Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-29-2010, 07:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Ampeg SVT-7 and Shuttle 9.0 each Class D Why such a weight difference?

Sign in to disble this ad
The Genz Benz Shuttle 9.0 is Class D and close to the same power as the Ampeg SVT-7Pro which also is class D.

Genz Shuttle 9.0 is 500w-900w and 4 lbs.
Ampeg svt-7pro is 600w-1000w and 15.5 lbs.

Why such a weight difference?
Ampeg uses a much bigger box. Not sure why.
Genz gets it done with a much smaller box even though the features are not that different.
Ampeg has a compressor but Genz has a parametric mid-EQ.
Genz has 3 pre sets to Ampegs 2. But Ampeg has a mid selector.......etc. I see nothing to account for extra 11.5 lbs.

So what is it that makes the SVT-7pro to be 15.5lbs. ClassD ??
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 07:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Doesn't the 'peg use an output tranny? That would certainly make up the difference.
__________________
edit signature
  #3  
Old 05-29-2010, 12:25 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
not an output tranny, but a transformer based line out.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #4  
Old 05-29-2010, 12:33 PM
Registered User

pedal / amps - MAMMOTHsound
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: sheffield, uk
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM View Post
not an output tranny, but a transformer based line out.
transformer for that will weigh barely anything, but i guess the bigger box transformer balanced di etc will all add up.

I don't think ampegs strength is in their ability to make light weight amps
__________________
riffriff.
  #5  
Old 05-29-2010, 12:41 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
the last hybrid i owned weighed 30 lbs. yes, there are smaller out there, but there's also plenty bigger.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #6  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:34 PM
Jarrett's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Supporting Member
I think the GB is a little overrated at 900w @ 4ohms, imo. Maybe the Ampeg is quite a bit louder. Anyone A/B'ed them?
  #7  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:48 PM
BassmanPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarrett View Post
I think the GB is a little overrated at 900w @ 4ohms, imo. Maybe the Ampeg is quite a bit louder. Anyone A/B'ed them?
I get the impression, from the quality of the GB guys who post on here, that GB is one of the few whose output specs are accurate.

Paul
  #8  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:00 PM
Jarrett's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by BassmanPaul View Post
I get the impression, from the quality of the GB guys who post on here, that GB is one of the few whose output specs are accurate.
I got the impression from having two Shuttle 9.0s in my house and A/Bing them with a 350 watt Trace Elliot head. That said I dig my Shuttle 9.0 and use it quite a bit. Cool product, great customer service, but overrated wattage, imo.
  #9  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:24 PM
Development Engineer: Genz Benz
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
To clarify for accuracy, the Shuttle 9.0 exceeds 900 watts RMS at 4 ohms.
__________________
Engineer: Genz Benz
  #10  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:46 PM
BassmanPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarrett View Post
I got the impression from having two Shuttle 9.0s in my house and A/Bing them with a 350 watt Trace Elliot head. That said I dig my Shuttle 9.0 and use it quite a bit. Cool product, great customer service, but overrated wattage, imo.
I think you are comparing gain structures here and not wattages. The difference in volume between 350W and 500W, say, is quite small. To get twice as loud you have to increase power by ten times.

Paul
  #11  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:53 PM
vin*tone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ballaarat, Victoria, OZ
Send a message via MSN to vin*tone
Supporting Member
My guess is that it has a toroidal power transformer like the AG500 where the GB is SMPT.
  #12  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:17 PM
Jarrett's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by BassmanPaul View Post
I think you are comparing gain structures here and not wattages.
Actually I was comparing amps and how loud they were in my house. Specifically a 350 watt amp to a pair of (exceeding) 900 watt amps. Either my 350 watt amp is secretly a 1000 watt amp or... well you get the picture

Last edited by Jarrett : 05-29-2010 at 04:20 PM.
  #13  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarrett View Post
Actually I was comparing amps and how loud they were in my house. Specifically a 350 watt amp to a pair of (exceeding) 900 watt amps. Either my 350 watt amp is secretly a 1000 watt amp or... well you get the picture
This would also be a big factor- what speaker cabs were the amps running through?, and, was it the same speaker cab?
__________________
edit signature
  #14  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:23 PM
Jarrett's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickenBoogie View Post
This would also be a big factor- what speaker cabs were the amps running through?, and, was it the same speaker cab?
Of course. It wouldn't mean anything if I was not A/Bing with the same bass, cab, etc.
  #15  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:23 PM
Development Engineer: Genz Benz
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Could also be voicing that makes one head appear louder than another, and the "louder" voicing appealed to you more.
__________________
Engineer: Genz Benz
  #16  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:52 PM
rpsands's Avatar
Less Ebay, more Mel Bay
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Supporting Member
How did you gain match them? That's the culprit 99 times out of a hundred. Someone sets Amp A to 12 o'clock and compares to Amp B at 12 o'clock.

The volume taper can also be quite different.

The Genz amps are not "redlined" when you first see the limiter go off, either, IIRC.
__________________
Dingwall ABZ 5
Lots of pedals
Markbass SD1200 -> fEarful 1515/66 (or TC115N)
Red Complex
  #17  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:56 PM
Jarrett's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waxahachie, Tx
Supporting Member
rpsands, if you are giving me advice to help me, I appreciate it. I've been through all of that already with my Shuttle 9.0 and another one I A/B'ed it with. They just aren't as loud as I thought they would be. Like I said, great amp, great customer service, NOT loud enough to be what I consider a 900 watt amp in my book. It's one guy's opinion, ymmv. This thread has been derailed enough I think.
  #18  
Old 05-29-2010, 08:53 PM
B String's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Supporting Member
One thing I've found on the 9.0, is the amp gets markedly
louder when you boost the tone knobs. This is not unusual
with amps, it just seems like the 9.0 is more sensitive to tone
boost than most amps I've used.

I've found it interesting that when I've reached the limit of my
9.0's volume and "oomph", I haven't lost headroom. I can
pound on the amp but the sound never gets squashed like the
Markbass heads I've used. (and loved) Maybe that's what we
get for the higher wattage rating. Not more volume, but
cleaner volume. ......That's all I got.
  #19  
Old 05-29-2010, 11:09 PM
Development Engineer: Genz Benz
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by B String View Post
One thing I've found on the 9.0, is the amp gets markedly
louder when you boost the tone knobs. This is not unusual
with amps, it just seems like the 9.0 is more sensitive to tone
boost than most amps I've used.

I've found it interesting that when I've reached the limit of my
9.0's volume and "oomph", I haven't lost headroom. I can
pound on the amp but the sound never gets squashed like the
Markbass heads I've used. (and loved) Maybe that's what we
get for the higher wattage rating. Not more volume, but
cleaner volume. ......That's all I got.
This goes back to my comment on voicing,, plus you are also experiencing different design approaches regarding dynamcs management. Each manufacturer has their own philosophy regarding design choices and approaches, there is no right or wrong here.

If all amps sounded or played the same, wouldn't things be boring?
__________________
Engineer: Genz Benz
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:09 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.