Quote:
Originally Posted by 6stringbassist Sound wise etc.
The Puma 500 is at the top of my budget. There's about a £100 difference in the two.
Thanks ! |
Hello!
I own and dig both and have a number of comparisons between the two heads posted on my youtube channel.
In a nutshell, the Puma extends MUCH deeper (huge, deep, low end extension that really gets the speakers pistoning) and also extends way up in the sizzle range in the upper treble region. EQ points are excellent for adding burp, etc. The F500 is tighter and more mid punchy, and not quite as sizzly up top, although I find I can get to about 80% of the Puma's low end and top end and smooth, creamy mids by engaging the F500's VPF filter (contour) at around 9 o'clock (which extends the low end and treble and smooths the mids).
Both are great. I find the F500 really works for me better on the gig, since it is tighter and more focused (and hence sounds louder in a mix). That super wide, extended frequency response of the Puma sounds AMAZING at home, and also in more 'refined contexts' (jazz trio work, etc.), but tends to sound a little less punchy and defined in denser mixes/more aggressive music contexts.
Both are A+ units though, and I totally dig them both for what they are. If someone would put a gun to my head and said I could only keep one, it would be the F500 though.