Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-31-2010, 11:10 AM
lomo's Avatar
passionate hack
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec
GOLD Supporting Member
Thought xpmnt: which will be louder?

Sign in to disble this ad
A thought experiment for the physics herd, since I no longer have a head that pushes 500w into 8 Ohms to test it empirically myself.

Which rig will be louder:

LDS 15/6 (fEarful type with long throw 15 and 18Sound midrange) and 500 watts

or

LDS 15/6 and Mesa PH112 with 300 watts into the 4 Ohm stack?
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P

Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
  #2  
Old 07-31-2010, 08:08 PM
lomo's Avatar
passionate hack
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec
GOLD Supporting Member
anyone ?
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P

Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
  #3  
Old 07-31-2010, 08:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Send a message via AIM to Sartori
The fEarful designs, from what I've read, are basically made to sound really awesome by themselves or with an additional unit of the same type (say, two 15/6 cabs). Pairing it up with a Mesa 112 might introduce phase issues and mess with the balanced sound of the 15/6, which seems to somewhat defeat the purpose of using one.

As for which setup would actually be louder, I have no idea. Also, that's just my speculation on the matter, and I'm no expert about anything, so take with a grain of salt. Bill or Greenboy would obviously have more knowledgeable opinions on the matter.
__________________
Anime-ted Bass Players Group member #5. Mediocre Bassist Club member #316. 15" Club member #8. Metal Bassist Club Member #27
  #4  
Old 07-31-2010, 08:37 PM
lomo's Avatar
passionate hack
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec
GOLD Supporting Member
I realize the PH112 is a poor sonic choice to top the 15-6, which would pair best with another of the same cab, but I'm curious about the overall volume comparison between the 2 rigs. A 15-6 with a bigger amp is an easier haul than the 15-6 with another 45 lb cab and a small head.
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P

Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
  #5  
Old 07-31-2010, 10:35 PM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
instead of a 15/6 and a 212, add a second fearful 15 with no mid cone on bottom. or get it with a mid cone but make it able to turn off for when you have the two cabs.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #6  
Old 07-31-2010, 11:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by lomo View Post
A thought experiment for the physics herd, since I no longer have a head that pushes 500w into 8 Ohms to test it empirically myself.

Which rig will be louder:

LDS 15/6 (fEarful type with long throw 15 and 18Sound midrange) and 500 watts

or

LDS 15/6 and Mesa PH112 with 300 watts into the 4 Ohm stack?
If you're after a raw mathematical answer, we'll also need to know the sensitivity spec of each cab.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
  #7  
Old 08-01-2010, 12:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas
The Fearful alone will be louder. A 500 watt amp will give up way before it will.
  #8  
Old 08-01-2010, 01:32 AM
rpsands's Avatar
Less Ebay, more Mel Bay
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Supporting Member
Like I said in the other thread the pair of them will be more sensitive, but you risk doing serious damage to the 12 -- it's not as sensitive as the 15, and has 1/4 or less the excursion limited power handling. Chances are good you would not hear it bottoming out and damaging the speaker.

With 300 watts total into 4 ohms, it won't be appreciably louder.

My experience with the PH112 suggests its sensitivity is around 95db, average, but that's a ballpark estimate.
__________________
Dingwall ABZ 5
Lots of pedals
Markbass SD1200 -> fEarful 1515/66 (or TC115N)
Red Complex
  #9  
Old 08-01-2010, 02:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Send a message via AIM to Sartori
That's true, the PH112 might actually constrain volume in that it will bottom out before you can get everything out of the amp, depending on EQ. It says it handles 300 watts, but over-excursion might hurt it before then.
__________________
Anime-ted Bass Players Group member #5. Mediocre Bassist Club member #316. 15" Club member #8. Metal Bassist Club Member #27
  #10  
Old 08-01-2010, 07:07 AM
lomo's Avatar
passionate hack
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Malone, NY/ Montreal, Quebec
GOLD Supporting Member
Thanks.
__________________
a few of my heros: David Suzuki, Jean Beliveau, Galileo, Richard Dawkins, Louis Pasteur, Niels-Henning O-P

Crappy Bassist with Expensive Gear Club member 156
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.