|  | 
01-30-2012, 03:07 AM
| | | | My 30 year old Marshall versus Ampeg?
Sign in to disble this ad
This is my first post... hi
I have a 100 watt Marshall integrated bass system (transistor combo) bought in 1984.
I am only home recording now, and due to it's size I am thinking of replacing it with an Ampeg BA 108 practice amp. I can't try one so I'm asking here what sort of difference there would be in tone and volume?
Thanks. | 
01-30-2012, 04:29 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Tasmania, Australia | | | Heaps-both.
A fair bit less volume & probly the Ampeg tone. Obvious but likely imo, but I've not used either of those amps.
For home recording tho,I can't see why it's not a wise choice.
& welcome to TB!
__________________
BONZA#32,Ampeg#34,EBMM#106,P-bass#581,Alleva-Coppolo, Rickenbacker Club #450, Lakland, Bergantino#32, BIG cabs club#16
| 
01-30-2012, 04:46 AM
| | | | How much is a 30 year old Marshall (like mine) worth out of interest, I have no idea? | 
01-30-2012, 06:28 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Cincinnati OH | | | I don't think the SS marshall stuff commands much in the vintage gear trade. Someone jump in if I'm wrong.
__________________
Ohio Bassists member #11
Official Ampeg Portaflex Owners Club member #69
| 
01-30-2012, 06:36 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Dallas, TX | | | No need for an amp to record bass at all. Go direct and play with eq, compression and whatever afterwards. Clean direct bass always works.
__________________
edit signature
| 
01-30-2012, 07:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Tasmania, Australia | | True, & if the MArshall sounds good as is.... One can ALWAYS turn it down 
But have heard that the li'l Ampeg BA 108,110,112 amps are very nice.
__________________
BONZA#32,Ampeg#34,EBMM#106,P-bass#581,Alleva-Coppolo, Rickenbacker Club #450, Lakland, Bergantino#32, BIG cabs club#16
| 
01-31-2012, 01:17 AM
| | | | DI bass can sound a bit lifeless, unless money is spent on good quality preamps and DI's. | 
01-31-2012, 01:32 AM
|  | Registered User Atypical, not a typical... | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Carlisle, PA | | | The older Marshall stuff is not worth much. If it was a DBS head, it'll range anywhere from $250 to $800 depending on model and condition...
The next one to have is the Jubillie head... The 3560. They can sell for $400 and under, or a little more if the case and cab are included.
The IBS stuff is really just 200 watt solid state stuff. Sounds not bad, heavy as hell, and boring looking. I have seen these amps sell on eBay for under $200. | 
01-31-2012, 11:33 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | Tone, I don't know. Volume difference would likely be pretty significant. I have a BA108 and it sounds just like Ampeg amps should sound, but doesn't get loud. For me, the sweet spot of the BA line is the BA112, and if I were recording with it, that would be the one I'd get, but I do love my little BA108 and I use it all the time on an old timey jazz gig I do most weekends. For $100 you can't beat it.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
01-31-2012, 11:55 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: austin,tx | | If you're going for the traditional Ampeg tone, I'd think that'd be a cheap way to get it on tape as your starting point for mixing. Quiet enough you could incorporate a mic'd speaker without waking up the neighbors as well.
Showing my age there^^....."tape".  | 
02-01-2012, 01:02 AM
| | | | Thanks for the replies.
I've just had to get my Marshall fixed - part of the power unit went. Cost me £25. I think I'll have to sell it now as it does need replacing. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |