|  | | 
06-25-2011, 12:07 AM
|  | KEED SPILLS..no, wait..PILL SKEEDS..SKILL PEEDS? | | Join Date: May 2011 Location: Nashville, Cats | | | TUBES, TUBES, TUBES
Sign in to disble this ad
Hi, guys;
i am sorry if this question has been asked before, but I have not seen it.
what is the difference between 6550 power tubes and KT-88's?
are KT-88's just super 6550's? are they interchangeable?
ampeg uses 6550's as its power tube but i believe marshall and eden use kt-88's (correct me if i am wrong)
is there any more difficulty in getting replacements for one than the other?
also, does anyone have experience with the eden wtb-300 amp? i believe it has independent bias adjustments for each tube on it's back panel. is this true and how does it work? I am intrigued by this amp, because the cost is significantly less than either the ampeg heritage or the marshall vba-400.
i would appreciate any input from someone who has used one.
thanks,
/s/ Dave
__________________ any time, any place...any song, any bass Quote: |
"it is depressing to think that by the time he was my age, Mozart had been dead fifteen years" --Tom Lehrer
|
Last edited by Lonesomedave : 06-25-2011 at 12:12 AM.
| 
06-25-2011, 12:11 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | |
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
06-25-2011, 12:28 AM
|  | KEED SPILLS..no, wait..PILL SKEEDS..SKILL PEEDS? | | Join Date: May 2011 Location: Nashville, Cats | | | thanks, JimmyM;
from what I read on the site (and again, please, please correct me if i am wrong), any amp designed to run 6550's can safely run KT-88's, r..i..g..h..t?
/s/ Dave
__________________ any time, any place...any song, any bass Quote: |
"it is depressing to think that by the time he was my age, Mozart had been dead fifteen years" --Tom Lehrer
| | 
06-25-2011, 12:38 AM
|  | vintage bass nut John K Custom Basses | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Thousand Oaks, CA | | | pretty much every one that i've seen. and BTW, marshall used 6550's in their 50 and 100 watt models that were sold in the USA. they used EL34's for the british versions, and KT88's in the marshall majors (200 watt).. | 
06-25-2011, 02:03 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Bristol, UK | | KT88s draw a little more current and some Ampegs apparently don't deal well with that. They can also take higher plate voltage, which is only really relevant if your amp provides it. They are cleaner in an amp designed around them, but actual lack of distortion isn't generally what you are after if you run valve amps (clean like a PA, rather than clean set valve amp).
Edit: Data sheets here: http://www.drtube.com/tubedata.htm
__________________
myspace.com/caricaturesband
ampstack.wordpress.com
Last edited by Mr. Foxen : 06-25-2011 at 02:11 AM.
| 
06-25-2011, 07:09 AM
|  | bassist for staind | | | | here is more info. Ampeg SVT 300W biasing - AMPAGE Archive i switched to kt88 in a mcintosh amplifier, didnt have to rebias, but ampegs may be different. why were you looking to switch? changing power tubes wont have as much sonic effect as changing preamp tubes. i switched simply because i am snobby and wanted the best tubes even if it only made a tiny tiny difference. vintage metal based gec gold lions. | 
06-25-2011, 07:21 AM
|  | mercenary mathematician | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Philadelphia | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesomedave Hi, guys;
what is the difference between 6550 power tubes and KT-88's?
| In my limited experience, 6550's sound awesome in my SVT while KT88's sound super awesome. | 
06-25-2011, 07:25 AM
|  | bassist for staind | | | | is that true kander? i didnt think most people would be able to tell. good news. bad news is i only have 4 and cant try them in my svt  | 
06-25-2011, 07:30 AM
|  | bassist for staind | | | | kt88 eye candy  | 
06-25-2011, 07:42 AM
|  | mercenary mathematician | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Philadelphia | | Quote:
Originally Posted by staindbass is that true kander? i didnt think most people would be able to tell. good news. bad news is i only have 4 and cant try them in my svt  | Probably not, but I need to convince myself after I spent some $$$ when it came time to retube  | 
06-25-2011, 09:07 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by staindbass kt88 eye candy  | Wow, bet that's a hell of a "micro" rig 
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
06-25-2011, 09:10 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: KY USA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesomedave what is the difference between 6550 power tubes and KT-88's? | KT88s are cleaner sounding (more headroom) and draw a little bit more current compared to 6550s. The tone character of 6550s is a bit more fuzzy when the power section is overdriven. KT88s are more clear and articulate when overdriven. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesomedave are KT-88's just super 6550's? | I wouldn't characterize them that way. The two types are contructed differently. GE 6550A tubes are...uh.... "super" 6550s. KT120 tubes are super KT88s. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonesomedave are they interchangeable? | Yes in some amps, but no not all. The power transformer in some amps will handle 6550s, but not the extra draw of KT88s. Any amp with KT88s should be able to use 6550s though. The bias needs to be adjusted appropriately swapping from 6550s to KT88s or vice versa.
I don't have any experience with the Eden WTB300V amp. KT88s are the stock power tubes, so one should be able to use 6550s as well...after a bias adjustment. Quote: |
Originally Posted by staindbass i didnt think most people would be able to tell. | At loud volume with the power section pushed hard, you would definitely notice the tonal difference between KT88 and 6550s. Trust me.
Last edited by AwkwardLoudness : 06-25-2011 at 09:13 AM.
| 
06-25-2011, 09:35 AM
|  | The "G" is for Gustav | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Maryland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by staindbass kt88 eye candy  | Holy crap that is nice! | 
06-25-2011, 09:39 AM
|  | bassist for staind | | | | Quote:
Originally Posted by kander Probably not, but I need to convince myself after I spent some $$$ when it came time to retube  | good answer. opinions are great but there is nothing like finding out for yourself. | 
06-25-2011, 09:44 AM
|  | bassist for staind | | | | here is the whole micro rig  yes i hear the ge 6550a are something special. i would go for those first. at worst you could resell them for the same price you paid. | 
06-25-2011, 10:04 AM
|  | **** | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: west coast | | | My ears are NOT that great(in an audiophile kind of way) and I don't play my tube amps too often. Even so I find that in my Sunn the original Genalex KT-88's sound better than the modern replacements I've tried, I didn't think I would be able to hear/feel a difference but it's there.
__________________ It is through creating, not possessing, that live is revealed.
RIP Jimmy
| 
06-25-2011, 10:27 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by AwkwardLoudness KT88s are cleaner sounding (more headroom) and draw a little bit more current compared to 6550s.... The power transformer in some amps will handle 6550s, but not the extra draw of KT88s. Any amp with KT88s should be able to use 6550s though. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Foxen KT88s draw a little more current and some Ampegs apparently don't deal well with that. They can also take higher plate voltage, which is only really relevant if your amp provides it. | It sound to me like the answer is really "maybe" and "it depends." An amp designed for KT88s could have too high a plate voltage for 6550s. An amp designed for 6550s might strain to provide enough current for KT88s.
All things considered, I would expect it to be safer to substitute KT88s for 6550s. Run the amp under load and check for transformers overheating, you should be able to notice this before it would do any damage. Going the other way and putting too much voltage on 6550s seems like it would be more likely to cause a sudden, catastrophic failure that would cause expensive damage. | 
06-25-2011, 10:30 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: georgia....georgia........geor | | | Useless info:
The KT family of tubes were British-designed "Kinkless Transition" versions of the usual beam power tubes and pentodes - 6L6GC, EL34, and 6550. The KT66, KT77, and KT88's were all supposed to be improved versions of their respective tube.
Chris
__________________
Everybody stand back. I'm an Electrical Engineer. I'll take care of this.....
| 
06-25-2011, 10:49 AM
|  | The "G" is for Gustav | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Maryland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by rickdog
It sound to me like the answer is really "maybe" and "it depends." An amp designed for KT88s could have too high a plate voltage for 6550s. An amp designed for 6550s might strain to provide enough current for KT88s.
All things considered, I would expect it to be safer to substitute KT88s for 6550s. Run the amp under load and check for transformers overheating, you should be able to notice this before it would do any damage. Going the other way and putting too much voltage on 6550s seems like it would be more likely to cause a sudden, catastrophic failure that would cause expensive damage. | It's the screen voltage, not the plate voltage you need to watch. KT88s are rated for 600, 6550s for 450. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |