Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-29-2010, 12:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
SWR Aural Enhancer Bypass

Sign in to disble this ad
Has anyone modified their older SWR amp to bypass the aural enhancer circuit and achieve a flat frequency repsonse?

Specifically, I'd like to replace the original aural enhancer knob with a pull pot on my SM-400 so that I can have access to the original and modified preamp voicings.

Is this possible? If it is, where should the switch be positioned in the circuit below?



Thanks,
Duff2
  #2  
Old 03-29-2010, 12:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Subscribed!
__________________
Mike


http://www.facebook.com/pages/Safe-f...555132?ref=sgm
Mediocre Bassist Club member #199
  #3  
Old 03-29-2010, 12:34 PM
aBoMoFo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Supporting Member
Good idea for a neat mod. Taking a quick look at that schematic, I don't see a quick and easy way to do it. One physical limitation to using the push/pull pot MIGHT be the actual space alloted for it within the casing of the 400.

If you get the mod done though I'd love to see it and hear your thoughts on the results.

[edit in the line talking about "push/pull pot WOULD be the..." I intended to say "push/pull pot MIGHT be the..."]

Last edited by aBoMoFo : 04-06-2010 at 11:29 PM. Reason: grammar
  #4  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
For those who are interested, I have also posted this thread here:

http://music-electronics-forum.com/t18931/

No responses yet, but I'm still hopeful.

Cheers,
Duff2
  #5  
Old 04-01-2010, 08:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Turn it all the way down?
  #6  
Old 04-01-2010, 09:20 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: California
"Flat frequency response" is much more an issue of remedying the tone stack on SWR amps, which are notoriously scooped, not the "Aural Enhancer."
__________________
"There's no helping nor educating a fool." -- My percipient grandfather
  #7  
Old 04-01-2010, 09:32 AM
Registered User

Director - Barefaced Ltd
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brighton, UK
With my old SWR GP the closest to flat response was with the aural enhancer off and everything flat apart from the lower mid semi-parametric EQ which had an 8dB boost at 250Hz. I also found the the aural enhancer did was just a simple boost for the first third of its rotation, after which it added yet more cut at 250Hz. If the SM400 is similar I'd try that first.
  #8  
Old 04-06-2010, 03:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Here's how it's done folks (well everything except the push/pull addition that is).



In text format:
1. remove the 0.1 uF capacitor
2. Use it to replace the 0.001 uF capacitor

This most awesome modification will apparently flatten the preamp voicing and leave the added gain available by turning up the aural enhancer knob intact.

Thanks to kringle77 and Walter Harley (of Cafe Walter headphone amp fame) for all their help in this matter.

I am planning on taking my amp to a tech later this week. I'll let you know how the mod turns out.

Cheers,
Duff2
  #9  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:20 PM
Fuzzbass's Avatar
Fingers, pick, and a little bit of slap
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Terrapin country (Crofton, MD)
Supporting Member
Thumbs up

Wow. Very cool!
  #10  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongolation View Post
"Flat frequency response" is much more an issue of remedying the tone stack on SWR amps, which are notoriously scooped, not the "Aural Enhancer."
+1

And if you dial that "Aural Enhancer" all the way down, are you not removing it from the chain?
  #11  
Old 04-06-2010, 07:49 PM
FuzzBoxVoodoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sacramento CA
Supporting Member
I have a SWR Grand Prix Pre that has this mod and I highly recommend it,the sound is more usable in a live setting.
It is good to see how it was done now.
__________________
Aguilar Club #104
Trace Elliot #137
Genz Benz 146
Big Cabs Club #3
www.beyondreasonband.com
www.Strongholdband.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by notforrobots View Post
But as im getting older my stuff is getting smaller.

Last edited by FuzzBoxVoodoo : 04-06-2010 at 07:52 PM.
  #12  
Old 04-06-2010, 09:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigOldHarry View Post
+1

And if you dial that "Aural Enhancer" all the way down, are you not removing it from the chain?
Not exactly, the mid-scoop is present even with the aural enhancer set to zero (unlike the Enhance control on the Eden and Thunderfunk amps). Up to a 2 O'clock setting the SWR aural enhancer controls how much additional signal from your bass passes through the second half of the 12AX7 tube. This adds gain and extra high end harmonic coloration to your sound but does not change the preset EQ curve present when the control is in the off position. At settings beyond 2 O'clock there's no extra gain, but rather an additional mid scoop added around 200 Hz.

Graphically, here's what the aural enhancer control does on an SWR amp:



Cheers,
Duff2

Last edited by duff2 : 04-06-2010 at 09:33 PM.
  #13  
Old 04-06-2010, 10:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Quote:
Originally Posted by duff2 View Post
Not exactly, the mid-scoop is present even with the aural enhancer set to zero (unlike the Enhance control on the Eden and Thunderfunk amps). Up to a 2 O'clock setting the SWR aural enhancer controls how much additional signal from your bass passes through the second half of the 12AX7 tube. This adds gain and extra high end harmonic coloration to your sound but does not change the preset EQ curve present when the control is in the off position. At settings beyond 2 O'clock there's no extra gain, but rather an additional mid scoop added around 200 Hz.

Graphically, here's what the aural enhancer control does on an SWR amp:



Cheers,
Duff2
Hey duff2,

Do you have any data for aural enhancer at lower setting , such as 8, 10 o'clock???

Thanks.
__________________
Happiness is a warm gun!
  #14  
Old 04-06-2010, 11:16 PM
aBoMoFo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Supporting Member
Very cool! I'm anxiously awaiting the results and your thoughts. Looking at this mod and my mouth is watering.

I took a look through a few resources and it looks like the Aural Enhancer pot is a 50K for your SM400 (http://www.musicpartsguru.com/closeu...=911&offset=10)

If you wanted one with a pull switch for defeat then this might be the fella for you.
http://www.musicpartsguru.com/closeu...=915&offset=10

Now I can't be dead certain that this is the right pot but a quick call to the parts retailer would confirm the fact that the one with the switch is the same as the non switch version. (i.e. Log vs. Linear)

It also looks like SWR used 50K pots all over the place on their front panel controls. Those of you with "aural enhancers" in the 750X, 550X, Super Redhead, Black Beauty, Workingman Series, Cali Blonde, Strawberry Blonde, Studio 220, Bass 350, Silverado, Redhead, Baby Blue II, Basic Black, SM-900, SM-500, and Grand Prix units might be able to use this 50K w/ switch for the original 50K pot that your units came with.
  #15  
Old 04-06-2010, 11:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brookfield, CT
I am dying to do this mod to my old SM900. But how do I find the physical location of the two caps?
  #16  
Old 04-07-2010, 06:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Nice work Duff; just assumed that when the knob was turned down it was out of the circuit; await you report back regarding performance
  #17  
Old 04-07-2010, 06:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhduffl View Post
Hey duff2,

Do you have any data for aural enhancer at lower setting , such as 8, 10 o'clock???

Thanks.
It would look the same as the black curve but it be located between the black and green curves. Soundwise, the volume would increase slightly and the top end will have more sparkle added to it.

Cheers,
Duff2
  #18  
Old 04-07-2010, 08:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Quote:
Originally Posted by duff2 View Post
It would look the same as the black curve but it be located between the black and green curves. Soundwise, the volume would increase slightly and the top end will have more sparkle added to it.

Cheers,
Duff2
+2..

Thank you so much Duff2....

Cheers,
Man-Ho
__________________
Happiness is a warm gun!
  #19  
Old 04-07-2010, 08:22 PM
jb63's Avatar
I try not to think...it hurts my head.
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Supporting Member
Subscribed!



This completely addresses my only gripe with the SM400, that mid scoop right in the meat and potatoes frequencies. I'm thinking about doing this mod even though my SM has been sidelined in favor of an LMII.
  #20  
Old 04-07-2010, 08:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cape Fear!
I take it that this is applicable to the WorkingPro 400?
__________________
Praise and Worship #623
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.