Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
AMPEG Portaflex 550 HEAD with PF210 cab

Sign in to disble this ad
`The above should say Portaflex 500 head`

I have searched for the answer to this but there are 1000s of posts on the PF350/500

My question is simply this;

The Ampeg PF500 head is rated at 500 watts RMS at 4 ohms but the PF210 matching cab is rated at 450 watts RMS at 8 ohms, does this mean that the head will not put out the 500 watts when used with this cab so I would need two 8 ohm cabs to get the full power ?
__________________
Fender Precision Deluxe 2010
Barefaced Super Twelve T and Ampeg PF500 (club member 243)
  #2  
Old 12-28-2011, 02:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hungary
Yes, and yes. The amp is ~300W @ 8 ohms, this means for full power just add another 8 ohm cab.
  #3  
Old 12-28-2011, 07:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
So Ampeg play the portability card on this amp/cab (Portaflex !) which is fine if you dont want the PF500 heads full power, but if you want the full beans you have to buy another cab which doubles the amount of gear, they should make a choice of 4 or 8 ohm PF115/210 cabs (as other companies do) then they could claim a one box solution to portability issues when using half or full power .
__________________
Fender Precision Deluxe 2010
Barefaced Super Twelve T and Ampeg PF500 (club member 243)
  #4  
Old 12-28-2011, 07:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: (M)a$$hole.
Personally, I find the volume difference negligible in anything but the most extreme settings, as the sensitivity of the cab is where it needs to be, and I applaud the expandability of the series for it.

as always, you have other options if you don't find these favorable.
__________________
Don't tell me the sky is the limit, when there are footprints on the Moon.
  #5  
Old 12-28-2011, 07:18 AM
Slowgypsy's Avatar
Signed, Sealed, Delivered
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY & MA
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRAHAM SG1 View Post
So Ampeg play the portability card on this amp/cab (Portaflex !) which is fine if you dont want the PF500 heads full power, but if you want the full beans you have to buy another cab which doubles the amount of gear, they should make a choice of 4 or 8 ohm PF115/210 cabs (as other companies do) then they could claim a one box solution to portability issues when using half or full power .
NFN... but... it really doesn't matter one iota whether the cab was rated for 450 watts, 500 watts or 550 watts. If you're thinking one is going to be louder than the other... forget it... they'll all sound the same in the real world.
__________________
Where words fail, music speaks.
www.thepeachys.com
  #6  
Old 12-28-2011, 07:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRAHAM SG1 View Post
does this mean that the head will not put out the 500 watts when used with this cab so I would need two 8 ohm cabs to get the full power ?
Short answer: Yes, you need another 8-ohm cab, and *then* dime the volume and EQ knobs to get the full power
__________________
G&L Tribute L-2500 Carved Top > Genz-Benz Shuttle 6.0 > Genz-Benz 410-T XB3
  #7  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
I'm curious as to whether a 2x10 & 1x15 is the way to go or 2 1x15s?
  #8  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:39 AM
stiles72's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albany IL
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRAHAM SG1 View Post
So Ampeg play the portability card on this amp/cab (Portaflex !) which is fine if you dont want the PF500 heads full power, but if you want the full beans you have to buy another cab which doubles the amount of gear, they should make a choice of 4 or 8 ohm PF115/210 cabs (as other companies do) then they could claim a one box solution to portability issues when using half or full power .

But simply running one 4 ohm 15" cab at 500 watts isn't going to sound that much louder than an 8 ohm at 350 watts or whatever the math works out as. Adding multiple drivers (quantity [2] 15" drivers) will increase your volume. Either way - the PF500 into the PF115 has more than enough balls so you shouldn't have anything to worry about- and it does give you the flexibility to expand in the future if you want to add another cab. If you only had a 4 ohm single 15", there is no way to add another cab to increase your volume since the PF500 has a 4 ohm minimum load.
__________________
I play bass - not treble!
------------------------
Official Ampeg Portaflex Club Member #76
Official Ampeg Club Member #511
Thunderbird Club Member #11
  #9  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:41 AM
wonderjosh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Latanza Heist View Post
I'm curious as to whether a 2x10 & 1x15 is the way to go or 2 1x15s?
Stop spamming every Portaflex thread on the board dooood!

Get another 115.
  #10  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
sorry lol... i just wanna reason to know what the 210 offers that is diff to the 115..? thanks
__________________
http://soundcloud.com/latanzaheist/sets/demo Fender Jazz Bass#871 Stingray #369

Last edited by Latanza Heist : 12-28-2011 at 10:44 AM. Reason: error
  #11  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
IME 350 watts is not enough in my band, I had a GKMB210 which did not cut it, I added an extra cab to that which gave great volume but too boomy ultimately, I am happy with my current rig (TC BH500 with 2xBC212s) but for rehearsals I just want a single cab/head solution, I had hoped a 4 ohm cab would give the amps full rating which would be enough but have never tried different cabs, I could take a single BC212 with my head but they are 8 ohms and only 250 watts so not enough guts .
I have just read about the Barefaced Super Twelve, now that looks good !
__________________
Fender Precision Deluxe 2010
Barefaced Super Twelve T and Ampeg PF500 (club member 243)
  #12  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago (South Suburbs), IL
Supporting Member
As others have stated, you wouldn't be able to "hear" the difference between 350W and 500W. You would certainly be able to tell the difference between one speaker and two speakers though. Also, keep in mind that an identical (if that was possible) 4 ohm and 8 ohm speaker would appear to reproduce at the same levels. A 4 ohm 15" wouldn't be able to reproduce the full "500 Watts".

Don't get hung up on "watts" as a measure of loudness.
__________________
G&L L2k and ASAT / Fender Jazz / Epiphone Jack Casady & Zenith / Kubicki X-Factor
Ampeg SVT-7-PRO --> PF15HE x2

Last edited by sevenorchids : 12-28-2011 at 04:00 PM.
  #13  
Old 12-28-2011, 03:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
well

I think a better question is what cab is a better 210, the PF-210 or the SVT-210 which pairs with the VR head. I like the SVT cab but have yet to hear the PF cab. The SVT210 stacks vertically quite well (when pairing) and the sound is pure classic rock!

Yeah I would get hung up on the watts either. Very few 210’s can bear the brunt of a full 500 watts and if they do, they’re pricey!
  #14  
Old 12-28-2011, 10:47 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRAHAM SG1 View Post
IME 350 watts is not enough in my band, I had a GKMB210 which did not cut it, I added an extra cab to that which gave great volume but too boomy ultimately, I am happy with my current rig (TC BH500 with 2xBC212s) but for rehearsals I just want a single cab/head solution, I had hoped a 4 ohm cab would give the amps full rating which would be enough but have never tried different cabs, I could take a single BC212 with my head but they are 8 ohms and only 250 watts so not enough guts .
You are way too hung up on numbers. Here's a couple universal truths:

1. The volume difference between 300 and 500w is negligible and manifests itself as headroom.

2. The volume difference between one cab and two cabs is quite significant, and it's by far the best way to create more volume, even if you don't add wattage. Yes, you will get a bump of low end (which you referred to as "too boomy"), but that's what tone knobs are for.

3. Power handling ratings on cabs are almost always based on what the voice coil burns out at, not on what the cab takes in real life, which is often significantly lower.

4. Having common sense will prevent you from blowing out a cab with a head that has more wattage than the cab can handle. Rule of thumb: If it sounds like it's going to explode, it likely will explode.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.