Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-11-2012, 04:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Aguilar vrs Carvin

I am looking at two bass amp setups

1. Aguilar Tone Hammer 500 which has 500 watts in 4 ohm
With. DB212 cabinet that weighs 7o pounds.
I have heard the DB 410 cabinet which is too heavy for me so I am thinking the DB212 which is 28 pounds lighter with casters would be a better choice. I am not going to buy a second cab so I am thinking of getting a 4ohm DB 212 cabinet. TOTAL COST $1,800

2. Carvin BX500 which also has 500 watts in 4ohm.
a four 10'cabinet which weighs 72 pounds. TOTAL COST $700

I am wondering if anyone has heard both bass amps and what your opinion is of each. I have not heard the Carvin but I have heard the Aguilar. Rich clean, less top end than other company's.

Even if both amps were the same price is Aguilar really a better quality product or since it is is small mom and pop shop with NYC rent does it just cost more due to their overhead costs?
  #2  
Old 11-11-2012, 05:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
The Aguilar rig is far superior, imo, and will sound great. Carvin, though they're a good option for the price, always sound sterile and weak to me. You should try to test drive both, and decide with your ears. And, even though you expect to only use the one cab, it's still a better option to get the 8 ohm version. The volume difference will be negligable, but cutting off the option to add that 2nd cab later could be a huge mistake.
__________________
edit signature
  #3  
Old 11-11-2012, 05:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Diego CA.
A plus with the Carvin is that it will run a 2 ohm load, so you can run 2X4 ohm cabs if you find one cab is not enough. You will get the full 500 watts either way. Also I have a BX500 and love it. Have never used the Aguilar but have heard one and it also sounded very good.
  #4  
Old 11-11-2012, 05:19 PM
MostlyBass's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oak Park, IL
Supporting Member
I own the BX500 an also played through the Aguilar. Both are great amps. The Aguilar has more bite and grit but the Carvin has a huge variety of tones.

If you're looking for aggressive tones get the Aguilar. I do like having the 2 ohm option and all the eq flexibility of the BX500.

Both rock!
  #5  
Old 11-11-2012, 09:49 PM
B String's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Supporting Member
It's like the old joke: "What's the difference between the Volkswagen Bug and the Mercedes?" They both have 4 wheels. They both have 4 doors, engine, and a steering wheel. What could the difference possibly be?? Get it?
  #6  
Old 11-11-2012, 10:23 PM
MysticMichael's Avatar
Hip No Ties
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York, NY
Send a message via ICQ to MysticMichael Send a message via AIM to MysticMichael
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Lantern View Post
I am looking at two bass amp setups

1. Aguilar Tone Hammer 500 which has 500 watts in 4 ohm
With. DB212 cabinet that weighs 7o pounds.
I have heard the DB 410 cabinet which is too heavy for me so I am thinking the DB212 which is 28 pounds lighter with casters would be a better choice. I am not going to buy a second cab so I am thinking of getting a 4ohm DB 212 cabinet. TOTAL COST $1,800

2. Carvin BX500 which also has 500 watts in 4ohm.
a four 10'cabinet which weighs 72 pounds. TOTAL COST $700

I am wondering if anyone has heard both bass amps and what your opinion is of each. I have not heard the Carvin but I have heard the Aguilar. Rich clean, less top end than other company's.

Even if both amps were the same price is Aguilar really a better quality product or since it is is small mom and pop shop with NYC rent does it just cost more due to their overhead costs?
First of all, I would de-couple the costs of the heads from their respective cabs, in order to compare units head to head (pun intended). It's a much more useful process.

Altogether, I think you'd find the Aguilar to have more overall tonal character. But the Carvin is no slouch, and is considered an excellent, affordable Class D alternative around here.

If money is not an issue, choose the one that has "the sound" for you. Otherwise, select on the basis of superior bang for the buck. (If it's the latter consideration, the Carvin should win.)

Secondly, depending on the overall musical application you have in mind, I know you could do a lot better than the generic Carvin 4x10 cab - with a possible exception if it's Carvin's BRX 4x10. So is it?

My suggestion: Consider a pair of quality 8-ohm 2x10 cabs, stacked vertically. Or a good 4-ohm 2x12, with drivers vertically oriented. Or a nice pair of 8-ohm 1x12 cabs, again stacked vertically.

Depending on your performance & tone goals, along with budget, either look at mainline commercial brands, i.e. Avatar, GK, Mesa, Genz Benz, etc. Or consider something boutique - if you can: AudioKinesis, fEARful, Baer, etc.

MM
__________________
"If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is: infinite."

— William Blake
  #7  
Old 11-11-2012, 10:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Carvin

The BX500 + BRX10.4 kicks serious butt and would be my choice. Can't justify spending well over twice as much for the Aggie.
I don't quite understand the "sterile + weak" comment. The EQ section can go from bright + sparkly to fat and boomy no problem. I have an MB10 with a BX250 head built in and it shakes my walls with punch and tone. The key is in the semi-parametric mid controls. Set the low-mid FREQ to 100 and boost the level to around 3:00 and the amp comes to life. The DRIVE control really thickens up the sound also.
  #8  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:40 PM
Munjibunga's Avatar
Total Hyper-Elite Member

Independent Contractor to Bass San Diego
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Groom Lake, NV
GOLD Supporting Member
I wouldn't say "sterile and weak." Maybe a little "boxy and cardboardy." But just a little.
__________________
Я хочу свою курицу для ужина и я хочу её сейчас!
  #9  
Old 11-12-2012, 04:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
I have a new active Fender Jazz bass and I am playing jazz and praise and worship music.

With the jazz pickups I want a amp that will offer a nice full sound but will also allow me to hear the top end. I played the Aguilar 500 with their 4 10 cabinet. With boosting the tweeter knob, I was able to get a great sound that I really liked. The only problem is I cannot lug a 98 pound cabinet. I thought about getting two 210 cabinets but the 210 cabinet is only 10 pounds lighter than their Db212 cabinet that has casters. So transporting the DB212 would be much easier for me.
I played through 2 SL 112 cabinets and found it lacked the low end I wanted. It sounded good but with not a good match. If I played my steady G&L 2500 bass the SL speakers would have been great with its larger fuller sound, but not with my Fender Jazz. The DB212 received a stellar review here. http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f15/ag...2-ex112-885680

So at this point I am leaning more towards the TH500 with the DB212 cabinet. I believe the Carvin with graphs EQ that it would probably offer more tonal sounds. But I believe the Aguilar amp has a more solid sound that I would like more...but I only heard Carvin through YouTube which you can't get a correct impression on.

Last edited by Green Lantern : 11-12-2012 at 04:36 AM.
  #10  
Old 11-12-2012, 04:38 AM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Fender Basses, Ampeg, Curt Mangan Strings
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South Shore, Massachusetts
The Aguilar is much better.
__________________
"If you don't want the truth don't ask. Make up your own like everyone else does". (Michael Pare as Eddie Wilson/Joe West in Eddie and The Cruisers II).
  #11  
Old 11-12-2012, 09:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Hampshire
The quality of a product is reflected in the product's warranty length. That number is calculated using statistical methods that are rigorous and nontrivial. There's nothing more meaningful than warranty length when it comes to comparing how well two products designed for equivalent use are engineered and assembled.
__________________

icango.net

bandmix profile
  #12  
Old 11-12-2012, 09:58 AM
brotherbassj's Avatar
Registered User

Jim Dunlop USA, King Kong Cases, Golden Eagle Energy Drink
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia
Supporting Member
I would say to pick the Aguilar db 212 over the Carvin 410. I think that the Aguilar tone hammer is a great head, especially cool for rock, however if I was playing praise and worship I might pick the carvin as it honestly has more variety of tone and maybe more clear without imparting amp character ror coloring (hence maybe why we got a "Sterile" comment on the carvin) I am a huge fan of the db 12 series of Aguilar and own 2 db112's. The 212 sounds bigger than the two single twelves. I have had the Carvin and liked it alot, however it was beat out by a little mark 2 and then a thunderfunk 550B. Ive played a tonehammer but do not own one as I have been happy with my amp tone. Hope this helps a little
__________________
Spector/Wick/Jazz DLX-->Thunderfunk 550B/Mesa M6-->Aguilar db112 & 112NT
Spector 342 Wick 226
"We're all about tolerance. Well except for worship rocker, who defies tolerance......"
  #13  
Old 11-12-2012, 11:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
They're both excellent heads. As has been alluded to, the Aguilar will have more "character." The Carvin has a modern, "transparent" voicing.

Now as far as cabs go, I'm going to have to recommend the Aguilars over the Carvins. I love the new B and BX series amps, but I've never been a huge fan of Carvin's speaker boxes. They just sound very boxy to me and seem to clip way too soon.
__________________
"You will find the TalkBass Off Topic a wealth of fine medical, legal, and relationship advice. BANK ON IT." - hover
  #14  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:40 PM
B String's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Supporting Member
As much as the new Carvin basses are approaching world class, (in my opinion) especially at the price point, their amps are still not there for the most part. I had a BX500 when they first came out. Took it on a few gigs. We spent most of the night playing with knobs and faders trying to get a good sound. We did, but it took a lot of effort. After a few gigs the amp broke. I still had to pay the shipping back even though it was still in the trial period and broken just because I didn't want to keep it. This left a bad taste with me.
Also, all the extra eq circuitry and bells and whistles made the head noisy. The TH500 sounded great right out of the box.
  #15  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Going for the Aguilar and DB212
Thanks
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 PM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.