|  | 
05-31-2010, 01:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: The Park of Lexington | | | 3or4
Sign in to disble this ad
Why aren't 3x10's arent more popular than 4x10's. | 
05-31-2010, 01:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Westfield, MA, USA | | | Well a 4x10's one more, innit?
__________________
faster than a laser bullet
louder than an atom bomb
| 
05-31-2010, 03:37 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: The Park of Lexington | | | Well, yes. I see your point. I guess what I was gettin' at was the fact of bassists that like the 4x10, but want lesser weight/easier to haul, and don't wanna go to a 2x10. Wouldn't the "in-between" be optimum? I wasn't trying to troll, I was just looking for honest opinions, that's all. | 
05-31-2010, 03:41 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Toronto Ontario Canada | | | Odd number of drivers equate to odd impedances. Not too much of a problem for a SS amp but difficult for a tube amp.
Paul | 
05-31-2010, 03:45 PM
|  | Less Ebay, more Mel Bay | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Phoenix, AZ | | | The impedance, as BassmanPaul says, is an issue. Two 3x10s is almost always going to equal a less than 4 ohm load or a more than 4 ohm load. No one wants a 6 ohm 6x10 or a 3 ohm 6x10, since 4 ohms tends to be the minimum for a lot of amps.
__________________
Dingwall ABZ 5
Lots of pedals
Markbass SD1200 -> fEarful 1515/66 (or TC115N) Red Complex | 
05-31-2010, 03:52 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Layton,Utah | | Quote:
Originally Posted by projectMalamute Well a 4x10's one more, innit? | In which it will take an amp that goes to 11! | 
05-31-2010, 03:57 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: The Park of Lexington | | Ok, gotcha.  But what about in the case of a combo(MarkBass CMD103H), or powered cabs(Bergantino IP310). Is there just not a trend in these designs?  | 
05-31-2010, 07:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: WNC, USA | | | Also:
1) Buyers tend to favor "traditional" looking designs.
2) A 3x10 isn't really all that much smaller or lighter than a 4x10.
__________________
You be the ninth.
| 
06-01-2010, 01:11 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles | | Quote:
Originally Posted by boing Also:
1) Buyers tend to favor "traditional" looking designs.
2) A 3x10 isn't really all that much smaller or lighter than a 4x10. |
My Epi UL310-S1 is 47lbs. The UL410-S2 is 63.8lbs. My UL310
is as loud as many 4x10's on the market and almost 17lbs less
weight than the UL410. A big plus for me, is that it sounds
great at low volume. It doesn't need to be pushed to work.
I don't know.....I'm kinda liking the 310 idea. | 
06-01-2010, 02:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland | | Quote:
Originally Posted by BassmanPaul Odd number of drivers equate to odd impedances. Not too much of a problem for a SS amp but difficult for a tube amp.
Paul | That's my issue with them too.
In many ways I can see the benifits of a 3x10 vertical array, gets the speakers that bit closer to ear level. But the impedance being out of the conventional 4/8 ohm region, meh.
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
| 
06-01-2010, 07:24 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | I'm surprised they aren't popular, but really when you get away from Talkbass most folks are playing very traditional cabs from traditional companies. I can't believe the number of folks who lug around those old Ampeg and GK cabs, but they do. Of course, I have an IP310 which takes a bit of lugging also, but it'll bury any 410 on the market in short order. My guess is that if GK or Ampeg made a medium-weight 310 that Guitar Center would stock, they'd fly out of the doors simply because of the name and exposure they'd get. Most players have never even heard of the companies who have made 310's. Talkbass really is a very small portion of the bass playing community.
__________________
Jason
| 
06-01-2010, 07:33 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: The Park of Lexington | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Eublet I'm surprised they aren't popular, but really when you get away from Talkbass most folks are playing very traditional cabs from traditional companies. I can't believe the number of folks who lug around those old Ampeg and GK cabs, but they do. Of course, I have an IP310 which takes a bit of lugging also, but it'll bury any 410 on the market in short order. My guess is that if GK or Ampeg made a medium-weight 310 that Guitar Center would stock, they'd fly out of the doors simply because of the name and exposure they'd get. Most players have never even heard of the companies who have made 310's. Talkbass really is a very small portion of the bass playing community. | +1 to that for sure | 
06-01-2010, 03:14 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: WNC, USA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by B String My Epi UL310-S1 is 47lbs. The UL410-S2 is 63.8lbs. My UL310
is as loud as many 4x10's on the market and almost 17lbs less
weight than the UL410. A big plus for me, is that it sounds
great at low volume. It doesn't need to be pushed to work.
I don't know.....I'm kinda liking the 310 idea. | IINM, the Series IIs are already significantly heavier than their S1 counterparts, even with the same number of drivers, so that may not be the fairest of comparisons. But yes, there are differences. I don't think "The Market" is generally that discerning, though.
If Jim Bergantino made a tweeterless, vertically arrayed AE310, I'd buy one.  But I'm not "The Market".
__________________
You be the ninth.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |