|  | 
08-12-2011, 08:12 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Ottawa, On | | | Which Hole to Stick it in? (Active/Passive Inputs)
Sign in to disble this ad
Hey TBers,
Quick question, on an amp with both Active and Passive inputs, which would you plug your Active/Passive bass into?!
My guess is the what ever one you play more but I never gave it much thought till now...
Did the usuall search before you ask thing.
Cheers & Keep on Groovin' | 
08-12-2011, 08:28 AM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | | The input labeled "active" justs cuts the level of your instrument signal, to reduce clipping at the input if you have a very high-output bass. It doesn't actually have anything to do with active or passive. | 
08-12-2011, 08:30 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seweracuse, NY | | | If you stick it in the hole in back, I hear it gets louder.
__________________ fEARful: for those who want something better: http://greenboy.us/fEARful/ For Sale (locally only): Bergantino HT115 with Cover: $500.00. PM me about it. | 
08-12-2011, 08:30 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Atlanta, Ga. | | | Take into consideration that some passive basses have a hotter signal than a active bass..... I would just try both inputs and see which one produces the sound you like.....
__________________
Georgia Bassist Club Member # 3
Gallien-Krueger® Club Member # 868
| 
08-12-2011, 08:33 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Horten,Norway | | Quote:
Originally Posted by BurningSkies If you stick it in the hole in back, I hear it gets louder. | 
__________________
My spoon is too big.
| 
08-12-2011, 08:34 AM
| | | | Well it really depends. Most of the time the input for an active bass just attenuates the signal. Meaning that if you have a passive bass with strong pickups verry close to the strings and you play agressivly it may also be a good idea to use the active input.
For instance when using my passive bass with a Marshall MB4210 I find it is better to use the -10dB pad, otherwise I get some mild distortion as I dig in harder.
If you have an active bass I'd recomend using an input for active basses, otherwise you may overload the preamp input. | 
08-12-2011, 08:41 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Ottawa, On | | Thanks gents,
guess I should dust off that old manual and give her a read sometime  | 
08-12-2011, 09:23 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Illinois, USA | | | MOST active inputs, as note above, only attenuate the signal before the first gain stage. I always suggest using the passive input as first choice. IFF ("if and only if") you find you can't get a clean signal using the passive input, then try the active one. You won't damage anything using the passive input.
I recall that some early Trace-Elliot amps had a different input impedance for their active inputs which would alter the high end response if you used them with a passive bass.
John
__________________
JTE Spelling, grammar, and punctuation do matter, despite the threats of death by grease fire!
"Without space, music is just noise piling up on itself." TRK
Lakland Owners' Club # 248
| 
08-12-2011, 09:34 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: South Central PA | | | I have an active ibanez but find that the active input cuts the sound too much. I'm able to get some back by tweaking the eq and settings on the bass but even with those settings, when I plug back into the passive...it just booms..sounds much better! | 
08-12-2011, 09:36 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seweracuse, NY | | | Active inputs used to be effective back before people designed bass preamps to have unity gain when engaged. Some may not remember, but there was a time when most active electronics meant that you were getting a serious boost in output.
__________________ fEARful: for those who want something better: http://greenboy.us/fEARful/ For Sale (locally only): Bergantino HT115 with Cover: $500.00. PM me about it. | 
08-12-2011, 10:50 AM
|  | Banned Endorsing Artist: HCAF | | Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: The Woodlands, TX | | why not just try them both? 
its not like there's a ton of options here.
also most all amps tread their padded or "active" inputs differently so it's impossible to say across the board how they react to every kind of bass. | 
08-12-2011, 11:01 AM
|  | One lab accident away from being a supervillain | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Powder Springs, Ga | | | That choice is a matter of personal preference and, possibly, alcohol consumption.
__________________
I'd much rather be the least talented Beatle than the most talented Foo Fighter.
| 
08-12-2011, 04:40 PM
| | | | The passive input is usually high impedance, the active low.
They also attenuate the active because in most cases it will be hotter than the passive.
Low impedance source to a low impedance input will get you the best signal to noise, and best frequency response. My bases have level adjustment pots inside so I can turn down the signal if it's too hot. I wish they had the same adjustments for amps just another little pot next to the active input.
__________________
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." - Neil DeGrasse Tyson 2011
| 
08-12-2011, 07:25 PM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by seamonkey The passive input is usually high impedance, the active low. | That's usually just a side effect of using a series resistor to pad the input--it's not a design feature. Quote: |
Low impedance source to a low impedance input will get you the best signal to noise, and best frequency response.
| Uh, no. The relevant issue is having HIGH-enough input impedance relative to the source impedance. You almost never want a low input impedance, except insofar as a relatively low z is "sufficient" with a buffered source. | 
08-12-2011, 07:56 PM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Active inputs suck. Blech. Tone killers.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
08-13-2011, 10:02 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Portland, OR. | | | So, if I run my bass into a Sansamp to a Big Muff, do I want to go into active? That's the way I used to plug in to an Acoustic SS, and it sounded fine.
What about my SVT? Is it unsafe to plug in to the -0 input?
__________________
It's all about the tone.
| 
08-13-2011, 12:16 PM
|  | OVNIFX EXAR pedals rep for North & Central America | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PDX, OR | | | Dude. Read the posts in this thead. | 
08-13-2011, 12:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: northeast Ohio | | | my ex gf never really cared. Gosh, I miss her.
__________________
I'm a weapon of mass distortion.
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |