or soemthing
  #4  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordasch View Post
So this is a cheap cab made for practice?
For practice (which is often lower in volume than performance). It makes plenty of volume for some types of music, but I doubt it would do for R&R with a big drumset. Most of the rock bands I have been involved with liked to practice LOUD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordasch View Post
I dont see this being ethical.
ethical

1. of or based on a system of moral beliefs about right and wrong
2. in accordance with principles of professional conduct

Now I am confused.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordasch View Post
I dont see this being ethical.

Why not buy a cheap practice amp for that price, seeing this cab wont work without some kind of head or power supply.
I have a head already, that I move from home to practice. I just don't want to move a speaker cabinet; it's a lot more trouble. It's one load for a head and a gig bag.

I haven't heard that many practice amps under $200 that had a tone and volume I liked. Although the speaker I used is pretty low-end for Eminence, I think it's probably much better than what is common in small practice amps.
  #5  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:28 AM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Gravity Picks
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio/West Virginia
Send a message via AIM to J. Crawford Send a message via Skype™ to J. Crawford
Replace ethical with functional, my bad.

I was just stating my opinion, something these threads call for. It looks like a solid cab for practice, but I just dont see its benefits over a movable practice combo.

IMO!
__________________
Fender - Gallien Krueger - Avatar - Gravity

Facebook
Twitter
  #6  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:32 AM
IvanMike's Avatar
Player Characters fear me...
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Middletown CT, USA
Send a message via AIM to IvanMike
Supporting Member
how does it sound? I'm assuming you're primarily using it for home practice and entertainment. Looks cool, which always helps if it's in the living room.
  #7  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
If you like the tone I think it looks kind of neat, and the only drawback is the power handling. An upgraded speaker and additional bracing for the SPL would increase the price, but probably still keep it affordable and relatively easy to build. Nice work.
__________________
Bass is the root of all Elvis.

Last edited by uaudio : 05-10-2009 at 09:35 AM.
  #8  
Old 05-10-2009, 09:45 AM
4Mal's Avatar
Endorsing Curmudgeon: Mal's Kitchen Cruelties ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Columbia River Gorge
Supporting Member
Cloning an Avatar SB112 doesn't cost much more than that and it's a cab that is giggable ...

Good on ya for getting the idea and taking it to completion. This is to my mind an answer looking for a question though...
__________________
I think I'd know normal if I saw it ... 'Calvin

Last edited by 4Mal : 05-10-2009 at 09:47 AM.
  #9  
Old 05-10-2009, 10:20 AM
liam_g's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: nashville, tn
Supporting Member
Wow, tough audience this morning.

Personally, I think it's cool. It answers the question posed by the OP's needs just fine, and like he said, he wants to use his head, which makes this -- for his needs -- a much better solution than a practice combo.

Cheers,
Liam
__________________
Brian James Band
  #10  
Old 05-10-2009, 10:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Paul, MN
I'll bet two of them would work fine for rehearsals (And perhaps gigs), plus with the two small cabs that would be very portable. Lovin the 2 X 112.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommygunn View Post
Eh... I don't know much bout him anyways. I'd think the flecktones mainstream....
  #11  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:00 AM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
All things considered it's probably a better cab than most commercial 1x12s under the $300 price point, and the equal of more than a few that go for a lot more.
  #12  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:24 AM
BassmanPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
GOLD Supporting Member
Looking through the ports, it doesn't look like you have any stuffing in the cabinet.

Paul
  #13  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:27 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambria, CA (Central Coast)
Good job and attention to design detail.

Line the cab with a cheap foam mattress topper!

EDIT: Paul and I posted simultaneously...he beat me to it.
__________________
Larger avatar photo here.
My usual stock answers: No, Tuesday, 12
  #14  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:40 PM
Jim C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Supporting Member
Regardless of the design or performance, good on you for making something rather than just talking about it!

Hope it meets all your needs and expectations.

With that said, I personaly like building from professional plans as the material cost is insignificant relative to my time and the cost of a decent speaker.
  #15  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:45 PM
Passinwind's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia River Gorge, WA.
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Auricchio View Post
Good job and attention to design detail.

Line the cab with a cheap foam mattress topper!

EDIT: Paul and I posted simultaneously...he beat me to it.
The OP mentioned in his linked text that he used polyester batt.
  #16  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:04 PM
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: L.A. (the Valley)
I read your blog piece on the cab and am impressed. Not only does it look like it can handle the competition from a couple acoustic guitars and a small drum kit, esthetically it looks like it would fit into the decor of a coffeehouse. Good job.
__________________
Fender 51 Reissue Club
Quote:
Originally Posted by grisezd
That's got everything that is good, all in one spot.
  #17  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:32 PM
Registered User

Builder: Bottom Line Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Why 4 tweeters?
__________________
If you can't respect your elders, learn to respect your betters.
Christian Praise and Worship Bassist Club #506
50+club #49
  #18  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by billfitzmaurice View Post
All things considered it's probably a better cab than most commercial 1x12s under the $300 price point, and the equal of more than a few that go for a lot more.
I take that as high praise indeed, far beyond my design goals of cheap, and easy to build.

I could save a few bucks with cheaper plywood (but I had never tried Baltic Birch- I'll never go back). I could have saved $10 or so with a simpler wiring solution for the piezos with a lower parts count (I wasn't sure going into it just how many would really be needed, and how much flexibility I'd need for attenutating them). A different grill solution could also save a few bucks (I had never tried this one).

I think with some cost cutting you could build one for $125. Whether doing so is useful to you or not is certainly open to debate

What actually started me down the 'cheap road' was the fact that there were so many good improvements "for just a few dollars more ..." I had a hard time deciding where to draw the line. My solution to that dilemma, was to make everything as cheap as possible, and that lead to this design.

As others noticed, I took the pics before I stuffed the box. I did do a little bracing, but only so far as gluing strips on the long sides where it is likely to flex (but that's more accurately reinforcement than bracing).

How does it sound? I don't own a spectrum analyzer, and that's the only way to really describe it accurately. Compared to the SWR 2x10C Combo box, it sounds deeper to me and not as sterile. There may be some mid-loss between 1k and 3k (at the very least I have no reason to expect 'smooth') and the 12 will be beaming before the piezos really start responding. Still, that's better than some combo's I have had in the past.

I have made repeated mention of the power/spl issue. This thing may be quite loud, but the last thing I want to do is have some teenager save all their nickels to build one of these, with the expectation it will handle a Metallica gig- it's the wrong box for that. I fully expect it will handle acoustic, quiet gigs and coffee house stuff just fine.

I don't need another box these days, but if I did, I'd try something similar with a 10". If you decide the piezo's don't do it for you, your investment for them is about $1 each.
  #19  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog1 View Post
Why 4 tweeters?
The little guys aren't very loud (92db). A pair should be about 95db and 4 of them about 98db (the woofer is 97db).

Keep in mind that these numbers are really approximations and the actual sensitivity varies with frequency. I knew that (1) would be too quiet, I thought maybe (2) would be a little quiet, and (4) might be a little loud. I figured if I could switch in different combinations, the problem was solved.

From the little I have used it, 4 of them is a pretty good match.
  #20  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:12 PM
DukeLeJeune's Avatar
only immortal for a limited time

Owner & speaker designer, AudioKinesis
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Preston, Idaho
GOLD Supporting Member
Nice job, Schecter4! I think your claims about the cab's capabilities are probably on the conservative side relative to what many manufacturers would have said. Innovative use of the four tweeters there, to get efficiency up. A line source like that will also tend to roll off the top octave a bit through destructive interference, and that probably helps smoothe the tweeters and keep them from sounding edgy. I can see that as a very valid way to employ a bunch of cheap piezos. And you lined them up vertically instead of horizontally or clustered, so you did it right. Distinctive good looks too - probably just like its builder.
__________________
Full review of Thunderchild 112AF in Issue #7 of Bass Gear Magazine
primeVibe seasons your instrument for richer tone
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 AM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.