![]() |
Help! Wattage for 1976 SVT 8x10 Hey everyone! I have been google searching for weeks trying to find out what the wattage rating is for a 1976 Ampeg SVT 8x10 Cabinet. It has only one 4ohm 1/4" jack on the back. I cannot find any useful information about this despite all of my google searching. I want to make sure that I will not blow out these speakers as they sound awesome. Right now I have a Peavey Delta Bass head running it and would like to move up to something better but not knowing what this cab can truly handle I am a little cautious. Thanks for your help! |
Well! Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Umm! Quote:
Or I would choose an amp of any power you like the sound of with the cabinet and be careful of your levels based on what it sounds like.:bassist: |
Quote:
|
I was checking out an old SVT 810 flatback to use with my fender bassman 300. Had the same concerns. If I remember correctly from my research, them old original SVT 810s are rated at 240 watts. I believe they're meant to be ran with another. So 2 810s. I did find another, but 2 of them costs to much and defeats my purpose. I only want to lug around one cab. Right now I'm using an older mesa boogie RR 410 with the mesa powerhouse 212. I like it a lot. I would just rather 1 cab. Like an 810 or 412 |
300 tube watts is quite capable of giving you a bad day if you don't pay attention to Bassmec's earlier posts. |
Probably the 240 Watt rating belongs to the CTS speakers. For a SVT cab made in 1976 the speakers should be the Eminence square back. These speakers come with a 2" voice coil and therefore the RMS rating should be greater then 50 Watt. But remember that no engineer can predict the amount of wattage exactly. Wattage ratings is all the time based on a modelilng. That's very similar like a weather forecast (modelling). |
Oh! So do you think it would be ok to use the old square backs with a fender bassman 300? Would it be ok to really crank it? Or would I be pushing it to hard? |
Quote:
But this wattage is measured with a sine wave. At real live with a bass guitar signal the RMS is appro 1/2 or less. But be sure that transients are at full power/voltage most of the time. But transients aren't RMS and RMS isn't transients. Many years ago I used a 212 cab rated to 250 Watt, and sometimes I used a 410 cab which was rated to 240 Watt. Yeah it's possible to discuss a very lot on amp wattage and cab wattage, but it's most of the time likewise comparing apples and oranges, so what. The SVT 810 cab is a sealed cab, that means the actual power handling is probably significant different to same RMS watt rating of vented cabs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Considering general using with some random audible clipping I don't see any reasons to debate on principles. |
Well; the SVT head was rated at 300 watts. So, in lieu of any other info, I'd say the cab would be, more or less, good for that. |
Depends on your definition of "more or less" and "good for". OP seems to want to be told to crank those watts with no fear. Not going to happen! |
Also true. |
I would be conservative and say 240W. But JimmyM has pushed his flatback with slightly more and it supposedly took it fine. The SVT was supposed to be ran into 2 of these cabs, back in the days. |
I would love to run two flat backs with my bassman 300! I've located two of them too! I just can't spend that kind of money right now. Darn. My RR 410 with my powerhouse 212 sounds pretty damn good though. Any opinions on that combination? |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.