|  | | 
04-22-2011, 01:23 AM
| | | | Swr..?
Sign in to disble this ad
Hey dudes, I'm looking for my first legit solid state head, and Swr is a company ive really over looked. I know mike Gordon used to use them, but has since switches to Eden. You guys know much about them as far as models, tone, versatility..? Thanks bros in advance
__________________
El Sobrante # 1
| 
04-22-2011, 01:31 AM
|  | that video LIES | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Northern California | | http://www.talkbass.com/forum/search...archid=7077413
Personally, I love the looks of SWR but their mid-scooped tone is the absolute opposite of *my sound*, and I've always found them to be rather underpowered for their stated rating. Try them, though- I'm not normal. 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Albert He who throws mud only loses ground. | | 
04-22-2011, 01:37 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | | swr makes nice stuff. not as up on their current models, but i used to own an sm-500 and played sm-900's occasionally. they tend to be midscooped if you set them flat but you can eq it out on most of them if it's not your thing. these days there's stuff i like better, but they still make a nice amp.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
04-22-2011, 04:25 AM
|  | Supporting Member | | | | | Years ago my friend and I both owned SWR Basic Black combos (he got his on my recommendation). We both had reliability issues with the amp section and after several attempts to repair eventually gave up.
I haven't heard many negative comments about SWR reliability so I assume we were just two unlucky folks. Too bad, it was a really great combo - it would have been among my all time favorites if it weren't for the issues.
EDIT: I should add that my friend (bravely) moved on to a SWR Workingman's 15 and never had a single issue with it over hundreds of gigs.
__________________ Rob Allen -> Acoustic Image
Last edited by JxBass : 04-22-2011 at 04:28 AM.
| 
04-22-2011, 04:31 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: near the big SWR amp | | | My RedHead certainly contributed to my perception of SWR gear being underpowered.
I bought an SWR Stereo 800 power amp and lived happily ever after.
It's true, when Eden came out, most SWR users jumped on the Eden bandwagon.
I still liked my 2x Goliath IIs and my ears could never really justify the cost of switching.
Now there is clearly a pre-Fender and post-Fender SWR mystique... I would suggest shopping around and let your ears be the judge?
Happy shopping...
__________________
To each his or her own... variety is the spice of life.
"If it feels nice, don't think twice" (James Taylor)
I am neither Jaco nor James Jamerson (and neither of them could have been a better me.)
| 
04-22-2011, 04:40 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Ohio | | | Ive used an SWR SM500 for a while. When I played it through an Ampeg 8x10 it was less than impressive. After ditching that cab and going with a Mesa Boogies Diesel 4x10, I couldnt ask for anymore. The amp has a tube driver wich lets it get pretty gnarly and the EQ is simple. I love the tone. Plenty of lows, plenty of power, and have had no reliability issues. The only complaint I could have is sometimes the fan is loud enough I can hear it on stage. It may just not be able to cool off enough in my rack. You can find good deals on these too. I would reccomend one to anyone. The newer SWRs, I have only played through the 350 and I personally didnt like it. When you cant get a good sound with a Spector Euro says alot to me!!??
__________________
LOWDOWN
| 
04-22-2011, 04:58 AM
|  | Registered User | | | | | Love most of their cabs except for the cheaper stuff, don't care much for their heads...
- georgestrings | 
04-22-2011, 05:05 AM
|  | Bartle doo? | | Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Missing Mountains | | I've played exclusively through SWR for the last 10 years. Love their stuff. However, I've decided its time to try something new. My SM-500 head has lasted me the entire time with no issues what so ever. It's true, the higher quality line is good, the budget line is... meh... The company is love or hate for most people. My long love isn't over, I'm just looking for a gear affair 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by YCBass Fortunately the smell is only there when you actually put your face close to the holes, otherwise you wouldn't notice it in playing position... |
Fuzzrocious #2 / B1S #2 / S.A.S.S. #15 / WA #37
| 
04-22-2011, 05:39 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: alberta canada | | | I love the SWR headlite. Besides its portability you can defeat the aural enhancer for a nice warm unscooped sound. I dont believe you can totally defeat it on other models. | 
04-22-2011, 08:11 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Cayce, SC | | | The only negative thing I can say about my early 90s model Workingman's 12 is that the pots became scratchy after awhile (like ten years or more). Dust, I presume. It's never had a cover, so...
__________________
2001 American Series Jazz Bass / 1987 Jazz Bass Special
Markbass Little Mark III / dual 151P cabs / 121H combo
| 
04-22-2011, 08:59 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: new yawk | | | great cabs....i own goliath I and II, henry jr 4x8, Henry 8x8, 6x10
my Bassic Black holding up well, i've beat its brains out.
__________________
Lefty Union Member #42
SWR Fan Club Member #25
| 
04-22-2011, 09:03 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Tampa, Florida | | | I've been rocking my SWR Bass 750 now for 2 years with a 2 ohm load and has yet to fail me. It surpassed my peavey T-Maxx head in the tone I was wanting. It is on the heavy side with it not being a tube amp though. | 
04-22-2011, 09:09 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Sioux Falls, SD | | | Stay away from the WorkingPro heads. Icky, clacky sterile sound and distressingly little volume for the advertised wattage. Easily the most regretted purchase of my musical career.
Last edited by jaywa : 04-22-2011 at 09:15 AM.
| 
04-22-2011, 09:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Jacksonville, FL | | | SWR is good bang for your buck, mainly because they don't carry the same resell value as an Ampeg or other more highly sought after brands.
That being said, I owned several of them and never really settled in on any of them having the sound I really wanted. I've had 2 heads that haven't made me want something else, out of the dozen or so I've had in about 6 years.
__________________
I hate T40s. #38 Bassists w/ Beards Club
#113 Florida Bassists Club
sXe Bassist Club #5 | 
04-22-2011, 09:59 AM
| | | | Well this is all very interesting, where would you guys rate them against GK?
__________________
El Sobrante # 1
| 
04-22-2011, 10:10 AM
|  | that video LIES | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Northern California | | I've never had a reliability issue w/the couple of SWR maps I've owned, or the few I've played fairly regularly; same goes for GK. SWR- again- IME is underpowered & the general tone is not my cup of tea; GK is(IMO)the absolute opposite(VERY loud for stated wattage, very pleasing tonally- admittedly a matter of opinion  ).
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Albert He who throws mud only loses ground. | | 
04-22-2011, 10:22 AM
|  | a/k/a Steve Cooper | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Huntington WV | | | I've owned an LA-15 combo for several years. It works well as a practice amp; no reliability problems. It has a rounder, less scooped sound than a Redhead I've rung out pretty thoroughly at my local music store.
IMO the smart move is to audition whatever amps you can, and take some time getting clarity about your tone goals. Every brand has its signature sound--and when you get into combinations of cabs and heads, you're looking for them to complement each other.
(Quick example: my pair of Aggie GS-112 cabs work nicely with my Markbass F1 head, because the warmth of the head fills a mild mid-scoop the cabs have. But I don't particularly care for that same amp with my 2-10 EA cab, which has the reputation of being flat, almost like a studio monitor.) | 
04-22-2011, 10:34 AM
| | | | Underpowered indeed Bassteban. The MoBass head I owned for a few months was a complete disappointment. The bridged output sounded nowhere near 900 watts.
On top of that the face was just too busy with knobs, and the preamp controls were stratchy. I only really used 2 effects out the 6 or so that were on the head, I could get them to sound ok but footswitching them mention that I had to buy that behemoth floor board to use only two effects.
On the plus side a friend of mine who has been playing for about 10 years swears by his Triad cab.
__________________
BASS-Fender, AMP-Eden
| 
04-22-2011, 10:41 AM
| | | | I've got a Basic Black, no issues with this one (great sounding amp).
If you buy an SWR used (they are very affordable), chances are you can play it for quite a while and not lose any money on it. | 
04-22-2011, 10:42 AM
|  | poppin in the corn belt | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: A tank of gas from Chicago | | | I played SWR for years and felt they were underpowered too, but I liked their EQ features. In general I think they are pretty reliable. I definitely liked all my SWR gear better than any Eden or GK stuff I owned or played.
More than power being an issue, I felt it was more of a headroom issue.
Try one and put it through it's paces. I was a big fan of the triad and henry 8x8 cabs. except the drivers always crapped out in the 8x8. Also had a great Baby Blue combo and 12 combo that rocked. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |