|  | 
07-10-2010, 12:18 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New Hampshire, USA | | | Aux cab? Wisdom of the list--
Sign in to disble this ad
OK, GAS is taking over.
I play through an older Fender M-80 Bass combo (15" speaker), and when necessary, add a Fender cab with another 15" speaker I picked up for short money. The combo sounds fine, for what we do, and when I add the cab, both sound fine and can get pretty loud.
The problem? I'm thinking of getting a 4X10 to use in place of the cab I have now. Why? To expand the tonal range of my sound. I'm growing as a player, and would like to explore more in the way of how I get out there. We play some classic rock and originals. I use FX from time to time, and a SansAmp Bass Driver DI.
To the expertise and opinions of the folks here: which cab would you recommend, and why? Price will be a factor, so please consider that as well.
TIA!
__________________
Jeff Brown - Mediocre Bassist Club #402, Fender Jazz Bass Club #772, NH Bassists #16
| 
07-10-2010, 01:03 PM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | it's a bit of a wives tale that the 410 will expand the tonal range of your sound. with modern speaker building and cab porting methods, 410's and 115's can have pretty much the same tonal range. i'd leave your stack as is. if you're looking for more high end, you could add a tweeter and crossover, but honestly, i think most tweeters sound extremely cheesy and bring nothing to the table.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
07-10-2010, 01:10 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Boston, MA | | hogwash I say
the 4x10 will have alot more motor strength relative to speaker area, and therefore sound 'quicker' etc | 
07-10-2010, 01:15 PM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrashMaster hogwash I say
the 4x10 will have alot more motor strength relative to speaker area, and therefore sound 'quicker' etc | obviously a 410 will sound louder than a 115. nobody will debate that unless they're looney. but how will it have more "motor strength"? most magnets on 10"s are smaller than magnets on 15"s.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
07-10-2010, 01:17 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Boston, MA | | | true, but overall they usually -certainly not always- have bigger magnets relative to surface area of the driver. | 
07-10-2010, 01:46 PM
|  | Registered Bass Offender | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Cambria, CA (Central Coast) | | | Hogwash, I say.
Nobody measures "motor strength" or "magnet-to-cone-area ratio."
As for "speed" of the cones, that's bogus. You'll hear a different tone than a 15, but there's no speed difference. It's due to the tone difference.
__________________
Larger avatar photo here.
My usual stock answers: No, Tuesday, 12
| 
07-10-2010, 03:03 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Boston, MA | | | that tone difference is due to physical differences in the drivers / cabinets...
If were talking about cabs with 'full range' drivers, on the whole the 4x10 will have more surface area and more total motor force....that will usually mean better low end, better transient response, more output, and being tens, usually better highs to boot.
Regardless, he asked for suggestions not a debate about 15s versus 10s.
What can you spend on this hypothetical new cab? | 
07-10-2010, 04:24 PM
| | Registered User Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: New Hampshire | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrashMaster true, but overall they usually -certainly not always- have bigger magnets relative to surface area of the driver. | That they may, but it's a moot point, giving little to no benefit. As for better highs, the opposite is generally the case. Whatever additional high frequency range a single ten has on-axis compared to a single fifteen is squandered when the drivers are placed side by side, while in the midrange off-axis dispersion of a 4x10 is considerably less than that of a 1x15. The 4x10 may be a very popular configuration, but it's still the poster child of how not to build a speaker. | 
07-10-2010, 04:24 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dallas, TX | | | Reguardless of this little debate, the fact is, what you have now is a good match. Putting a 410 and a 15 together is one of the worst pairings, no matter how popular it may be. 2 15's, good- 115 + 410, the 15 is lost in the mix.
__________________
edit signature
| 
07-10-2010, 05:45 PM
|  | passionate hack | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec | | | IMO you'd be better off with an upgrade in quality than a change in driver configuration.
Without budget and a guesstimate of how loud you wanna be it's a crapshoot.
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P
Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
| 
07-10-2010, 07:21 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New Hampshire, USA | | | Thanks for the input so far - and I sure didn't want to have this devolve into differing philosophies vis a vis 115s vs 4X10s!
Please keep in mind my M-80 is not a "modern" combo. Its 1980s vintage. The 15" speaker does what it does; that said, I wonder what a 410, or maybe even a 210 would do for my "range."
RickenBoogie, how would the 15 get lost? I'm no physicist/acoustic expert. And Iomo, let's say I have $1kUSD. Or, only $500USD? I've thought about a new amp/combo/whatever, but what I've got now isn't broken, so I'm somewhat adverse to "fixin' " it, and as I said, money IS a consideration.
I need to be loud enough to fill an indoor venue (think gymnasiums, clubs, etc.) or smaller outdoor venues. No concert halls or stadiums yet!
__________________
Jeff Brown - Mediocre Bassist Club #402, Fender Jazz Bass Club #772, NH Bassists #16
| 
07-11-2010, 07:52 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dallas, TX | | | The 15 gets lost. because it's one speaker against 4. The 410 is loud, much louder than the 15, so the 410 is rocking along, while the 15 is choking. Simple. A 15 and a 210 are comparable, and not a bad match, (sometimes). I use a rig with that combo of spkrs, (Mesa Deisels)- but a 410 and 15 is nothing but marketing.
__________________
edit signature
| 
07-11-2010, 08:38 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: valparaiso, in. | | | My Orange OBC115 is every bit as loud as any 410 I've ever heard. When I add a cab it's a 212 cab, and it produces a great overall sound. Unless one of the cabs is much more efficient than the other, the sound levels are very close to equal. | 
07-11-2010, 09:42 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New Hampshire, USA | | | OK, so maybe I should be thinking about a 210 or 212? Will I still get the volume of my combo + cab, i.e., 2 15s?
__________________
Jeff Brown - Mediocre Bassist Club #402, Fender Jazz Bass Club #772, NH Bassists #16
| 
07-12-2010, 01:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kenosha Wi. | | | I like the 2-12" driver cabs for overall output. If thats what you are looking for. | 
07-12-2010, 04:46 AM
|  | passionate hack | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec | | | With a budget of 1K I'd get a fEarful type 15/6 and spend around 750 of it (I have one made by LDS). Then I'd build on the 250 (by selling the combo?) until I had enough for an alternate head with around 500 watts at 8 Ohms, since these cabs are 8 Ohms and can handle/enjoy a lot of juice (you can score a new Shuttle 9 on ebay for around 700 if you watch). The result will weigh about 50 lbs (including the head) and go lower, louder, clearer than the combo. Just my .o2 Good luck in your tonal quest!
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P
Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
| 
07-12-2010, 05:06 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto, Canada | | | As you are only getting 160 watts....if that, I would keep what you have for now and look into something more powerful overall asap.
__________________
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated"
Mahatma Ghandi (1869-1948)
| 
07-12-2010, 05:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA | | | A 4x10 has much greater speaker surface area than a 1x15. Thus, unless the 1x15 has great efficiency and the 4x10 is really inefficient, it will almost always be louder.
A 2x10's speaker area is more similar to a 1x15's
Keep your current setup if it sounds good, or get an entirely new one.
__________________
Anime-ted Bass Players Group member #5. Mediocre Bassist Club member #316. 15" Club member #8. Metal Bassist Club Member #27
| 
07-13-2010, 05:12 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New Hampshire, USA | | | Thanks, all, for very useful and informative info. For now, I'll keep my rig as is. If I can, I may try my combo with a 212 or 210 just to see what it sounds like. As budget allows, I'm going to look for a used larger, more powerful rig.
__________________
Jeff Brown - Mediocre Bassist Club #402, Fender Jazz Bass Club #772, NH Bassists #16
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |