|  | | 
09-15-2010, 02:18 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Sacramento, Ca | | | what does the term "Pro Gear" mean to you?
Sign in to disble this ad
I searched the threads, but didn't find much, sorry if im repeating...
In regards to responding to Bass player adds on Craigslist, at what level does gear become suitable to be called "Pro Gear"
Is this totally subjective or is there a general consensus on a quality cuttof for pro-gear?
Obviously a 25watt practice amp and bass with two strings is short of pro, but would a band scoff at a Squier bass or a Peavey or crate head?
I have a decent bass, (Schecter, neck thru, EMGhz) and a Peavey Mark III thru fender 410 and SWR SOB 15", and I am a bit hesitant on responding to these "Must Have Pro Gear" adds. Are these guys just looking for something powerful enough to fit in the mix, or are they looking for tricked out ricks thru orange and mesa stacks?
thanks! | 
09-15-2010, 02:19 PM
|  | Registered User Alloy Musical Products | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Northern NJ | | Gear played by a pro  | 
09-15-2010, 02:23 PM
| | | | McCartney has said he does not care about the cost of the equipment, in other words paying $12000 for a guitar compared to $1000. Says it is about how it sounds to him, so my question to those people would be "is his gear not pro"? | 
09-15-2010, 02:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: California | | | Its purely subjective, and even then it still doesnt mean much. If I had to define pro gear it would be gear that gets the job done(whatever that may be). If any band passes on you based soley on your gear, then you shouldnt want to play with them anyway.
__________________ Quote: |
"Bad Decisions make Great Stories"- Anonymous
| Ibanez Club #656, Acoustic Club #242, Epiphone Thunderbird Club #135
| 
09-15-2010, 02:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Detroit | | | Unfortunately most guitards are not aware that "pro" in bass terms isn't always Fender and Ampeg.
That said - a lot of gear that has previously been thought of as "beginner" has come a long way. Many people who play Sadowskys and Laklands and blahblahblah on this board also acknowledge that for the price, a Squier sounds pretty great and would be more than adequate for 95% of players.
Peavey is definitely pro gear, and although Crate has a poor reputation, I wouldn't judge until hearing someones set up.
__________________
2005 Fender AV '62 Precision - Peavey VB-2
| 
09-15-2010, 02:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Hamburg, Germany | | Pro gear means having a Fender P and an Ampeg fridge.
Anything else just won't cut it.
(Damn, been beaten to it...)
__________________
Flatwound Club Member #0112358 //// Yorkville/Traynor Club Member #125 //// 15" Club Member #24
| 
09-15-2010, 02:30 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Frederick, Maryland | | | Pro Gear - Sufficient gear to allow bass to be audible in it's respective live setting.
__________________
11 ov 25. We are Mothman.
I put the POWER in powerpop.
| 
09-15-2010, 02:31 PM
|  | Domo Arigato, Listen to Nagato. Records of Existence/PyrE owner | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: wes virginny | | | as in all things, itll mean different things to different people..
to some, your gear is totally fine, others would scoff unless youre running an SVT into an 810, or running a full Aguilar setup.
but to me, it means that it has the power and dependability to hang with the band situation you are in. Also, "pro gear" to me denotes 'pro attitude' that you CARE about the quality of your gear, you care about the quality of your tone and that you listen to what you play and how it fits with your other musicians tones. It also means that you care about your music and have respect for what you do...
you dont have to spend $3000 for that.
__________________
24 ov 25. We Are Mothman.
| 
09-15-2010, 02:31 PM
| | | | I went to a show at a local club one night and saw this great band where the bass player was playing a clapped out low-end Ibanez through a combo that looked like he picked it up from Daddy's Junky Music for $50. This guy's whole setup probably cost less that $400 but he was sick and it sounded great.
The next band came up and the bass player had an Ampeg tube head of some kind with a fridge and, although he was decent too, the other guy just seemed so much more impressive for having made his cheap setup sound so good.
If you can sound good and play well it shouldn't matter too much unless there is an image component to what "pro" means. | 
09-15-2010, 02:35 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Lisbon, Portugal | | | Pro gear means extra charging for something that isn't really a feature. at least for me...
__________________
treble pierces your ears, but bass pounds and crushes all the way through your chest!
myspace.com/starvedband
| 
09-15-2010, 02:35 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Denver, CO | | Quote:
Originally Posted by MRDOOM Its purely subjective, and even then it still doesnt mean much. If I had to define pro gear it would be gear that gets the job done(whatever that may be). If any band passes on you based soley on your gear, then you shouldnt want to play with them anyway. | I slightly disagree with this, but think we are probably on the same page, overall.
You can be the best player in the world, but a crate 25 watt amp isn't going allow your playing to be heard over a drummer. It's not wrong to want a player's gear to keep up with the rest of the band.
__________________
If you feel like singing a song
and you want other people to sing along,
Just sing what you feel
Don't let anyone say it's wrong
Colorado Club #37
| 
09-15-2010, 03:12 PM
| | | | Pro gear means stuff which costs more than my thundering stack of Craigslist finds and played by a guy who is better than me. | 
09-15-2010, 03:30 PM
|  | Stuck somewhere in the 90's | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Atlanta, GA | | | Would gear I built myself qualify as "Pro Gear"? HMMM....
I have watched one of the best local players I have ever heard blow the "pro gear" guys away with a Squier jazz bass, a ratty looking bassman 135, and an old ampeg 215 thats covered in duct tape.
Its all in who's plucking the strings, the gear is only as good as the player........... | 
09-15-2010, 03:31 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: UK, Essex | | | The term 'professional' would infer equipment with which one could make a living from, so to me that would mean gear that is well maintained/setup well, is dependable, reliable and consistently sounds great in every setting. Brand and cost has little bearing. Well, cost does to a certain extent - more expensive gear tends to be better built, ergo more reliable. But almost any bass or amp can be fettled to perform better.
As to where the line is - when something is deemed as being pro, that's up to you. If you feel you can gig weekly in all genres with just one bass and one amp without fear of failure, consistently great tone and not struggling to be heard, then I would say it's pro. If you don't trust your gear to handle the rigours of session playing and need a backup of everything, inc backup backups, then maybe it's not pro. (yes I know pros carry backups, but that's not my point)
Sadly however, if you were to make a living from playing bass, you would arguable have more success getting jobs with mainstream, high quality branded equipment such as Fender, Lakland, Ampeg, Trace Elliot etc rather than budget or even mega-expensive boutique.
__________________
Attitude II SFG; RBX-JM2; RBX4-A2; Thumb 5 BO; Corvette Std fretless; Tokai T'bird; LMII; MB 121H; Nova Dynamics; Nova Drive; BEQ-50 (x2); LS2; BSW; BBM; Pitch Black; PT Jnr.
Last edited by ga_edwards : 09-15-2010 at 03:40 PM.
| 
09-15-2010, 03:36 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Leeds, England | | | I think if someone who's making a living off the gear they use, their gear must be pro. In general, there would be a certain price which things become pro, but as always, it really depends on what sound you want. You might need a cheap, lo-fi sound.
__________________
English | Metal | Long Hair | GK 1001RB-II/Laney Nexus NX410
[insert witty quote here]
| 
09-15-2010, 03:38 PM
| | | Nothing but " PR" hype,if we're talking manufactures. | 
09-15-2010, 03:54 PM
|  | Registered User Endorser Sadowsky string, A-Designs P1,La Bella, Bee Basses,Mike Lull | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta | | | Yes, though the term "Pro gear" is subjective, in practical, realistic, and general terms it means:
1. Your rig is in excellent working condition and does not have chronic breakdown issues.
2. The sound your rig produces is consistent with what would be expected of a professional working musician, for the type of music and ENVIRONMENT you are playing.
This basically means, for example, that if you are expected to have a clear and clean sounding rig, you do not show up with a muddy rig that distorts and is underpowered.
If you are auditioning for a top symphony orchestra, you typically would not show up with a $500, plywood bass.
The brand is irrelevant. Ampeg, Aguilar, ...yes, we all know what the big boys use but a great player does not HAVE to have that brand unless the band insists upon it.
I'd also like to add, that as a pro player, I get many compliments on my tone. I am told that I am often preferred over other bass players, in part, because I have a better tone than an amateur or even other pros that I'm replacing. Tone counts and certain equipment will help you achieve a PRO level tone.
I'd also like to mention that a keyboard player who has subbed in my Top 40 band is put at the bottom of the list because he shows up with a lousy, Casio keyboard with the cheesiest sounds. His tones are embarrassing at times and we only use this guy when no one else is available. Tone counts and certain equipment will deliver that tone but a specific brand is not necessarily needed unless you are trying to impress a producer or artist who is hung up on brand names.
__________________
Sadowsky Blue Label strings
Sadowsky UV-70
MTD 535
James Tyler
Bee Basses
Lull PJ5
Music Man SR 4, Fender Am St 5 jz
Upton Lami acoustic upright
Eminence RN4 EUB
Georgia Bassist Club #56
Last edited by funkythumb : 09-15-2010 at 04:13 PM.
| 
09-15-2010, 03:56 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Oakland, CA | | Quote:
Originally Posted by ga_edwards The term 'professional' would infer equipment with which one could make a living from, so to me that would mean gear that is well maintained/setup well, is dependable, reliable and consistently sounds great in every setting. Brand and cost has little bearing. Well, cost does to a certain extent - more expensive gear tends to be better built, ergo more reliable. But almost any bass or amp can be fettled to perform better.
As to where the line is - when something is deemed as being pro, that's up to you. If you feel you can gig weekly in all genres with just one bass and one amp without fear of failure, consistently great tone and not struggling to be heard, then I would say it's pro. If you don't trust your gear to handle the rigours of session playing and need a backup of everything, inc backup backups, then maybe it's not pro. (yes I know pros carry backups, but that's not my point)
Sadly however, if you were to make a living from playing bass, you would arguable have more success getting jobs with mainstream, high quality branded equipment such as Fender, Lakland, Ampeg, Trace Elliot etc rather than budget or even mega-expensive boutique. |
Couldn't have said it any better.
Some tools are meant to be used all day, every day and some are just fine for weekend projects.
Can you get away with using cheap tools in most situations? I think you often can but, it doesn't look good to prospective employers and you're probably taking a risk.
If you're your own boss, do whatever you want but, almost everyone judges based on appearances in this business. It's worth considering this if you want to make it your business.
__________________
Flatwound Club Member #760
| 
09-15-2010, 04:02 PM
| | | | I agree with funkythumb, especially the first assertion- your gear is well maintained and in excellent working condition. Having spares/backups to get through a gig (even if the plan is just SansAmp and monitors) is also a pro consideration. Then the second part also makes sense- it must produce the quality and quantity of sound required by the gig. So for your rig, unless the drummer is insanely loud, I'd say it's pro if you've maintained it well and it's operating at peak efficiency. | 
09-15-2010, 04:04 PM
| | | | Pro gear=The tool of a pro bassist.
Functional and reliable rather than fancy in many cases I think. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |