Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver BC
Ampeg B200R vs Kustom Tuck and Roll - which is louder?

Sign in to disble this ad
Hello all,

I currently play bass in a soul band with two drummers, guitar and hammond organ. The band isn't particularly loud, but I have been starting to notice that my Ampeg B200R isn't loud enough for medium sized rooms. It's totally great in the jam space, and has amazing tone (as most would agree) but definitely seems too small for the gigs. I have an opportunity to buy a Kustom 200. Now I know James Jamerson played a Kustom for his larger shows, and I love the way they look! My question, for anyone that has the answer, is will the Kustom be any louder than my Ampeg? It has the 2x15 cab and the guy says it's 200 watts, although I think he might be mistaken. Truthfully, I don't know that much about the Kustoms, but if I can sound more like Jamerson and hear myself doing it, that would be ideal. Any help would be appreciated, otherwise, I'll just have to find out myself.

Thanks



Last edited by maxsample : 01-15-2012 at 09:49 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
The Kustom is 200 100 watts, and it will probably go louder, due to the two fifteens. I doubt that you will like the tone as much as the B200R. IMO. That said, there has been a lot of soul bass played through the Kustom 200.

BTW that is a great looking Kustom. Is it yours?
__________________
Fender Jazz Bass Club #898; Official Ampeg Portaflex Club #151; "It's "Ain't No Sunshine," for crying out loud. EVERYONE JUST CALM DOWN!!!" JimmyM

Last edited by John D : 01-17-2012 at 08:23 PM.
  #3  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I used to have a Kustom like that (Tuck N' Roll 200) and I had to sell it because it was too loud, so I assume it'll be loud enough for your needs... It literally shook so stuff off of my shelves
  #4  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver BC
thanks, obviously I will still have to try it out first, but it's good to know that it's not a waste of my time. also, I believe there's an old saying: "if it's too loud, turn it down." - weezer
  #5  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver BC
oh, and no that is not my amp, just a stock photo, but it supposedly look like this one. I haven't yet seen it
  #6  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
The Ampeg Rocket Bass combos sound incredible!
__________________
Washington State Bassist Club #40, Wood Matters Club Member #18
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy"
  #7  
Old 01-15-2012, 10:30 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
Takes me back to my childhood. My high school chorus director played bass and had that exact rig in black. Sounded good at the time. Then he got a 77 Acoustic 370/301. Blew the Kustom out of the water. Then I got a 73 V4B/810 from my cousin's ex husband. Blew the Acoustic out of the water.

What's the lesson here? Well of course it's get an SVT and an 810 But really, it's that Kustom was good for a little while, and for sure some classic bands and players used it, and it will get louder than the B200R because it's two 15"s and 200w. But I'm sorry to all the old Kustom fans but I just don't think they're good sounding amps.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #8  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver BC
fair points, I really like the svt/810 rig but it's too expensive and large for me. I like the kustom for it's size and unique appearance, but as with anything, I'll have to wait to try it later this week and either it will make a believer of me or not. thanks for the thoughts
  #9  
Old 01-17-2012, 09:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Metro Atlanta, Ga.
K200-B

I just corrected a statement I made in a similar post from last week; it bares repeating in this thread.


I chose Kustom, because on my side of the tracks in those days, we never heard of Acoustic, Sunn or SVT'S.

My only experience then, was with a friend's Ampeg flip-top SB12: Instant Mo-town and JPJ tone...Guaranteed!. Great for bedroom practice but too weak to gig with.

Of course the Kustoms loooked coolest of all..and they were modern; Solid State.

Rear panel of mine reads: 100 Watts RMS@ 8 Ohms. The 2x15 cab is rated @ 8ohms, so it should be 100 watts, but I think it's closer to 50 watts with one cab and 100 watts with a second 2x15, which is why they are more suited to go against Fender Supers and lower wattage guitar amps; NEVER against a Marshall guitar amp of any wattage.

Secret to mine is running a Furman PQ 3 in front..no more complaints.

Mine has been highly reliable; always powers-up and runs. Only time I ever employed the Lifetime WARRANTY card was a problem I CAUSED during a home-made Rick-O-Sound experiment. "Lifetime WARRANTY " fully covered my mistake; no questions asked. Old Kustoms are highly reliable products.
Thanks...
  #10  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville TN
The "200 watts" is indeed an inflated number.

I've got an old (1971) K250 with the 2x15 cab and I got an actual power output around 130 watts at clipping into a 4 ohm load, IIRC.

Power level IMHO was adequate for a typical classic rock or soul bar gig, but I wouldn't call it loud enough to compete with metal guitarists and 4x12 stacks.

Reliability: the "lifetime warranty" only was valid when the company was in existence up until the early 70's. The rights to the Kustom name were sold off and transferred several times since then and the new Kustom definately will not honor the old warranty; I sincerely doubt they will even attempt to service an old amp.

While overall it was a fairly well built amp at the time (with IMHO one major flaw on the K250 at least, the output transistors are not heat-sinked to the outside but rather internally at the bottom of the amp) bear in mind that several of the small-signal transistors and IC's are quite obsolete. The amp definately will need all the electrolytic caps replaced and a grounded 3 prong power cord would be a wise retrofit.

Now don't get me wrong, the old Kustoms exude this kinda cool vibe to them and they sound smooth. Personally though I would not buy another Kustom rig.
  #11  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Metro Atlanta, Ga.
Bill...

Bill,
No great issue, but I did my home-made rick-o sound experiment around 1983-1984; resulting in blowing a fuse and welding it in on my '74 Acoustic 370 amp and killing the "bright"-side of my Kustom. I called around for authorized repairman for my amps, as both had a "Lifetime Warranty". [ I have no idea when the original warranty became obsolete , but it was after the mid 80's]. I made an appointment and went in to see Roger in Chamblee; just north of Atlanta..
The repairman, Roger, thoroughly tested both amps and replaced any and every component needed in both amps..while I watched and waited. He documented repairs; sent paperwork to both Acoustic and Kustom and sent me away with NO CHARGE repair bill. NO QUESTIONS ASKED.

Although both warranties are now totally obsolete, if anyone knows whereabouts of "Roger", he is a great bench repairman; Quiet, professional and thorough.

As for my Kustom; It still has the original cord with 2-prong plug. I have never had any issues with it; however I acknowledge my risk ....and when... if ever, I put the old K200 in for repaisr..I willl have the plug replaced. Until then..."If it ain't broke..don't fix it".
  #12  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:46 AM
BassmanPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by zon6c-f View Post
As for my Kustom; It still has the original cord with 2-prong plug. I have never had any issues with it; however I acknowledge my risk ....and when... if ever, I put the old K200 in for repaisr..I willl have the plug replaced. Until then..."If it ain't broke..don't fix it".
With the greatest of respect: until the amp has a three core power cable it certainly IS broke! Don't find out the hard way just how broke it is!!!!
__________________
Paul
  #13  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Meriden, CT
I liked the tone of my Kustom 250 head going into my Kustom 215, but I agree, its kinda lacking in headroom for the listed output.

BUT... When I plug my GK 800RB into the Kustom 215 cab, that monster rocks. Better than several other 215 cabs I've tried. You just "feel" the bass more with the Kustom cab. So try using the Kustom cab with another more powerful head if you want a bit more oomph.
__________________
Bass inventory (all 4 string/passive):
Fender Jazz Geddy Lee
Fender Jazz fretless
Washburn Force-8 Chicago BBR
Guild SB-202
Gem short scale
Aria 1930 fretless violin hollow body, scroll head
  #14  
Old 01-17-2012, 12:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Metro Atlanta, Ga.
Thanks...LOL..

Paul : No offense taken and no shocking surprises in 41 years, although at my age.maybe a shock wouldn't be so bad?...LOL..

cchorney: I agree. As I was forced to buy a more powerful amp, as most guitarists were using Marshalls by 1974. I bought my Acoustic 370 head and used it atop my Kustom cabinet for years. Looked odd? YES. Sounded great, too.

In late 1979, I bought my used Sunn 1-18 vh folded horn
[ horn loaded variant ] cab...I never heard such beautiful sounds from my bass until that moment. Kind of like pairing a Chevy engine with a Ford transmission but frankly, I favor the Sunn over the "correct" Acoustic 301 "W-Horn". I used my Kustom set for low volume gigs and practices and used the Acoustic/ Sunn for louder gigs.

A couple of years ago, my wife bought me a 1980's Marshall 1550; 1x15 Celestion bass cab. The Kustom head atop the little Marshall sounds beter than the Kustom/Kustom set-up. At least to my ears. And yes...looks even stanger than the Acoustic atop the T&R Kustom cab.

I also have a GC Acoustic B200 combo which is much smaller and much louder than the Kustom 200 [ AC B200: 200 watts RMS @ 4 ohms through a single 15" 4-ohm speaker]

Now all of it collects dust, as I have no gigs. I practice through head phones and either Line 6 or Pandora PBX 4-B.
  #15  
Old 01-17-2012, 01:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Supporting Member


The Kustom will be louder due to the two 15's.

Never liked the B200R as much as the B100R or the B50R for tone.
  #16  
Old 01-17-2012, 01:13 PM
johnk_10's Avatar
vintage bass nut

John K Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Supporting Member
the old tuck and roll K200's are rated at 100Watts RMS (200 watts peak).

to get everything out of it that you can, back then you were supposed to run two of their 8 ohm 2x15 cabs (each of their cabs had two 16 ohm fifteens), and prefereably with the more efficient JBL D140 option. IME, a K200 with four JBL is loud enough for just about any gig, and also IMO, they had great tone too.
  #17  
Old 01-17-2012, 06:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tallahassee
Kustom Tuck n Roll

It looks, to me, like you have a KB200A-1, 100 watts ,like the previous poster noted. The amps with the "200" on the faceplate should be a mid 70's model. Look up John Fogerty( forgot the link ), but has a lot of good info...Cheers..PS, Ive just bought a KB200A-2, with reverb, tremolo, and vibrato, that all works. It's the same color (Cascade) as your pic. It's not as loud as I remember them in the early 70's, but maybe I'm spoiled by todays gear...

Last edited by 4-stringB : 01-17-2012 at 06:11 PM. Reason: Beer
  #18  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:05 AM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnk_10 View Post
the old tuck and roll K200's are rated at 100Watts RMS (200 watts peak).
Never knew that. Always thought they were 200w RMS. That'll learn me to believe the model name
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #19  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
I can use mine for softer jobs ,but I always take my Mesa WA or BX 500 heads for louder jobs with Altec's they sound great
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	SR 5 & kustom.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	250.4 KB
ID:	246041  
  #20  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver BC
good to know, thank you everyone. I still don't actually own the amp, although I'm supposed to go look at it today. I play in a soul band, so loud guitarists aren't an issue, he is playing through a 30 watt 1x12 ampeg GU12, but there's a chopped hammond organ going through a twin, and a drummer on either side of me, plus the bass really drives the songs, as it should in a soul band! I'm playing the B200R now, and it's plenty loud enough at rehearsal, just doesn't cut it on a stage. I figure that with 2x15s it will push twice as much air and hopefully some of that will reach my ears, plus it'll almost always be going through the pa. I will update later if I end up buying it, thanks again to everyone.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.