Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Orange Isobaric (Smart Power) cabs dispersion

Sign in to disble this ad
I've been reading a lot about dispersion lately and was curious how the one-behind-the-other speaker configuration in these fared and if there were any other problems with them. Thanks physics geniuses!
__________________
John
  #2  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:44 PM
tombowlus's Avatar
iPhone/iPad, Droid, and Kindle apps now available!

Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North central Ohio
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thylacine Dream View Post
I've been reading a lot about dispersion lately and was curious how the one-behind-the-other speaker configuration in these fared and if there were any other problems with them. Thanks physics geniuses!
West tested the SP210 and SP212 in issue #6, and their off-axis performance was pretty good.
__________________
Bass Gear Magazine - free digital subs or paid print subs. Issue #7 e-mag now available!

Find us on Facebook, and download the free app for iPhone/iPad, Android or Kindle.
  #3  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
Dispersion would be the same as any other cab with the front speaker(s) alignment. The isobaric design re-enforces the lows.
  #4  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by will33
Dispersion would be the same as any other cab with the front speaker(s) alignment. The isobaric design re-enforces the lows.
And what exactly is the front speaker(s) alignment? Thanks tons tom, that review's really informative
__________________
John
  #5  
Old 10-11-2011, 03:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
For example a regular 110 or 112 cab, the dispersion would be the same as that.
  #6  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:55 PM
BassmanPaul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
GOLD Supporting Member
Thing is with these cabinets that you get a smaller cabinet but twice the driver weight. Add to that that the output from the cabs will only be around that of half the installed drivers. A 4x10 will get you the output of a 2x10.
__________________
Paul
  #7  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Oh okay. Yeah, I was reading that in the review, Paul, and I'm certainly glad I did. I guess they're better suited to recording and/or those with more money than myself. Thanks all!
  #8  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Different question, but maybe I can get it answered here rather than start a new thread:
If I were to vertically stack 2 Avatar 2x10s, which have the tweeter between the speakers, would it make more sense to have the tweeters lined up with one another so that they are closer to, or rather, farther away from the drums and/or other players' amps and why?

Last edited by Thylacine Dream : 10-11-2011 at 10:20 PM.
  #9  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
Don't know that it'd make much difference. Although with them closer to the drummer, he MIGHT catch a little more attack from your notes, stay locked in better....maybe. In cabs with mid drivers I like them to be on the drummers side of the cab. He actually can hear those frequencies better from a little "wrap around" the side of the cab. The sound doesn't actually wrap around but he can hear more of the edge of the mids radiation pattern than if it's across the cab from him.
  #10  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Hm, I was thinking from the audience's perspective, but it's probably more important that the band get an edge than that I get an edge. Thanks, man
  #11  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
From the audience perspective there's no difference. The sound from the woofers and tweeter is all summed together by the time it's just a few feet or less in front of the cab. You can experiment with that yourself. When your ear is 6" or so from the cab you can hear different frequencies coming from different sources. You don't have to get very far away before you can't hear and pinpoint the different sources anymore and it becomes mixed together as one cohesive sound.
  #12  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas, TX 75218, USA
Ah, well I'm OCD so I still appreciate you telling me the wraparound thing that'll give me the slightest edge
__________________
John
  #13  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
I should add that the little listening experiment in my previous post is most revealing if you do it with your eyes shut. Your brain WILL automatically look at the small speaker when it hears high sounds.
  #14  
Old 10-12-2011, 12:23 AM
Supportive Fender
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by BassmanPaul View Post
Thing is with these cabinets that you get a smaller cabinet but twice the driver weight. Add to that that the output from the cabs will only be around that of half the installed drivers. A 4x10 will get you the output of a 2x10.
yeah, my impression of the little 10+10 orange box was that you got the size and volume output of a single 10 cab with the low end and power-handling of a 2x10.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, VA Beach
  #15  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:29 AM
lug lug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: League City, Tx
In theory an isobaric design let's you get the same freq response out of a cab 1/2 the size of a "normal" setup. Upside, much smaller cab, downside, you have to pay for 2 drivers and added weight but still get the same power level as one driver. Expensive way to shrink a cab, that's why you don't see a lot of manufacturers use this technique. I always felt that the use of neo speakers could lead to fairly decent sounding and weighing micro-cabs. but will still only for those with the greenbacks!
__________________
Lefty Union Member #26 G&L Club Member #2, Rickenbacker Club #4 Acoustic Club #2 Jag Club Member #2 T-40 club #15 Medium Bass Club #58 Korg Pandora club #2
  #16  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:42 AM
tombowlus's Avatar
iPhone/iPad, Droid, and Kindle apps now available!

Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North central Ohio
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by lug View Post
In theory an isobaric design let's you get the same freq response out of a cab 1/2 the size of a "normal" setup. Upside, much smaller cab, downside, you have to pay for 2 drivers and added weight but still get the same power level as one driver. Expensive way to shrink a cab, that's why you don't see a lot of manufacturers use this technique. I always felt that the use of neo speakers could lead to fairly decent sounding and weighing micro-cabs. but will still only for those with the greenbacks!
Keep in mind, with the isobaric design, you do get the power handling of all of the drivers. You only get the output level of half of them.
__________________
Bass Gear Magazine - free digital subs or paid print subs. Issue #7 e-mag now available!

Find us on Facebook, and download the free app for iPhone/iPad, Android or Kindle.
  #17  
Old 10-13-2011, 08:55 AM
lug lug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: League City, Tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by tombowlus View Post
Keep in mind, with the isobaric design, you do get the power handling of all of the drivers. You only get the output level of half of them.
Yep, poor wording on my part. Output level a much better term, less confusing.
__________________
Lefty Union Member #26 G&L Club Member #2, Rickenbacker Club #4 Acoustic Club #2 Jag Club Member #2 T-40 club #15 Medium Bass Club #58 Korg Pandora club #2
  #18  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Isobaric arrangement is really meant for lows.
Nobody in HiFi ever use one for Midrange, and there is a big lack of information on using them this way.

For subs, Wikipedia clears up a lot of the confusion. Nothing is mentioned if you venture into midrange frequencies.

I could imagine the cones don't act like pistons on higher midrange and this may have some effect. The measurements would say it all. If Bass Gear Magazine measured it and publish polar charts then it is what it is.

IMHO - this cab should be looked at like a black box with frequency and dispersion measurements, including weight, size, sensitivity, and Max SPL.
__________________
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." - Neil DeGrasse Tyson 2011
  #19  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by tombowlus View Post
Keep in mind, with the isobaric design, you do get the power handling of all of the drivers. You only get the output level of half of them.
Interesting stuff. I guess, like everyone says, there is no free lunch.

From literally zero knowledge about this, it seems like the performance of this design is a bit like the super duty, high xmax drivers. It takes more power to get them to full volume (assuming that 'power handling' translates into 'needing more power'.... might be wrong there), and you can get a lot more bottom than you would expect out of a little box, but the absolute max volume output is still somewhat reduced due to the low end frequencies being extended.

If that is the case (and it surely might not be... just interested in the discussion), this seems like a kind of 'old fashioned' way to get there, given the frequency response of some of the newer drivers out there, resulting it more weight due to the double drivers, baffle boards, etc.

Interesting though, and a few of my buddies who have played these cabs were impressed with the tone.
  #20  
Old 10-13-2011, 01:16 PM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thylacine Dream View Post
Different question, but maybe I can get it answered here rather than start a new thread:
If I were to vertically stack 2 Avatar 2x10s, which have the tweeter between the speakers, would it make more sense to have the tweeters lined up with one another so that they are closer to, or rather, farther away from the drums and/or other players' amps and why?
Unless the cab is pointed at the drummer he won't hear anything from the tweeters. If he has difficulties hearing you rotate the lower cab to aim at him, leave the upper cab aiming out at you and the audience.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.