|  | 
11-20-2012, 04:49 PM
| | | | Ampeg B-15 Models Hi Everyone,
I'm looking into purchasing a B-15 and was wondering the sonic differences between the 1960's models and the 70's models. Also how does the newer 100 watt model compare? What is your preference?
Also, what would be a ballpark fair price for a good condition amp? The ones I have seen are in the ballpark of $1000+.
Thank you! | 
11-20-2012, 05:02 PM
|  | Registered User Born Again Tubey | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Stuck in traffic -NY & CT | | Jess Oliver's legacy - AMPEG PORTAFLEX CLUB part 9
huge thread. at least post your questions there for the experts.
__________________ Fodera; Fender; Scrolls; 70's Ampegs ; Eden; Markbass; Warmoth ; Gibson Bass; Tbird 76; JAEbird 2; SVT 7; OLD TUBE AMPS | 
11-20-2012, 06:47 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | 60's models are a little brighter and don't go quite as low in the lows as the 70's models. I prefer the 60's models, some prefer the 70's models. No right or wrong answer, merely matters of taste.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
11-20-2012, 06:51 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montréal,Qc,Canada | | | I have both a 63 and a 76. The 60's are 45 watts, the 70's 60 watts.
i do prefer the 76 because of its power, low end and headroom. | 
11-20-2012, 07:01 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | The only B-15's in the 60's were either 25 or 30w. The 63 model is the B-15NB, which is likely what you have, and it's 25w. The 70's B-15's are the B-15N and B-15S. The N was 30w, the S 60w. I suspect your 70's model is the S, correct?
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
11-20-2012, 07:34 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montréal,Qc,Canada | | Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM The only B-15's in the 60's were either 25 or 30w. The 63 model is the B-15NB, which is likely what you have, and it's 25w. The 70's B-15's are the B-15N and B-15S. The N was 30w, the S 60w. I suspect your 70's model is the S, correct? | Yes the B15-S is what i have in 70's.
And the 63 is a B15-N which I thought was rated at 45 watts. I stand corrected, I just looked in my Ampeg book.
Thanks, no wonder why I love the headroom on the B15-S  | 
11-20-2012, 07:45 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Ya, I seem to be one of the very few who can get away with the 25w B-15 on gigs. I ain't complaining, though!
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
11-21-2012, 05:53 AM
| | Banned | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montréal,Qc,Canada | | Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM Ya, I seem to be one of the very few who can get away with the 25w B-15 on gigs. I ain't complaining, though! | LOL
I hear you!
I think that the B15-S is the best Portaflex IMO. It was my first amp that I carried everywhere. I took the head off the wooden plate for transport and to avoid too much vibrations on the tubes. It is still heavy but not as much as any other powerful amp that were made after this one.
Now I use the head with a 4x10 Bergantino and it really rocks. | 
11-21-2012, 06:53 AM
| | | | I'm a sucker for the early 60's B-15 amps and cabinets. Others go for the 70's tone. They are both great sounding but slightly different.
Adding a second cab, as Jimmy does, can help with a little more volume. But it is still a 25W or 30W amp. The wattage needed will be dictated by the type of music, the size of the venue, and whether or not you are mic'ing the cab.
Did I mention that there is also a cool factor in using a B-15?
Prices are all over the place. It depends on where you live, the time of the year, and condition. Prices tend to be up a bit now because people are buying. In general they continually keep increasing because of demand. I've recently seen a 65 B-15 for $1200, a 70's model for $1850, and a B15S for $1200. These are all good prices. Good B-15's can sell for over $2000. There are always deals to be found. Be patient and hope for some luck.
How much work needs to be done is a big factor. We are talking about amps that could be 50 years old! Don't underestimate the need to have a tech service the amp when you get it. Buying an already serviced amp is a big plus that can save you a lot of money. Otherwise it can cost you a lot depending on how far you want to go. It depends if you want the amp to be just gigable or you want to take if further and get into a restoration. An older unused amp might need new tubes and some components, a good cleaning inside the chassis and out, the power supply might need to be re-caped, a re-cone or speaker replacement, the cab might have buzzes, and it needs a three-conductor power cord.
__________________
Official Ampeg Portaflex Club #89
| 
11-21-2012, 10:52 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Albany IL | | | I have a '63 B15, but truthfully prefer the tone from the 70's models. I also really like the B15R (100 watter) and I own a 50 watt Oliver which has a pair of 7027 tubes (same as a B18 or B15ND) that sounds really good. The extra wattage on that makes a big difference for live use. When I do run my '63 live, I used to run a B-100R alongside it - but now I use a B15 extension cab and we mic it up. Lot's of variations in the B15 / Portaflex family, and you can't really go wrong with any of the vintage units. Even the solid state fliptops from the 60's are excellent choices if the price is right.
__________________
I play bass - not treble!
------------------------ Official Ampeg Portaflex Club Member #76
Official Ampeg Club Member #511
Thunderbird Club Member #11 | 
11-21-2012, 10:54 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Ypsilanti, MI 48197 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by beans-on-toast Adding a second cab, as Jimmy does, can help with a little more volume. But it is still a 25W or 30W amp. | B-18 head FTW.
__________________
aborgman Lagerhaus5 for your Rock & Roll needs.
| 
11-21-2012, 08:16 PM
| | | | Thanks for the great replies everyone! I'm looking to mainly use the amp for recording so wattage isn't a huge concern. I guess I'll just keep my eyes open for one that needs minimal work! | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |