Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-24-2010, 11:27 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Why did my speaker distort?

Sign in to disble this ad
Last Saturday, I took my UL 310 and EA 112 speakers along with my WT 550 to a gig. During some of the loud passages, when I hit the strings hard on my Mustang Bass, the 112 would sound like it was breaking up. It didn't do it when I played my Lull MV4. The UL 310 sounded fine.

The 310 is slightly higher than 5 ohms and the 12 is 4 ohms. Would the difference in ohmage with the 550 cause this or is it the bass?
  #2  
Old 05-24-2010, 11:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
Probably more bottom hitting it than it can cope with. The distortion is the speaker passing its clean excursion limit. Do you have any bass boost going on anywhere? That will do it.

It is not to do with the impedance, the 3x10 is probably capable of shifting more air, so can cope with the bass.
  #3  
Old 05-24-2010, 12:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Palm Coast, Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post
Last Saturday, I took my UL 310 and EA 112 speakers along with my WT 550 to a gig. During some of the loud passages, when I hit the strings hard on my Mustang Bass, the 112 would sound like it was breaking up. It didn't do it when I played my Lull MV4. The UL 310 sounded fine.

The 310 is slightly higher than 5 ohms and the 12 is 4 ohms. Would the difference in ohmage with the 550 cause this or is it the bass?
A: Your Mustang obviously has a hotter output signal than your Lull

B: Your 2 cabs are close in impedance. meaning they are getting about equal power sent to them.

Your 310 has 3 speakers to share it's half of the load, whereas your 112 is a single speaker taking the power.

Putting it simply, your hotter bass caused your output to overload the single 12 cab.
__________________
Life is good as a "Bottom End" dweller
Mesa Boogie Club #92 / Big Cabs Club #37
  #4  
Old 05-24-2010, 12:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Foxen View Post
Probably more bottom hitting it than it can cope with. The distortion is the speaker passing its clean excursion limit. Do you have any bass boost going on anywhere? That will do it.
I had a small boost on the bass knob. Maybe it's not a good idea to use two different speakers with an amp that cannot control the volume for each speaker?
  #5  
Old 05-24-2010, 12:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Send a message via AIM to Sartori
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post
I had a small boost on the bass knob. Maybe it's not a good idea to use two different speakers with an amp that cannot control the volume for each speaker?
Indeed.

You also might not want to boost your lows so much when playing through the 12.
__________________
Anime-ted Bass Players Group member #5. Mediocre Bassist Club member #316. 15" Club member #8. Metal Bassist Club Member #27
  #6  
Old 05-24-2010, 08:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Supporting Member
Your Lull MV4 probably isn't putting out as much fundamental or low bass frequency as your Mustang.
  #7  
Old 05-24-2010, 08:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Think of each speaker cone as a shock absorber. Both cabs are seeing a similar input, but the UL310 is sharing the load between 3 shock absorbers to the EA's one shock absorber.

In other words, the 3x10 likely has three times the available suspension travel in the speaker's movement mechanism (X-max). When the speaker runs out of suspension travel, it bottoms out and distortion is the result.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
  #8  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:21 PM
B-string's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City, Az USA
Supporting Member
Also the 12 is getting more power than the 410. 4ohm single 12 will get more feed to it than the 5(?) ohm cab.
__________________
Just call me B-String 2
GK Club #488 Big Cabs #175 Peavey Amps #92 50+ Club #44
  #9  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-string View Post
Also the 12 is getting more power than the 410. 4ohm single 12 will get more feed to it than the 5(?) ohm cab.
Yes but it's only marginal.

Lets say the 3x10 recieves 300w and the 1x12 350w. That's 100w per driver for the 310, but 350w per driver for the 1x12.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
  #10  
Old 05-24-2010, 09:50 PM
B-string's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City, Az USA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petebass View Post
Yes but it's only marginal.

Lets say the 3x10 recieves 300w and the 1x12 350w. That's 100w per driver for the 310, but 350w per driver for the 1x12.
What "but"? You are reinforcing my point (and I suspect the 310 is a 6 ohm cab). More power to less drivers is why it happened.
__________________
Just call me B-String 2
GK Club #488 Big Cabs #175 Peavey Amps #92 50+ Club #44
  #11  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:00 PM
IvanMike's Avatar
Player Characters fear me...
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Middletown CT, USA
Send a message via AIM to IvanMike
Supporting Member
well yeah the 112 is getting a tad more than the 310, 350 watts sounds about right ish - what's the 112 rated for? It has nothing to do with an impedance mismatch, just that the 112 got more juice than it wanted. I bet you can recreate this with just the amp and the 112.
  #12  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:07 PM
B-string's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City, Az USA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanMike View Post
well yeah the 112 is getting a tad more than the 310, 350 watts sounds about right ish - what's the 112 rated for? It has nothing to do with an impedance mismatch, just that the 112 got more juice than it wanted. I bet you can recreate this with just the amp and the 112.
And the total output is limited by the "weakest" link: The power handling of the 12". If both cabs were the same impedance, the multiple driver cab could receive more power before you hit the limits of the single 12".
__________________
Just call me B-String 2
GK Club #488 Big Cabs #175 Peavey Amps #92 50+ Club #44
  #13  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-string View Post
And the total output is limited by the "weakest" link: The power handling of the 12". If both cabs were the same impedance, the multiple driver cab could receive more power before you hit the limits of the single 12".
You're arriving at the right answer, but you're getting there the wrong way

The wattage difference between a 5.33ohm cab and a 4 ohm cab isn't as big as you think it is. A 5.33 ohm single 12 is impossible to obtain, and a 4 ohm 3x10 is possible but highly unlikely... you'd need 3 x 12 ohm drivers which you'd only get as an OEM order. Or you'd have to chop a NV610 in half

The more realistic solution is to replace the 1x12 with something with the same or similar impedance but with more than one driver.... to share the workload so to speak.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
  #14  
Old 05-24-2010, 10:58 PM
B-string's Avatar
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City, Az USA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petebass View Post
You're arriving at the right answer, but you're getting there the wrong way

The wattage difference between a 5.33ohm cab and a 4 ohm cab isn't as big as you think it is. A 5.33 ohm single 12 is impossible to obtain, and a 4 ohm 3x10 is possible but highly unlikely... you'd need 3 x 12 ohm drivers which you'd only get as an OEM order. Or you'd have to chop a NV610 in half

The more realistic solution is to replace the 1x12 with something with the same or similar impedance but with more than one driver.... to share the workload so to speak.
I didn't say it was possible, if the 12" was an 8 ohm driver then the 310 would take the most power. The down side is the 12" would be much harder to hear over the 310, but higher power output would be possible before the single 12" reaches it's limits. It is not an optimal combo with a single output amp.
As far as the difference, by pure numbers the 4 ohm cab will present a 25% high load than the 5.33 ohm. Of course we don't know the actual impedance curve of either cab to make any accurate estimation?
__________________
Just call me B-String 2
GK Club #488 Big Cabs #175 Peavey Amps #92 50+ Club #44
  #15  
Old 05-25-2010, 12:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-string View Post
As far as the difference, by pure numbers the 4 ohm cab will present a 25% high load than the 5.33 ohm.
If audio was a liner measurement, this would be correct. But audio is logarithmic. If you look at most amps, the power difference between a 4 ohm load and an 8 ohm load isn't double as most people would expect. It's closer to 60% or 70%. A typical 500w amp at 4 ohms puts out closer to 350 or 300w at 8 ohms, not 250w as linear math would suggest. The difference between 4 ohms and 5.33 ohms would therefore be closer to 10% than 25%.

Actually our suggestion of an 8 ohm 12" isn't a bad one! That would break the rig down to 4 drivers of 8 ohms each all sharing the power equally. Yes the 12" would be a little bit softer than it is now, but it'll still put out a similar SPL to each of the individual 10's and will therefore contribute to the overall sound, depending on driver efficiencies of course. And as you correctly point out, impedance curves also need to be considered. You'd definitely have to audition such a set up before committing to it.
__________________
Composite speaker cab enthusiast.
  #16  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Wow! I learned a whole bunch more than I thought I would about speakers. Thank you all for your comments. I'll have to be more careful how much bass I run through them if I hook both of them up.

I'm sort of disappointed that the Japanese Mustang had a hotter pickup than the Lull.
  #17  
Old 05-25-2010, 05:40 PM
johnk_10's Avatar
vintage bass nut

John K Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post

I'm sort of disappointed that the Japanese Mustang had a hotter pickup than the Lull.
i wouldn't be disappointed at all, since IMO, hotter doesn't = better.
  #18  
Old 05-26-2010, 12:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnk_10 View Post
i wouldn't be disappointed at all, since IMO, hotter doesn't = better.
I always thought that better pickups were louder so was surprised that the Fralins are not as loud as the Japanese pickups. Thanks for clarifying this.
  #19  
Old 05-26-2010, 01:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post
I always thought that better pickups were louder so was surprised that the Fralins are not as loud as the Japanese pickups. Thanks for clarifying this.
Try volume matching them and see what you think then. If you just unplug one and plug in the other, the Mustang will probably sound better to you just because of the volume jump. Often it will make you think, "Oh, that bass sounds more present and juicy" when really it's just the psychology of volume messing with you. Figure out amp volume settings that give you equal output and then let's see what you think about that Lull tone

EDIT: also, have you looked into pickup height adjustment on each bass? It makes all the difference in the world!
__________________
... IMO, IME, YMMV, FWIW...
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.