Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-05-2011, 02:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Finally A/B'd My B15 and B18 and What A Surprise

Sign in to disble this ad
I finally got around to comparing my '70s Ampeg B15N that I've had for a few years to the 1960s (I'm thinking 1966) B18N that I picked up just a few months ago. The B15 has a replacement Dukane speaker; the B18 is all original but retains only one factory tube, the V4 which is a Sylvania 7199. My amp tech said the V4 is weak (testing at 300/600, with 375 the acceptable minimum), but he didn't think the weak tube was impacting the amp's performance.

For the comparison both amps were sitting directly on the floor (no carts) and the tone controls were identical with treble at 9:00, bass at 3:00 and the volume trimmed so they were at the same level; on the B15 the tone-enhancing rocker switches were off.

I played four jazz standards (fingerstyle) and one U2 tune (with a heavy pick) using a passive Bill Nash '57 Precision with Fender heavy gauge flats and an active 1987 Musicman Stingray with Ernie Ball roundwounds (45-105 gauge).

I was really surprised by the results. As expected, both amps gave a warm, full classic bass tone. But the B15 was both louder and bassier than the B18. I don't know if this was due to the weak tube in the B18 or the difference in the cabinet design. The B15 also seemed to respond quicker to a note.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Portaflexes.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	413.6 KB
ID:	226458  
  #2  
Old 09-05-2011, 04:20 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
Don't know about the response thing, but all speakers respond at the same speed, so it must have been a little extra mid and high beaming that caused it.

As for the lows, I have not heard a B-18 in person, but I believe it. The 70's Thiele cab is a lot larger than previous B-15 cabs, and has a low end response that is to die for. I could see where the B-18, which has a larger box but a bigger speaker, could have less low end.

Now what's truly weird, though, is that the new Ampeg PF115he is a sealed cab the same size as the early B-15 cabs and actually goes lower than the double baffle cabs I have, which are ported. It's kind of like a Thiele on the bottom and a double baffle on top. I'm sure the speaker has a lot to do with that, but it blew me away, and reinforced my belief that you can't judge a cab by appearances alone.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #3  
Old 09-05-2011, 05:52 PM
Supportive Fender
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Supporting Member
the obvious next step is to swap heads and see which characteristics follow the amps or stay with the speakers.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, VA Beach
  #4  
Old 09-05-2011, 06:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Having a strong 7199 phase inverter in the B18 is important for this sort of test.

The signals from this tube drive the power tubes. With a weak output, the power tubes will not be driven to full power.

So the B18 is not being used to its full potential.
__________________
Official Ampeg Portaflex Club #89
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.