|  | | 
12-16-2012, 10:17 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CL400Peavey I use fEARful cabs. | Ah. I'd love to hear one of those. I just can't throw that kind of money at an unknown, nor do I pretend that I can build anything beyond a folding chair.
__________________ Carvin 149/Carvin MB 4/Reverend 61/Ampeg 877/5 String 90/Ergo 33/L.O.G. 266/Chi-Love 3/California Bassists 65 Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM put a shirt on, dude. nobody wants to see that. | | 
12-16-2012, 11:12 AM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ric4682 Thanks for the quick response Jimmy! With the tweeter off would you say the HE is more vintage sounding? | Definitely.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
12-17-2012, 03:42 AM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Oh, sorry...never answered about the tweet in the PF cabs. I don't like tweeters, but that one is pretty nice, especially considering it's an inexpensive cab. It's a compression driver instead of a piezo, and the 2 volume presets for it were very well chosen IMHO. If you have to use a tweeter, you could do a lot worse as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
12-21-2012, 03:41 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Cortland, Ohio | | | Ok, I'm also looking at starting with an Ampeg SVT 115E, mainly due to the fact that I like the look of it much better than the vintage style of the PF's. However, I have read that it is only 200 Watts RMS @ 8 ohms. I am thinking of eventually getting a pair of these or possibly adding a svt210AV to it. Any thoughts on these ideas? | 
12-21-2012, 03:58 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | That 200w is a serious 200w before fartout, not before it blows up. Most cabs are rated for when they blow up but they'll fart out way earlier. The Ampeg Classic cabs are rated for when they fart out. No conventional 115 for bass is going to do much better than 200-250w before fartout anyway, regardless of what they tell you the power handling is.
As for pairing it with a 210av, might be interesting and may sound quite good, but I prefer matching cabs as to avoid potential phasing problems. Some of my gigs I have enough problem with cancellations from boundary effects that I don't need to add to it with phasing.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
12-21-2012, 04:05 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Cortland, Ohio | | | Awesome, thanks! Would you then consider it a better quality cab/build than the PF115? Or is that kinda subjective? | 
12-21-2012, 04:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Tasmania, Australia | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by mbernard110 Awesome, thanks! Would you then consider it a better quality cab/build than the PF115? Or is that kinda subjective? | The pf cab is cool & sturdy enough, the driver in it's fairly light weight, nice tone, but doesn't handle alotta pwr. (2 of em's pretty cool tho)
Many reports of the SVT115 hitting above it's rated power handling & being a very punchy beast.
Outta the 2 I'd only go for the pf if weight was the issue.
__________________
BONZA#32,Ampeg#34,EBMM#106,P-bass#581,Alleva-Coppolo, Rickenbacker Club #450, Bergantino#32, BIG cabs club#16, Black'n Maple #459
| 
12-21-2012, 04:42 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Power handling I'd rate the PF115he on a par with the SVT 115e, and the build quality is quite good although lighter, smaller, and a different kind of plywood. The speaker in the PF115he is a 450w thermal rated speaker, and I have two and they can take a really good pounding.
EDIT: I just edited some stuff out about thinking the 115e doesn't go as low as the PF115he, but on Ampeg's website, it says it goes lower. Have to admit I was going off a failed memory, then. It's been quite a good few years since I played a 115e, and I didn't think they went as low as Ampeg says, but they're pretty accurate with the specs, so maybe my memory has failed me.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
Last edited by JimmyM : 12-21-2012 at 04:51 PM.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |