|  | 
12-06-2010, 08:38 AM
|  | Registered User Staff Reviewer- Bass Musician Magazine | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Asheville, NC | | | smallish dedicated subwoofer?
Sign in to disble this ad
I know this is a bit of an oddball question, but for a rig I'm assembling, I need a small cabinet solely for lows. I have two 112's run in stereo which sound fantastic for all but the deep sub lows. For the material and the instrumentation of this project, I need a cab that can put out those low frequencies typically associated with dedicated subwoofers, but in a manageable package (don't really want to haul an 18" speaker cab around).
What it needs to be: portable, powered (ideally), and reasonably affordable. I don't need a ton of volume or stage projection, just some nice extra bottom end on stage. Looking for something that really sounds good though, and not sure what is the best way to go, as this is kinda unfamiliar to me. Any help would be appreciated | 
12-06-2010, 09:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: Orangevale, CA 95662 | | | Need a few more answers please.
First, how low do you have to go?
Next, are you willing to biamp?
How much size/weight is acceptable?
Why do you need this onstage? No PA support?
This is a huge difference between 31 Hz and 41 Hz.
You can get way down low, but not very loud in a reasonable box.
If you need 30 Hz, you can get this from a BP102 in a good size box, but still not very loud.
...certainly not a loud 'stage volume'. | 
12-06-2010, 10:25 AM
|  | Registered User Staff Reviewer- Bass Musician Magazine | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Asheville, NC | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bgavin Need a few more answers please.
First, how low do you have to go?
Next, are you willing to biamp?
How much size/weight is acceptable?
Why do you need this onstage? No PA support?
This is a huge difference between 31 Hz and 41 Hz.
You can get way down low, but not very loud in a reasonable box.
If you need 30 Hz, you can get this from a BP102 in a good size box, but still not very loud.
...certainly not a loud 'stage volume'. | Essentially, I'm playing in a group with two other guys, acoustic and electric dobro and a world percussionist. Both of those guys have their sound very dialed in, and very full range/high fidelity. Where I am normally more than happy with the full range-ness of my tri-112's, something about the context of the band seems to want a deeper low end on my part. I don't know exactly how deep I need to get, frequency wise, and its more than likely for monitoring on stage only. I'm sure most venues would want the full range DI signal from my pre to go their system, so theoretically the box doesn't have to put out a ton of volume, but certainly it needs to kick for a small stage setup.
First, how low do you have to go? it just has to cover the B string
Next, are you willing to biamp? In my mind, I'd be looking at this chain: Preamp w/ effects in loop > 1 line to powered sub with built in crossover, 1 line to stereo QSC amp running my 1x12's.
How much size/weight is acceptable? up to 50lbs, nothing bigger than a small 1x15 sized enclosure
Why do you need this onstage? I don't want to get all those lows from the tri112's (they can do it if EQ'd properly, but I would prefer to biamp my sound and separate the lows from the full range stereo effected signal).
thanks | 
12-06-2010, 10:35 AM
|  | http://greenboy.us/forum/ greenboy designs: fEARful, bassic, dually, crazy88 etc | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: remote mountain cabin Montana | | | See sig | 
12-06-2010, 10:39 AM
| | Registered User Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: New Hampshire | | | Hoffman's Iron Law: To extend response 1 octave lower with equal sensitivity requires making the cabinet volume eight times larger. One can get around this to some extent by accepting lower sensitivity, but that means using a lot more power, and having a driver that can handle that power. In short, a small cabinet for lows isn't practical. At the very least it would have to be as large as your current two cabs combined. | 
12-06-2010, 10:50 AM
|  | Registered User Staff Reviewer- Bass Musician Magazine | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Asheville, NC | | | those look cool, wonder if I could get away with eq'ing and powering one of those with my extra LMII, and get subwoofer-ish results | 
12-06-2010, 10:59 AM
|  | Smile more, ok? Staff Reviewer; Bass Gear Magazine Moderator | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Columbia MO | | | you need a fearful 12 sub. yep.
see greenboys sig line.
__________________ F/S: Sadowsky Portabag and Mooradian single gig bag; Epi UL410S2 | 
12-06-2010, 11:00 AM
|  | Registered User Staff Reviewer- Bass Musician Magazine | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Asheville, NC | | Quote:
Originally Posted by billfitzmaurice Hoffman's Iron Law: To extend response 1 octave lower with equal sensitivity requires making the cabinet volume eight times larger. One can get around this to some extent by accepting lower sensitivity, but that means using a lot more power, and having a driver that can handle that power. In short, a small cabinet for lows isn't practical. At the very least it would have to be as large as your current two cabs combined. | I hear you. the only thing that makes me think its reasonably do-able is the fact that I don't need it to push a ton of volume. | 
12-06-2010, 11:07 AM
|  | Registered User Staff Reviewer- Bass Musician Magazine | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Asheville, NC | | | could a LMII > 12/6 do the job? | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |