Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-13-2010, 03:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Bassman amp identification help

Sign in to disble this ad
Okay folks, I've got an old Fender Bassman Head that needs some IDing. I have a sneaking suspicion that the tubes are blown and I want to know if it will be worth getting them replaced or not.

Serial number is A 40953. By using this page http://www.ggjaguar.com/fendamp5.htm I'm guessing that its a 67 or 68.

I have no cab to plug this thing into right now.

First, I want to know what year it is and if it will be worth keeping or selling to someone who really wants it. Opinions are appreciated!

Second, how do these things sound plugged up and running. All I can find clips of on YouTube are people playing these with guitars. Feels sorta blasphemous to me

Third, how much would replacing the tubes in this badboy run me on average? A local tech said it would cost at least 75 for the guy just to look at it.

Here are some pics to help with the ID. Sorry about the quality.







__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricssonB View Post
Mud is only good for Vaynes and Honey.
  #2  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:03 PM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
http://www.ampwares.com/
  #3  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by billfitzmaurice View Post
Yeah I saw this site, that's kind of a wide range of years though. I'd like to narrow it down. Thanks for the referral!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricssonB View Post
Mud is only good for Vaynes and Honey.
  #4  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boulder Suburbia, Colorado
Well, it's older than mine and mine's an '81

Quote:
Third, how much would replacing the tubes in this badboy run me on average? A local tech said it would cost at least 75 for the guy just to look at it.
I'd find another tech. My tech re-capped and re-tubed for $175, total.
__________________
Straighten the Crooked
  #5  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachoff View Post
Well, it's older than mine and mine's an '81



I'd find another tech. My tech re-capped and re-tubed for $175, total.
Yeah I'd really like to find a cheaper tech. Do you know how I can tell if these tubes are blown for sure without a cab to plug it in to?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricssonB View Post
Mud is only good for Vaynes and Honey.
  #6  
Old 08-13-2010, 05:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver B.C.
I think you're right about the year. it was the only year that had drip edge. the grill clothe has been changed though.
__________________
Yorkville/Traynor Club Member #187 / Official Ampeg Club #731 / Kramer Club #45
  #7  
Old 08-13-2010, 06:05 PM
johnk_10's Avatar
vintage bass nut

John K Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Supporting Member
'67's and some '68's had the drip edge, but only the '67's had the vertical black pinstripe between the input jacks and the V & T controls and around the turquoise 'bassman amp' printing, making your's an AB165 circuit built in '67.
  #8  
Old 08-13-2010, 06:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
67 through 70 had the aluminum trim. The earliest ones -- 67 and 68 -- had the black vertical lines on the faceplate, so you're right that this one is a 67 or 68.

You might be able to zero in on the year with the pot codes:

http://home.provide.net/~cfh/pots.html

But apparently Fender bought a huge pile of CTS pots in 1966 which turn up in amps as late the early 70s. So if you check the codes and they're 1966, that's obviously not right. Any other year and they're probably telling you the truth, especially if several are the same year.
  #9  
Old 08-13-2010, 06:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mississippi Coast
I would have sworn they were labeling them with CBS by then, but I guess I'm wrong.
__________________
ERIC WATKINS
  #10  
Old 08-13-2010, 07:11 PM
lowphatbass's Avatar
****
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: west coast
Supporting Member
You won't find very many sound clips of bassists using them because they're a bit underpowered (especially by today's standards), they are mainly used as guitar amps and have been for quite some time. If your disappointed by this, I wouldn't be because it makes it a pretty valuable amp.
If your not sure what your doing you should really do your homework and find the best amp tech in your area. The amp just have a bad tube or could need a lot of work. Because the amp is somewhat valuable a dishonest repair person could remove perfectly good parts from your amp(to resell or use later)and charge you for replacements. Always ask for all your old parts back, it also helps when you go to resell the amp. Either way you need to get the amp fixed if your going to sell it, old tube amps that "need work" don't sell for very much because people assume that if it only needs minor repair or adjustment the seller would have it done and sell the amp for much more.
__________________
It is through creating, not possessing, that live is revealed.
RIP Jimmy
  #11  
Old 08-13-2010, 07:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Markham, Ontario
Supporting Member
1. Definitely a 67 or 68.

2. They sound warm and are surprisingly loud for 50 watts. I had really good success running mine through a Bergantino HS210, and also through a Bergantino HT115. The Bassman even had a decent slap sound though there was definitely a bit of "pillow" to it. This will likely not be an amp that would cut it for gigs for most people, but was awesome for jazz trio work for me.

3. A decent set of tubes will cost you about $100 - $125. I re-tubed mine with Tung-Sol 12ax7 tubes, and TAD 6L6 GC tubes. I got them from thetubestore.com - very helpful folks when it came to choosing the right tubes for the job.
  #12  
Old 08-13-2010, 07:31 PM
johnk_10's Avatar
vintage bass nut

John K Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tusec View Post
67 through 70 had the aluminum trim. The earliest ones -- 67 and 68 -- had the black vertical lines on the faceplate, so you're right that this one is a 67 or 68.
i've never seen a '69 or a '70 with aluminum trim and i've seen/owned zillions of '69's and 70's. and the only ones with the black pinstripe that i've seen/owned were all '67's (never saw a '68 with them).
  #13  
Old 08-13-2010, 07:42 PM
lowphatbass's Avatar
****
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: west coast
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ski3223 View Post

I have no cab to plug this thing into right now.
Oh yea, incase your not aware it may not be good for the amp to have it powered-on for any significant time without plugging it into a cab. You're aware of this but I thought I would throw it out there, just incase.
__________________
It is through creating, not possessing, that live is revealed.
RIP Jimmy
  #14  
Old 08-13-2010, 07:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnk_10 View Post
i've never seen a '69 or a '70 with aluminum trim and i've seen/owned zillions of '69's and 70's. and the only ones with the black pinstripe that i've seen/owned were all '67's (never saw a '68 with them).
You might be right. I'm going on memory from my hardcore amp junkie days a decade or so ago, and now that I think about it what you're saying sounds correct. On the other hand, I googled it and several 69s came up with aluminum trim (but no 70s). Don't know if they were dated correctly though. I'm pretty sure there are 68s with the black lines, but I'm not sure why I'm pretty sure of that.
  #15  
Old 08-13-2010, 08:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowphatbass View Post
Oh yea, incase your not aware it may not be good for the amp to have it powered-on for any significant time without plugging it into a cab. You're aware of this but I thought I would throw it out there, just incase.
Yeah I found that out the hard way a long time ago. Long story short I got electrocuted pretty viciously! Quite an interesting feeling. Thanks for the info though, I wish I would have known that THEN lol.

Great info from all! So the general consensus seems to be get this thing fixed up? Seems like the price will be pretty manageable if I find the right tech. Lowphatbass, I definitely won't be doing the work myself. I am not nearly knowledgeable enough to even attempt the work on it.

Depending on how much I like the sound when its all fixed up I might be selling it when I'm done. What would be a reasonable going price for this? The research I've scrounged up so far seems to be anywhere from 500-900.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricssonB View Post
Mud is only good for Vaynes and Honey.
  #16  
Old 08-13-2010, 08:14 PM
johnk_10's Avatar
vintage bass nut

John K Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Supporting Member
i would say it's worth $400-$500 running perfectly. i sold a mint blackface '66 head for $699, but that's before the economy and the market on them tanked (4 years ago).
  #17  
Old 08-13-2010, 08:18 PM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbwdog View Post
I would have sworn they were labeling them with CBS by then, but I guess I'm wrong.
That varied from model to model. As I recall pre-CBS were labeled as from Fullerton CA.
  #18  
Old 08-13-2010, 09:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Olney, Maryland
Very easy to check..
Transformer codes; both power, output and choke will have 606-XXX the XXX= year and week of manufacture,
Never go by cosmetics they are easily changed especially things like the trim around the grill cloth, and even face/ back plates.

No offence but the Bassman makes a great guitar amp, not so great with bass, unless you like early break up and grind. The best “bass” amp Fender made for many years was the Showman which is a guitar amp LOL

MM
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.