Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-21-2010, 01:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Help w/SWR Workingman's 12

Sign in to disble this ad
Hi, I am a newbie and a beginning bass player and I was looking to pick up a SWR Workingman's 12 Combo amp. As I was doing my research, I came upon the comments from sellers regarding pre and post-fender models. My question is what is the difference between a pre-fender and a post fender WM 12? And which would be better assuming condition and price were the same.
  #2  
Old 04-21-2010, 05:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
GOLD Supporting Member
Probably insignificant
  #3  
Old 04-21-2010, 05:52 AM
JOME77's Avatar
Providing the Lowend for the High One
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bonaire, GA (near Macon)
Supporting Member
+1

It's just another example of the typical attitude that when a small company gets bought out by a larger company the quality always goes downhill.
I doubt that you would notice any difference in the quality of a SWR WM12 combo. It is what it is. Just try to find one that's been cared for.
__________________
Joe

My Recordings on Soundcloud

Central Baptist Worship and Sermons

Georgia Bassist #21
**************************************
His Grace is enough....
  #4  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Thanks for the input!
  #5  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Massachusetts
actually the older ones were 100 watts with a celestion speaker (I owned one) The newer ones do 120 watts and have a more generic speaker, not sure what it is.

Like the others said, no real big difference.
__________________
thegroovestreetband.com
Bag End Club Member #15
  #6  
Old 04-21-2010, 10:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
In my humble opinion...
Save a couple more dollars and get the SWR Workingsman's 15.
Why? Sooner than you might expect, you are going to get oppertunities to play in a band or "open mic" jams.
The 15 @ 120 watts will push enough air in the room to make you happy. The 12 won't.
The WM 15 is a great combo. The aural enhancer and transparency functions make it a good sounding unit.
  #7  
Old 04-21-2010, 12:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alameda, California
The only reason I can think of to prefer the older WM12's is that they used 8-ohm internal speakers and had a jack for an 8-ohm extension speaker. With an efficient extension cab, they're usable for moderate volume gigs (I use one with an extension cab in a jazz ensemble). I recently checked the specs on the new Working Pro model and it uses a 4-ohm internal speaker so you're maxed out with the combo and can't add an extension.
  #8  
Old 04-21-2010, 01:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by COBRARI View Post
In my humble opinion...
Save a couple more dollars and get the SWR Workingsman's 15.
Why? Sooner than you might expect, you are going to get oppertunities to play in a band or "open mic" jams.
The 15 @ 120 watts will push enough air in the room to make you happy. The 12 won't.
The WM 15 is a great combo. The aural enhancer and transparency functions make it a good sounding unit.
Thank you!! That's exactly what I did, I picked up the SWR Workingsman 15 from JumboJack and it's great. I have the equipment...now I just need to learn how to play! Hopefully, soon I'll be able to fill in at my church.
  #9  
Old 04-21-2010, 01:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by COBRARI View Post
The 15 @ 120 watts will push enough air in the room to make you happy. The 12 won't.
The WM 15 is a great combo. The aural enhancer and transparency functions make it a good sounding unit.
My 2004 version has 160 watts with internal speaker and 200 watts with exteral 8ohm speaker. When did they increase from 120 watts to 160 watts? Does this coincide with Fender's purchase of SWR? Mine doesn't have the front "shelve" and the carpeting is a very dark blue.
  #10  
Old 04-21-2010, 02:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassjam99 View Post
Thank you!! That's exactly what I did, I picked up the SWR Workingsman 15 from JumboJack and it's great. I have the equipment...now I just need to learn how to play! Hopefully, soon I'll be able to fill in at my church.
Congrats! That WM15 is nice. Should be plenty.
__________________
thegroovestreetband.com
Bag End Club Member #15
  #11  
Old 04-21-2010, 08:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Bassjam99...
You are set man! You won't need nuttin' but a whole lot of
practice, practice and .... practice.

Modell...
Whenever you split the impedance (ohms) in half you double the current (amps). The voltage (fixed at 120 volts) is inversely proportional with the amps. If an amp says "120/160 watts" they are stating that you will get more power out of the amp by cutting the resistance in half by adding another
speaker (ohm load) to the unit. When you read " 1 million watts at 2 ohms" don't buy it. Something has to give with the
voltage being constant (120 volts). The current which is heat.
Heat burns things up.
  #12  
Old 04-21-2010, 08:58 PM
Lync's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Supporting Member
IMO SWR decreased in quality control when they went from SWR Engineering to SWR Sound (went to Fender after this). Being bought out by Fender seemed to help the company.
  #13  
Old 04-21-2010, 09:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: an ignore list near you
Quote:
Originally Posted by MODELL View Post
My 2004 version has 160 watts with internal speaker and 200 watts with exteral 8ohm speaker. When did they increase from 120 watts to 160 watts? Does this coincide with Fender's purchase of SWR? Mine doesn't have the front "shelve" and the carpeting is a very dark blue.
I don't know when the Fender buyout was (2002?) but I'm going to guess the Workingman's 15 combo wattage increase was around 1999 when the Workingman's 2004 head with the same ratings was introduced. I can't speak for quality control of the later stuff, but I have a WM 160 that was submerged in brackish water for a few days and it still works. I always thought the SWR Engineering stuff looked cleaner and classier, anyway.

Mike
__________________
You can't put a price on cool, but if you could it would be $BLIMP.00

Portal to the Land of Awesome: http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f217/toy-blimp-giveaway-644521/

Last edited by mike_v_s : 04-21-2010 at 09:59 PM.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.