Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-26-2011, 12:28 PM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Port tuning

Sign in to disble this ad
I am tuning the ports on a generic 2x10 cab that I bought used recently.

The cab has inside dimensions of 14.5" X 20.5" x 15.875" and an internal brace that is 3.75" x .5" x 15.875"

I am guesstimating the speaker displacement and the brace to be .1 cu. ft. (I am still waiting on a reply from Eminence for the exact speaker displacement).

This yields a displacement of 2.613 cu. ft.

There are two 3" ports.

Using an online calculator at mh-audio.nl, I came up with a port length of 2.532"

This is my first time attempting this, and don't know if there is anything else to consider, such as cabinet damping material. I am going to replace the fiberglass insulation with Acousti-Stuff. Does damping material affect the equation? I have read that it effectively raises the displacement. Is there anything else I need to consider?

The drivers are Eminence and came from an SWR Workingman's cab. Here are the T/S Specs:

05-RE OHMS 4.16
06-LE MH .59
07-QM 3.35
08-QE .380
09-QT .340
10-XMAX MM 3.50
11-BL TM 10.89
12-EFF % 1.87
13-FS HZ 55.26
14-MMS GMS 31.40
15-CMS mm/N .2641
16-RMS NS/M 3.2585
17-VAS LTRS 44.12
18-SD SCM 344.88
19-EBP 144.4
20-SPL dB 94.7

Last edited by J42 : 01-26-2011 at 01:54 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-26-2011, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, Connecticut, USA
Don't worry about the acoustic fill's effect on your parameters. The effect (if there is any) would be negligible.
  #3  
Old 01-26-2011, 04:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wausau, WI
Acoustic fill (as opposed to lining the walls) is only used for sealed cabs. Only line the walls of the cab if you are porting it.

What are you trying to tune the cab to?
__________________
fEARful...that's about as good as it gets.
  #4  
Old 01-26-2011, 05:22 PM
Robby Hoinsky's Avatar
President, Art of Noise Audio

Art of Noise Audio, fEARful™ builder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Haven, CT
Send a message via AIM to Robby Hoinsky Send a message via Skype™ to Robby Hoinsky
Supporting Member
download winisd and plug the parameters into it. subtract the port volume from the internal volume and play around with port tunings.
__________________
President, Art of Noise Audio
www.fEARfulbass.com
  #5  
Old 01-26-2011, 05:57 PM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundogue View Post
What are you trying to tune the cab to?
I have calculated for 55.26 Hz, which is the Fs of the drivers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Hoinsky View Post
...play around with port tunings.
What is the best way to do that?
  #6  
Old 01-26-2011, 07:34 PM
Registered User

Bass player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Downunder Oz
You have to get a few lengths & try it.If its no good you can then shorten it or get a longer tube.The different lengths will give you different tunings.Just to play around you can get them cardboard tubes they have for posting stuff through the mail untill you can get the proper tube.I got mine from the net but you can use plumbing pipes also.
It also depends if the tube is wider on one end then the other.
  #7  
Old 01-27-2011, 06:55 AM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Are there test tones that I need to run through the cab, or am I just listening for the sound I like best?
  #8  
Old 01-27-2011, 09:08 AM
Robby Hoinsky's Avatar
President, Art of Noise Audio

Art of Noise Audio, fEARful™ builder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Haven, CT
Send a message via AIM to Robby Hoinsky Send a message via Skype™ to Robby Hoinsky
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by J42 View Post
I have calculated for 55.26 Hz, which is the Fs of the drivers.



What is the best way to do that?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=winisd

then download winisd

open it and create a new driver

insert all the parameters that you have available

then select the driver and select a vented cabinet

it will come up with it's recommendation, ignore this and plug in the airspace you have available minus the airspace taken up by the would be port.

select the tuning frequency and it will automatically select the port length. It will then generate a graph based on it.

repeat the steps with a different tuning and compare response graphs.

Robby
__________________
President, Art of Noise Audio
www.fEARfulbass.com
  #9  
Old 01-27-2011, 01:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wausau, WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robby Hoinsky View Post
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=winisd

then download winisd

open it and create a new driver

insert all the parameters that you have available

then select the driver and select a vented cabinet

it will come up with it's recommendation, ignore this and plug in the airspace you have available minus the airspace taken up by the would be port.

select the tuning frequency and it will automatically select the port length. It will then generate a graph based on it.

repeat the steps with a different tuning and compare response graphs.

Robby
+1. Also, make sure you use WinISD Pro and check out the plots for cone excursion based on your tuning frequency. I use the Alpha version for the basic design, but Pro to double check everything.

WinISD has a tone generator. I lay the cab on it's back and throw some pieces of rice on the speaker and use the tone generator to see where it stops vibrating. Not the most exact scientific way, but it gets me close enough to see where my actual(?) tuning frequency is.

I really need to get more testing equipment.
__________________
fEARful...that's about as good as it gets.
  #10  
Old 01-27-2011, 02:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by J42 View Post
This yields a displacement of 2.613 cu. ft.

There are two 3" ports.

I have calculated for 55.26 Hz, which is the Fs of the drivers.

Using an online calculator at mh-audio.nl, I came up with a port length of 2.532"
EDIT:- I just checked with Winisd and it suggested 2.56".

I wouldn't go experimenting with port tunings unless you know what you're after and what else changes when port tuning changes. Stick with 55.26Hz for now then see how the cab sounds before you decide if anything needs changing.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.

Last edited by Petebass : 01-27-2011 at 03:02 PM.
  #11  
Old 01-27-2011, 04:36 PM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
^ Thanks Pete. I have Windows 7 and have had some troubles running older software, so didn't even want to try installing it.

I used the online WinISD and got the same result. My ports were supposed to be delivered today, but we had a snow storm yesterday, so I am hoping they come tomorrow.

Thanks to all of you guys for your advice.
  #12  
Old 01-27-2011, 07:49 PM
DukeLeJeune's Avatar
only immortal for a limited time

Owner & speaker designer, AudioKinesis
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Preston, Idaho
GOLD Supporting Member
One of the things a designer juggles when it comes to the port tuning frequency is bass loudness vs protection from fartout. It really doesn't matter what the free air resonance of the driver is; that's not the target.

In my opinion 55 Hz might be a little on the high side from a fartout standpoint; it might be worthwhile lowering the tuning to 50 Hz or so.

I presume you didn't order extra ports so that you can experiment with different lengths, so here is what I suggest: Cut your holes for the port(s) a little bit bigger around than you really need, and use a few wraps of electrical tape around the port to get a good snug friction fit. This way if your ports aren't doing what you want, you can remove them and either trim them (if you feel the bass is weak AND fartout isn't an issue) or replace them with longer ports (if fartout is keeping you from getting the SPLs you need).
__________________
Full review of Thunderchild 112AF in Issue #7 of Bass Gear Magazine
primeVibe seasons your instrument for richer tone
The Thunderchild 115 is out!
  #13  
Old 01-29-2011, 04:29 PM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Duke, thanks for the advise. Am I understanding correctly that tuning the ports to a lower frequency will decrease bass output?
  #14  
Old 01-29-2011, 04:36 PM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Quote:
Originally Posted by J42 View Post
Duke, thanks for the advise. Am I understanding correctly that tuning the ports to a lower frequency will decrease bass output?
No, it won't. It will decrease the output above the frequency where you were planning on tuning it, and increase the output below that. Which you'll prefer is an unknown variable.
  #15  
Old 01-29-2011, 11:11 PM
DukeLeJeune's Avatar
only immortal for a limited time

Owner & speaker designer, AudioKinesis
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Preston, Idaho
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by J42 View Post
Duke, thanks for the advise. Am I understanding correctly that tuning the ports to a lower frequency will decrease bass output?
I would think the 55 Hz tuning will sound like "more bass" than the 50 Hz tuning because you'll be getting more output in the region of the first overtones of your lower notes, but as Bill pointed out you'd be getting less energy way down low with the higher tuning frequency.

Assuming your amp has plenty of headroom, the lower tuning frequency's slightly better fartout resistance would allow you to either play a bit louder, or crank in a bit of bass boost and play just as loud but your cab would go slightly deeper.
__________________
Full review of Thunderchild 112AF in Issue #7 of Bass Gear Magazine
primeVibe seasons your instrument for richer tone
The Thunderchild 115 is out!
  #16  
Old 01-30-2011, 07:18 AM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Another issue is excursion. The driver excursion is at a minimum at the box frequency. It rises drastically below Fb, and it also rises drastically above Fb. This means you can tune too low, because there's no advantage to having minimum excursion below where you need it, and you can tune too high, as you don't want excursion limits to suck away your low frequency output capability. Knowing how to balance all of the aspects of cabinet design to arrive at a desired result is only realized through years, if not decades, of actual experience.
  #17  
Old 01-30-2011, 08:41 AM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Does tuning the ports to the Fs of the drivers maximize efficiency?
  #18  
Old 01-30-2011, 09:06 AM
Registered User

Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Quote:
Originally Posted by J42 View Post
Does tuning the ports to the Fs of the drivers maximize efficiency?
No. There is no such thing as optimal tuning, as the result is different with every driver and every box size.
  #19  
Old 01-30-2011, 09:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, Connecticut, USA
You really need to consider the box dimensions AND the driver specs when tuning the overall system. You don't really tune ports, you tune the system by changing the dimensions of the ports. Do not get stuck on the idea that the system needs to be tuned to the Fs of the driver.

It was mentioned a couple of times already that unloading of the driver under system tuning is severe (I don't remember the math).

My rule of thumb is that you should not tune a bass cab higher than 50Hz and 40Hz is even better. If you cannot get a system to sound good at these tunings then it is time to consider another driver or box.
  #20  
Old 01-30-2011, 10:38 AM
J42 J42 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Thanks again guys! I am still waiting on the delivery of my ports. They are 5" long which will start me out at 40Hz. I'll see how they sound for a while, and then shorten them if I think there is room for improvement.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.