|  | 
08-02-2010, 10:26 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: The Woodlands, TX | | | 410 or 2x210?
Sign in to disble this ad
So, 410 or 2x210 vertical stack?
(Same brand/models between the 210s and 410) | 
08-02-2010, 10:28 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Appalachian State University | | | Is 410 8 or 4 ohms?
What amp are you using?
__________________
-.---.----..
| 
08-02-2010, 10:34 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Tempe, Arizona | | | 2 vertical 2x10's | 
08-02-2010, 04:39 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: near Ft. Worth, TX, U.S.A. | | | I've been faced with this same choice as I plan to trade up to lighter speaker cabinets.
The economic argument is in favor of the 410. Stick to one manufacturer and product line, and one of the 410s is cheaper than 2 of the 210s.
The modularity argument is in favor of the 2x210. For something small, just bring the 210, for a larger gig bring both.
The portability argument will depend on you and your situation and the cabs you're looking at.
The sound argument can also boil down to the individual cabs you're looking at, and I'll let people wiser than me in such things discuss it. | 
08-02-2010, 04:41 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: The Woodlands, TX | | Quote:
Originally Posted by 4StringTheorist I've been faced with this same choice as I plan to trade up to lighter speaker cabinets.
The economic argument is in favor of the 410. Stick to one manufacturer and product line, and one of the 410s is cheaper than 2 of the 210s.
The modularity argument is in favor of the 2x210. For something small, just bring the 210, for a larger gig bring both.
The portability argument will depend on you and your situation and the cabs you're looking at.
The sound argument can also boil down to the individual cabs you're looking at, and I'll let people wiser than me in such things discuss it. |
Yup, everything you've mentioned is currently what I'm thinking over. Eden 2x210XST (or 1 xst and 1 xlt )
or Eden 410XST
Sure is quite a bit cheaper for the 410... | 
08-02-2010, 05:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Wausau, WI | | | Typically the two 210 cabs can go deeper a bit better than the 410 because there is a bit more internal cab volume per speaker.
Two 210 cabs vertically aligned will allow for better dispersal of mids. With the 410, each vertical alignment of tens will cancel some frequencies out at various points relative to you and the cab placement.
Two 210's stacked vertically also place the top speakers closer to your ears making it easier to hear yourself.
Two 210's are more modular and with each one being lighter than one 410, easier to move. Also a 410 is harder to fit in some vehicles.
Any one speaker damaged in a 210 will still allow you to use the other 210. If you blow one speaker in the 410, the others may follow suit soon.
I don't see much advantage to a 410 versus two 210's except perhaps price.
__________________
fEARful...that's about as good as it gets.
| 
08-02-2010, 05:20 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Sacramento/Pacifica, CA | | | I've got a 4x10 and a 2x10. I find myself more often than not using the 2x10 more than the 4x10. It's more portable and sounds just about as good. Both cabs are neo's and are both 4 ohm cabs.
__________________ Carvin Club #2-bass/#23-amp Fender Jazz Bass Club #4 BTB Club #8 Olympic White Bass Club #12 19mm Club #25 The Passive Club #29 Fender MIA Club #207 Ibanez Club #234 The Fretless Club #237 | 
08-02-2010, 05:30 PM
| | Registered User Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: New Hampshire | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundogue Typically the two 210 cabs can go deeper a bit better than the 410 because there is a bit more internal cab volume per speaker.
Two 210 cabs vertically aligned will allow for better dispersal of mids. With the 410, each vertical alignment of tens will cancel some frequencies out at various points relative to you and the cab placement.
Two 210's stacked vertically also place the top speakers closer to your ears making it easier to hear yourself.
Two 210's are more modular and with each one being lighter than one 410, easier to move. Also a 410 is harder to fit in some vehicles.
Any one speaker damaged in a 210 will still allow you to use the other 210. If you blow one speaker in the 410, the others may follow suit soon.
I don't see much advantage to a 410 versus two 210's except perhaps price. | +1 on all counts. And you can't leave half of a 410 at home when you don't need it. | 
08-02-2010, 08:23 PM
|  | Dr. Jim | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Denton TX, Kailua HI, New York | | Lot's of good advice and insights offered already, so I'll add my perspective in brief.
I have 2x210 (Epifani) AND an Epifani UL1 410. The possibilities are very cool.
210: (either UL1 or NYC) 8 ohm, One carry with Shuttle 6.0 and 2 basses in a Mono duo backpack.
2x210: major booty, two carries. Loud loud loud.
410: (4 ohm) Loud and elegant. Takes up less total space than 2x210 in my Elantra Touring wagon.
210 + 410: Loud booty badness---but when you need it, you got to have it.
I have ventured no further.
If I had to choose, I would probably take an 8 ohm 210 and a 4 ohm 410. Each driver gets equal power. However, I am somewhat addicted to the 2x210 booty, i.e., superior low end and low mid response. 
__________________ Sadowsky RV4 P/J
Valenti Fretless 5 #19
1850 Tirolean Upright
55 & 71 P-basses
Lakland 55-01D
08 Fiesta Red RW Jazz
Crest CA6/ART tube channel
Mesa M9
Epifani UL1 410 & 210, NYC 210 www.jamescarr.net | 
08-02-2010, 08:52 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: St. Louis | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Carr Lot's of good advice and insights offered already, so I'll add my perspective in brief.
I have 2x210 (Epifani) AND an Epifani UL1 410. The possibilities are very cool.
210: (either UL1 or NYC) 8 ohm, One carry with Shuttle 6.0 and 2 basses in a Mono duo backpack.
2x210: major booty, two carries. Loud loud loud.
410: (4 ohm) Loud and elegant. Takes up less total space than 2x210 in my Elantra Touring wagon.
210 + 410: Loud booty badness---but when you need it, you got to have it.
I have ventured no further.
If I had to choose, I would probably take an 8 ohm 210 and a 4 ohm 410. Each driver gets equal power. However, I am somewhat addicted to the 2x210 booty, i.e., superior low end and low mid response.  | 210 and a 410 sounds like a good idea to me.
__________________
When all else fails, turn the bass up.
US. Peavey Club Member # 109 Official "Official" Club #4
| 
08-02-2010, 09:08 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: austin,tx | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundogue Typically the two 210 cabs can go deeper a bit better than the 410 because there is a bit more internal cab volume per speaker.
Two 210 cabs vertically aligned will allow for better dispersal of mids. With the 410, each vertical alignment of tens will cancel some frequencies out at various points relative to you and the cab placement.
Two 210's stacked vertically also place the top speakers closer to your ears making it easier to hear yourself.
Two 210's are more modular and with each one being lighter than one 410, easier to move. Also a 410 is harder to fit in some vehicles.
Any one speaker damaged in a 210 will still allow you to use the other 210. If you blow one speaker in the 410, the others may follow suit soon.
I don't see much advantage to a 410 versus two 210's except perhaps price. | +2
I can't see many things favoring the 410. Maybe some personal situations like you've got plenty of vehicle to haul it but parking, unloading, locking up and making one trip in the bar and being able to be loud is for some reason of utmost importance to you. And that the volume may come a little cheaper, not enough compared to the benefits of a vertical 10 stack to make it worth it IMO. If you have a smallish car it's a heckuva lot easier to fit several smaller things in it than one large thing. | 
08-03-2010, 01:09 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Dallas, TX | | | 2 2x10s Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibbsalot Yup, everything you've mentioned is currently what I'm thinking over. Eden 2x210XST (or 1 xst and 1 xlt )
or Eden 410XST
Sure is quite a bit cheaper for the 410... | I'm using an Eden 210XST on the bottom and an Eden 210XLT on the top (both 8 ohms) quite often now. I'll use my Eden WT550 or sometimes my Mesa 400+ with these cabs. A pretty good combination but I'm starting to think I wish I had a 6x10 cab. I don't own any 4x10 cabs.
dave
__________________
2000 Warwick Thumb 5
2007 Warwick Flamin' Blonde 5
1999 Warwick Streamer LX 5
1999 Warwick FNA Jazz 5 fretless
Demeter/Crown/Aguilar amplification | 
08-03-2010, 03:28 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: South East Cans Ass | | |
__________________
Rickenmodder Club #3
I just want to drink till Im not thirsty and I just want to sleep till Im not tired.
| 
08-03-2010, 04:24 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopper | for best results, lining up the cones evenly is the way to go. makes a slight difference but a noticeable one imho.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |