Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickinator The search has been narrowed. The Brx is an 18" deep cab and the Avatars are 16.5" deep. Is there a benefit to having all 4 speakers in one cab than dividing them into two cabs.
Portability isn't a factor for me.
|
Ampeg's SVT 810 cabinet is 16" deep...Bergantino's 410 cabs are 15.5" deep, Berg's 210 cabs are 12.5" deep, their NV series are 15" deep. Sunn cabs were 15" deep, ect., ect.
Depth may or maynot help in what tuning the manufacturer is trying to achieve.
Myself, I always found a cabinet that is 18+ inches in depth hard and bulky to transport. And, putting a 18+ inch deep 410 cab in some passenger car back seats can be a real challenge!
I'll have to research Carvin's change to Celestion bass drivers, I wasn't aware of their change.
Carvin was using Eminence's (of China?) inexpensive, standard x-max, stamped steel framed drivers, crems and neos and Foster/Fostex/P-Audio horns.
I believe their crossovers are from Eminence.
Avatar is using Eminence USA's top of the line 2510 cast frame, neo driver with a custom x-max to match their cabinets tuning and dimensions.
Avatar's horns are also from Foster and their crossovers are from Eminence.
"To my ears," I've not had any problem of loss of uppermid response from my two 210 neo Avatar cabinets that I stack as a vertical 410.
Stacking two 210's in the vertical will give you better mids dispersion, better projection, and fewer phase issues than the standard configured 410 cabinet.
It also gives the hearing advantage of a bigger/taller cabinet by getting the top driver up nearer to your ears.
And as mentioned, you can run one cabinet for rehearsals/small gigs, both cabinets when more coverage and volume is needed.