Marshall 1992LEM

sickest beast · #1 10-12-2011, 10:25 PM

I strongly believe Marshall should have simply reissued the classic JMP Super Bass instead of slapping all the Lemmy signature stuff on it. I'm sure it's been said before, but it's bumming me out.

Anyone agree? Disagree?

Does Lemmy's marketability outweigh the demand for the original amp itself? Marshall must have crunched some numbers on this.

I can't see a lot of players wanting a 100 watt distortion machine, I'd love to know how many 1992LEMs have been sold.

sickest beast · #2 10-12-2011, 10:35 PM

just found out the 1992LEM is made to order.

JimmyM · #3 10-12-2011, 11:34 PM

bassvi · #4 10-13-2011, 12:17 AM

Agree, a regular Superbass without the added signature pricing would be awesome. I would buy one.

sickest beast · #5 10-13-2011, 11:29 PM

One quick pro and one quick con about the Marshall 1992LEM, it's introduction has made the original Super Bass amps much more sought after but unfortunately a hell of a lot more expensive.