|  | 
01-07-2013, 09:06 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kent, UK | | | Clean/Dirty 8-10?? Hey low end lovers, (skip to last paragraph to avoid unnesecery talk)
Not often I start a thread due to being able to google all my talkbass needs, wants and fantasies. But I have an idea//question and seek opinions and facts.
Now I know a lot of you like splitting signals clean//dirty blends, bi-amps and even completely separate rigs, but what about cabs?
For example I play in a hard rock/grunge/metal band and enjoy using a few effects here and there. Bit of dirt, chorus, a lot of dirt, etc. But like to use these over a solid crisp clean to keep things from washing out. And now I'm rambling so to the point.
Has anyone split up a cab? Say two heads into a 8x10 or other multiple driver enclosure. I imagine it would work best on an 8-10/4-10/4-12 or like the boogie 4-10 1-15. Clean 10's dirty 15?
Thanks, Reene | 
01-07-2013, 09:18 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Grand Rapids Michigan | | | Unless your cab is already specifically set up to run stereo like some 810's are, imho its a waste of time and effort. Just run your whole signal through an 810.
Now if you have a set of smaller mis matched cabs then you may vary well want to run separate amps.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM Who the heck wants to "cut" through a mix anyway? I want to punch the mix in the balls. Anyone can cut through the mix. Not everyone can beat the mix's ass  | Greenboy-fEARful #53 "Bruce Banner" | 
01-07-2013, 09:24 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: White Plains | | | You can also make it simpler by running your effects through a blender pedal. It allows you to blend in a clean signal...
__________________
Sadowsky Club #259|Gallien Krueger Club #922
EBMM Club #70|Modulus Mob #8
Effects Addict #14|Mesa Boogie Club #33
| 
01-07-2013, 10:16 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kent, UK | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CL400Peavey Unless your cab is already specifically set up to run stereo like some 810's are, imho its a waste of time and effort. Just run your whole signal through an 810. | Ah I've never heard of a stereo 810?? And I'm just asking in a general way. I blend my signals, one amp, one cab, easy option. | 
01-07-2013, 10:25 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Las Cruces, NM | | | SWR Megoliath. It's an 8 x 10 that is basically two 4 x 10's in one big box. Each has it's own input. | 
01-07-2013, 10:41 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Vancouver WA | | | I have a modified Powerhouse 1000 (4 x 10",1 x 15") , it has been split into two seperate signal chains. I run the 4 x 10"s full range and my effects are only in this path . The 15" signal is run through an electronic crossover that limits it 600hz. I have replaced the original 15" EV with an Eminence 3015LF . How does it work ? After some sorting and crossover tweaking...... Amazing is the best way I can describe it.
Many will scoff and say you can't have both in the same cabinet , and while I would normally agree , I can't argue with what I am hearing. Crisp killer fuzz and distortions , and modulation effects with no loss of low end clarity and performance.
__________________
Hollowbody # 334,WA Bassist# 55
MM Sterling Club # 142
| 
01-07-2013, 10:44 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kent, UK | | Ah cool. But that's what I mean. It's easy enough to split an 810. Two 8ohm 410s, svt 4 pro clean one side. Dirty other? Just seems weird it hasn't been done/mentioned before? But cool.
I'm actually in a 'slimming down' mood at the mo. Now I'm playing out a lot more with an originals project I'm getting everything put together for a speedy setup, I've just pulled the trigger on a Fender TB-600 that I'm gonna rack, along with my pedals.
I'm hoping the tuner in the TB's foot switch is decent enough to use then I can have just that out front. I can use the onboard tube od, which has surely gotta be better than the boss odb-3 I use now? And then something else in the fx loop as that's switchable. There's the vari q.. All racked with spare cables batts etc in the box. Easy  | 
01-07-2013, 10:55 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: boston, ma | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeneo Ah I've never heard of a stereo 810?? And I'm just asking in a general way. I blend my signals, one amp, one cab, easy option. | Most modern ampeg 8x10s are this way. I believe starting with the early 2000s models. They have a full output jack and stereo 8 ohm 4x10 jacks ( see pdf manual here). | 
01-07-2013, 11:00 AM
| | | | All effects have a dry/web mix
Keep some of the dry signal in the mix.
Trying to do this with amps, Out in front a clean and dirty just mix in the air by themselves.
It's all summed at some point or you'd never be able to record it, mic it, or DI it.
No need for alchemy of trying to co-amp, but if you have the time and money, there's no harm in it other than wasting time and money.
__________________
My opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis. I analyze all factors before making a choice. I update my opinions to include new facts. Fallacies? No?
| 
01-07-2013, 11:04 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Winnipeg Manitoba, Canada | | | I'm running a clean/dirty rig into my Boogie 4X12 full range.
Crest Prolite 2.0 2 channel power amp, two Sansamp RBI's, one clean, one dirty. Allows me to keep all of my low end dialed in but add a nice gritty edge to my tone also.
Super happy with this rig. | 
01-07-2013, 11:11 AM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by seamonkey All effects have a dry/web mix
Keep some of the dry signal in the mix. | No they don't. Some do but they're not nearly as common as those that don't.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
01-07-2013, 11:17 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kent, UK | | | That's the beauty of all this music malarkey. There's essentially no wrong way of doing things. If it sounds good to you then it is.
And @lowliferumble. That sounds pretty epic. I knew at least one person would be doing this in one cab. All be it with some modification. | 
01-07-2013, 01:07 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: White Plains | | Quote:
Originally Posted by seamonkey All effects have a dry/web mix
Keep some of the dry signal in the mix.
Trying to do this with amps, Out in front a clean and dirty just mix in the air by themselves.
It's all summed at some point or you'd never be able to record it, mic it, or DI it.
No need for alchemy of trying to co-amp, but if you have the time and money, there's no harm in it other than wasting time and money. | They they don't.
A lot of effects can suck the lows right out of your tone. Blending in a clean signal with the effected signal brings it right back in.
__________________
Sadowsky Club #259|Gallien Krueger Club #922
EBMM Club #70|Modulus Mob #8
Effects Addict #14|Mesa Boogie Club #33
| 
01-07-2013, 01:33 PM
| | | | Yes sure same idea in theory
__________________
My opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis. I analyze all factors before making a choice. I update my opinions to include new facts. Fallacies? No?
| 
01-07-2013, 01:42 PM
| | | | yah its a waste of time.
Blender pedals ohhh awww, alot of pedals in the 80's had Dry/wet knobs for this reason. | 
01-07-2013, 01:49 PM
|  | Get low! Endorsing: J Worrell Bass | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Dayton OH | | | I think that I would rather cart around an extra blend pedal or fork up for pedals with wet/dry mix knobs rather than buy and bring a whole extra cabinet. Heck, my Mesa Buster has a wet/dry effects loop blend onboard. | 
01-07-2013, 04:26 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | I just get pedals that work without needing a blend. I don't like being able to tell there's a blend going on, and there's a real fine line between getting the blend right and wrong.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
01-07-2013, 05:24 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Melbourne, Australia | | | I've toyed with this a couple of times but at the moment I have different objectives.
My plan was to run the bass through a Y box, one side to my GK and 410 (clean), the other side to a separate 210 being driven by a tube guitar amp with an overdrive preset. I decided against it basically because it would be stupidly expensive to facilitate and would probably sound like badly mixed balls@ck. | 
01-07-2013, 06:07 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: White Plains | | Quote:
Originally Posted by IPYF I decided against it basically because it would be stupidly expensive to facilitate and would probably sound like badly mixed balls@ck. | Lots of bassists do this and it can sound great. Yes, it can be expensive.
__________________
Sadowsky Club #259|Gallien Krueger Club #922
EBMM Club #70|Modulus Mob #8
Effects Addict #14|Mesa Boogie Club #33
| 
01-07-2013, 06:11 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Doesn't have to be expensive, but it will cost more than just having a single amp and cab. But I think it's a great way to go if your dirty amp is a low power tube amp cranked.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |