Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Building a cab; 12/6 vs 2x12 vs 2x10??

Sign in to disble this ad
I have some good bass cabs so far, but they are pretty massive, so I am looking for a nice small cab that can be used for small gigs, and not need a truck to load them in.

I have a good cabinet maker who makes cabs for me, and while he has some bass knowledge, he mostly makes guitar cabs, so in regards to using WinISO and calculating all that junk, hes not the best at it, so some help would be nice.

First off, like I said im looking at smaller cabs, so what I was deciding between is the 12/6/1 fearful type, or a 2x12 with a tweeter (or 2x10 with tweeter).. Im looking for a hi-fi type tone, but still loud enough to do small-medium gigs on its own (and maybe larger when mic'd)

The 12/6/1 would be the most compact in size, yet im afraid it wont be as loud as a 2x10 or 2x12 would be.

Im looking to use an Eminence Deltalite or Kappalite 12 btw.

So far, my dimensions from just guess work so far, would be around 24W 13H 12D.. does that sound like it'd be ok? Ideally, id rather have a shallower depth, and larger H/W, rather than a huge depth of like 18+.. Thats one of the reasons my current cab cant fit in my car, is the 17D along with the height/W.

any help?
__________________
my new blog (in progress) snownote.com
  #2  
Old 02-04-2011, 07:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Davenport Iowa
Supporting Member
If you have 500 watts or so the 12/6/1 would be the cabinet you'd want . Greenboy has the plans on his fEarful wiki so you could just have your carpenter buddy make one for you . With that high output 12 " and that mid and enough power it will easily get as loud as a good 210 and go deeper and clearer . And it would be enough for quite a few gigs too . You pretty much need an amp that will put out 500 watts at 8 ohms to take full advantage of it capability though .
__________________
Soundgear club #98

Yamaha BB425 / SR1405
SVP-CL / fEarful 15/6 and 15 sub
  #3  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Yea, the 12/6/1 is ideal, due to the size being slightly smaller.. So you are positive it can push out more than a 210 or 212?? Its just odd, I understand how it would sound better overall/more hi-fi, which is what I want, but im kinda confused how it would be as loud as a good 210 or 212..

Also, so I understand abit more.. the whole "fEarful" word is based off this 12/6/1 combination right? so when you hear that word, thats what it means essentially?? What 6.5" driver is usually used for them?
__________________
my new blog (in progress) snownote.com
  #4  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winnipeg,Siberia
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCormier View Post
I have some good bass cabs so far, but they are pretty massive, so I am looking for a nice small cab that can be used for small gigs, and not need a truck to load them in.

I have a good cabinet maker who makes cabs for me, and while he has some bass knowledge, he mostly makes guitar cabs, so in regards to using WinISO and calculating all that junk, hes not the best at it, so some help would be nice.

First off, like I said im looking at smaller cabs, so what I was deciding between is the 12/6/1 fearful type, or a 2x12 with a tweeter (or 2x10 with tweeter).. Im looking for a hi-fi type tone, but still loud enough to do small-medium gigs on its own (and maybe larger when mic'd)

The 12/6/1 would be the most compact in size, yet im afraid it wont be as loud as a 2x10 or 2x12 would be.

Im looking to use an Eminence Deltalite or Kappalite 12 btw.

So far, my dimensions from just guess work so far, would be around 24W 13H 12D.. does that sound like it'd be ok? Ideally, id rather have a shallower depth, and larger H/W, rather than a huge depth of like 18+.. Thats one of the reasons my current cab cant fit in my car, is the 17D along with the height/W.

any help?
if you gotta pay a guy to make them you will be just as well to order one from a custom builder....they have done the math,and have the jigs to cut down on construction costs.....there are several guys on here that would be worth talking to
__________________
need ain't got nuthin to do with it
lust is a perfectly good reason to buy gear
  #5  
Old 02-04-2011, 07:02 PM
Philonius's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 2k W of the Duwamsh
Supporting Member
You might also look around at the Bill Fitzmaurice site,http://billfitzmaurice.net/ , particularly the Jack cabinets. I bought a fEarful 12/6 from someone on this board, and quickly decided it was more of a pain to move around than I was interested in. (Wanna buy mine?)

I am just starting in building 2 BFM Jack 10s, and from what I've been lead to believe they have a very hi fidelity sound, especially when built with the peizo tweeter array. I couldn't quantify how they would compare with a fEarful, but they are said to have very even output, and be highly efficient.

What I really like about this approach is the scalability; two 16 x 16 x 20 boxes that weigh under 30# each. That means one easy load for smaller shows or two reasonable loads for a rig that will compete with a good 4x10.

Choose either and you won't go far wrong as far as I can tell.
__________________
Legion of Mothman #12 ov 25
Wick Club Member #318
Phil Jones Bass Club #12

Last edited by Philonius : 02-04-2011 at 07:06 PM. Reason: fix url link
  #6  
Old 02-04-2011, 08:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
the thing about buying from another builder, is it usually costs 3 to 4 times more than this builder im using.

I will mention, this builder IS a professional guitar cabinet builder; so he makes cabs for a living. The thing obviously, is he deals mostly guitar cabs. But he does have a decent knowledge of bass cab designs, just not to the level of certain bass cab fanatics here. The last cab he made for me though, was the exact dimensions of a Genz Benz Neo 2x12, and it sounds great. Its just huge, its about the size of a normal 4x10, so I'd like something smaller.

Hes also in Canada, and shipping is under $50, even for a 40 lbs cab.. while ordering a cab from a builder in the states would be over $150 most likely.
__________________
my new blog (in progress) snownote.com
  #7  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Davenport Iowa
Supporting Member
The 12/6/1 will be as loud as most 210 cabs but won't match a 212 cabinet for volume . For something that will do that Philonious has the right idea , a BFM Jack 210 or a pair of the 110s . It won't go as super deep as a fEarful but will get louder with less watts and still be portable .
__________________
Soundgear club #98

Yamaha BB425 / SR1405
SVP-CL / fEarful 15/6 and 15 sub
  #8  
Old 02-05-2011, 12:26 AM
DukeLeJeune's Avatar
only immortal for a limited time

Owner & speaker designer, AudioKinesis
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Preston, Idaho
GOLD Supporting Member
The size cabinet you describe is too small for most 12" woofer, let alone a 2x12, unless you want a really peaky upper bass with no low bass. However the Kappalite 3012LF would work, though your proposed cab is definitely on the small side. So I suggest an adaptation of the fEarful 12/6. Porting might be an issue, but probably not an insurmountable one.
__________________
Full review of Thunderchild 112AF in Issue #7 of Bass Gear Magazine
primeVibe seasons your instrument for richer tone
The Thunderchild 115 is out!
  #9  
Old 02-05-2011, 04:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philonius View Post
You might also look around at the Bill Fitzmaurice site,http://billfitzmaurice.net/ , particularly the Jack cabinets. I bought a fEarful 12/6 from someone on this board, and quickly decided it was more of a pain to move around than I was interested in. (Wanna buy mine?)

I am just starting in building 2 BFM Jack 10s, and from what I've been lead to believe they have a very hi fidelity sound, especially when built with the peizo tweeter array. I couldn't quantify how they would compare with a fEarful, but they are said to have very even output, and be highly efficient.

What I really like about this approach is the scalability; two 16 x 16 x 20 boxes that weigh under 30# each. That means one easy load for smaller shows or two reasonable loads for a rig that will compete with a good 4x10.

Choose either and you won't go far wrong as far as I can tell.
Are you sure the cab you bought is a fEARful? My 12/6 only weighs a little more than 35 lbs.
I'd rather pack and carry one 16x16x24, 40 lb box than two 15x16x20, 30 lb boxes.

Jack10s are good PA cabs, but they don't do it for me as bass guitar cabs. The size and efficiency seems to come at the expense of low end. YMMV, of course.

Although I haven't tried one, I'd think a BFM Omni (full range version, not OmniTop) would be better suited for bass guitar.
__________________
How can I be over the hill? I haven't reached the top yet!

Last edited by wcriley : 02-05-2011 at 09:34 AM.
  #10  
Old 02-05-2011, 08:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Croatia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philonius View Post
You might also look around at the Bill Fitzmaurice site,http://billfitzmaurice.net/ , particularly the Jack cabinets. I bought a fEarful 12/6 from someone on this board, and quickly decided it was more of a pain to move around than I was interested in. (Wanna buy mine?)

I am just starting in building 2 BFM Jack 10s, and from what I've been lead to believe they have a very hi fidelity sound, especially when built with the peizo tweeter array. I couldn't quantify how they would compare with a fEarful, but they are said to have very even output, and be highly efficient.

What I really like about this approach is the scalability; two 16 x 16 x 20 boxes that weigh under 30# each. That means one easy load for smaller shows or two reasonable loads for a rig that will compete with a good 4x10.

Choose either and you won't go far wrong as far as I can tell.
let us know when you finish it!
  #11  
Old 02-05-2011, 10:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denmark
I have build some of the BMF models. An Omni10.5, an OmniTop12 and a Titan39.
The Omni12 and Titan39 was build for use in a PA and especially the Omni12 is a really good value. Its very defined, even with a melded array. I would like to hear it with a CD horn.

The Omni10.5 was build to be a practice and small monitor cabinet for bass.
The high efficiency is acheaved on the cost of low end.
And although the cab sounds fantastic with my fretless Fender Jazz it gets anemic in the low end department with my 5-str. Sandberg.
I find the Omni 10.5 sound boxy due to the peak at 200 Hz. It's nothing that an EQ cant tame, but I dont have a graphic EQ in my bass stack, so its an issue for me.
The Jack also has a peak from 200+ Hz and a lack of low end. This might fill the need for some bass players, but if you want low end and hi-fi at the same time, I dont think a Jack is the way to go unless you plan to do some heavy EQ.

On the other hand, BMF is very lightweight and fEarful12.6 isn't.

Oh - those ever lasting dilemmas
  #12  
Old 02-05-2011, 11:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Croatia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordskov View Post
I have build some of the BMF models. An Omni10.5, an OmniTop12 and a Titan39.
The Omni12 and Titan39 was build for use in a PA and especially the Omni12 is a really good value. Its very defined, even with a melded array. I would like to hear it with a CD horn.

The Omni10.5 was build to be a practice and small monitor cabinet for bass.
The high efficiency is acheaved on the cost of low end.
And although the cab sounds fantastic with my fretless Fender Jazz it gets anemic in the low end department with my 5-str. Sandberg.
I find the Omni 10.5 sound boxy due to the peak at 200 Hz. It's nothing that an EQ cant tame, but I dont have a graphic EQ in my bass stack, so its an issue for me.
The Jack also has a peak from 200+ Hz and a lack of low end. This might fill the need for some bass players, but if you want low end and hi-fi at the same time, I dont think a Jack is the way to go unless you plan to do some heavy EQ.

On the other hand, BMF is very lightweight and fEarful12.6 isn't.

Oh - those ever lasting dilemmas
And what do you think about those omniīs if you forget about low b? A lot of folks claim the jack 10 to be the best sounding Billīs cab for bass guitar, i think i will go for two of them No offence, but anyone who finds fearful 12/6 heavy should be planning on visiting gym or doctor, if you are under fifty of course.
  #13  
Old 02-05-2011, 11:51 AM
Philonius's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 2k W of the Duwamsh
Supporting Member
56 and counting, just had back surgery, and thanks for your concern. I'm a spry old bugger, but more the endurance type than a heavy mover. And yes, I'll be hitting the gym soon with every intention of polishing up my fitness.

Agreed, the fEarful isn't that much to manage, but awkward enough that I wanted to down scale. Everyone has their own personal biases, and I wanted to have one small cab that would be super easy to carry and would be, for me, good'nuff. I'll sacrifice a bit of low end response as part of the bargain. With a pair, I don't expect to feel that I'm lacking any tone and will have more volume available than I'll ever, ever need. YMMV. I'm just throwing out the BFM as another option to consider.
__________________
Legion of Mothman #12 ov 25
Wick Club Member #318
Phil Jones Bass Club #12

Last edited by Philonius : 02-05-2011 at 11:52 AM. Reason: spelling matters
  #14  
Old 02-05-2011, 11:59 AM
rpsands's Avatar
Less Ebay, more Mel Bay
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Supporting Member
Buy a Thunderchild.
__________________
Dingwall ABZ 5
Lots of pedals
Markbass SD1200 -> fEarful 1515/66 (or TC115N)
Red Complex
  #15  
Old 02-05-2011, 12:08 PM
IntrepidCellist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manhattan
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpsands View Post
Buy a Thunderchild.
+1. Very manageable and car-friendly, and plenty loud with great dispersion.
  #16  
Old 02-05-2011, 02:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordskov View Post
...On the other hand, BMF is very lightweight and fEarful12.6 isn't...
How is 36 lbs NOT a lightweight bass cab?

I do agree with your assessment of the Jack10, though. It's not my cup of tea.

Has anyone tried a Jack15?
__________________
How can I be over the hill? I haven't reached the top yet!
  #17  
Old 02-05-2011, 03:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Croatia
Has anyone tried a Jack15?[/quote]

I want to know the same thing but i doubt it will be many of these around, its form factor could be a problem of fitting it in smaller cars but I may be wrong, of course.
  #18  
Old 02-05-2011, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
So.. with a 12 or 13" depth.. what should my other dimensions be for a 12/6/1 to fill out the volume for the box??
__________________
my new blog (in progress) snownote.com
  #19  
Old 02-05-2011, 09:38 PM
DukeLeJeune's Avatar
only immortal for a limited time

Owner & speaker designer, AudioKinesis
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Preston, Idaho
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickCormier View Post
So.. with a 12 or 13" depth.. what should my other dimensions be for a 12/6/1 to fill out the volume for the box??
My suggestion is to push the width of the cabinet out to the point where you have about 1.7 cubic feet net internal volume, after woofer, ports, midrange chamber, and bracing. This is still smaller that a fEarful, but reasonable for a compact cab.

For ports, I will depart from fEarful tradition and suggest a pair of 3" diameter Precision Ports, flared on both ends to delay the onset of chuffing, placed symmetrically around the woofer. I don't think you'll have room on the front of the box, so that leaves the sides and the rear panel. With a small box like this, you want the ports symmetrical so that the air load on the back of the cone is less likley to induce cone rocking (which can cause the voice coil to tap the edges of the magnetic gap; I got that in one of my compact prototypes).

Here is Precision Port's online port length calculator:

http://www.psp-inc.com/tools.html

I recommend port lengths based on a calculated tuning frequency of about 50 to 52 Hz; in this shape box, the actual tuning frequency will end up being about 2 Hz less. You will end up -3 dB in the lower 50's, with no upper bass bumpage. This is a real-world spec; no marketing department optimism.

Make sure the ports' inner flare will clear the woofer's basket, or else you'll have an embarassing problem at some point in your final assembly process.
__________________
Full review of Thunderchild 112AF in Issue #7 of Bass Gear Magazine
primeVibe seasons your instrument for richer tone
The Thunderchild 115 is out!

Last edited by DukeLeJeune : 02-05-2011 at 09:53 PM.
  #20  
Old 02-05-2011, 10:03 PM
m.oreilly's Avatar
in love w/a girl named velveta
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ukiah, CA
Supporting Member
thanks for that port calc link duke
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.