Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergerac (not by EQ'ing I hope you meant)
can this be achieved by cab-design? If yes, how? |
The only practical ways I know of to suppresse that 1.2 kHz peak are by EQ'ing or by aggressive roll-off via a crossover. Cab design doesn't address that sort of issue, unless you design a bandpass bass enclosure... which I don't think would work well for this application.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergerac how low do you think can I go? approx. which tuning-freq? |
Using the latest published data on the 3015LF (similar to what you posted, except for Fs = 43.65 Hz), assuming a 5 cubic foot internal volume:
With a sealed box, you'd have no upper bass bumpage and an F3 of about 67 Hz, along with the typical roughly 12 dB per octave rolloff below that (Qtc = .66 ballpark).
With "normal" tuning, say 45 Hz ballpark, you'd get a broad +1 dB plateau from 100 Hz down to 60 Hz, and a -3 dB point around 44 Hz.
With a "sealed-box simulation" low tuning of 34 Hz you'd have no upper bass bumpage, -3 dB at about 48 Hz, and a 12 dB per octave initial rolloff. So your response curve looks (and sounds) a lot like a sealed box, but you get almost 1/2 octave deeper extension than with the actual sealed box.
In many cases the low-tuned approach sacrifices too much excursion-limited power handling relative to "normal" tuning to be a viable alternative, but the 3015LF has such high x-max that in my opinion you can get away with it. The hard part may be shoe-horning long enough ports into the box.
I'm not specifically recommending 5 cubic feet nor any particular tuning frequency, just giving an example.