Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Amps [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:07 PM
bb03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post
Hey kringle77

Xsonics is my company. Before Schroeder, the original design of that box was from Tech SoundSystems. I endorsed that cabinet back when Fred ran the company here in the states. The CT2000 was quite cool. My design is similar but addresses I believe all the issues that cabinet had. My cabinet has dual shelf ports and I've tried to model it's overall sound to be similar to the Eden410XLT which I've used for the last 18 years and loved.
I had a Tech cab...it's what motivated me to get a Shroerder 1212R. The Schroeder was better, as the box was bigger, but still lacking just enough in the low end. If your box can get the punch of the Schroeder, with some more true lows...you'll have a winner! Your box is about the same size, but has much more port area, and being as the side speaker is "outside" the box, the volume of the enclosure is larger...could be the ticket!
  #22  
Old 01-12-2013, 06:09 AM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Thumbs up

Thanks bb03

I promise you this box HAS lows. I have a Genz Benz 212T NX2 I bought for reference. The Xsonics 212CF gets extremely close in lows and certainly as loud as the GB 212T. Hard to believe but true. Anyone wanting to come and demo is welcome.

I also have 3 Eden 410XLT's and that is somewhat the tonal pallette I have been shooting for with the Xsonics 212CF. Studio-monitorish was not my objective. In your face growl and punch was my goal. I believe I got there.

I have been gigging the Xsonics about 3 times a week for the last 3 months and I have yet to be disappointed with it and I'm frankly always amazed. The only thing similar to the Schroeder/Tech Sound knock off is the size and weight. Mine sounds nothing like it. I endorsed the Tech SoundSystems CT2000 and had 4 of them for gigging. I knew that box inside and out and took it apart way too many times. It lacked lows, sounded extremely middy, was very directional due to basically no engineered porting. All of these issues ARE solved!

I put up 2 pics for size reference. The Xsonics 212CF is on the right side of each picture with the Xsonics 210CF on top of it.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	GB compare.jpg
Views:	272
Size:	175.2 KB
ID:	310588  Click image for larger version

Name:	Eden compare.jpg
Views:	260
Size:	172.8 KB
ID:	310589  

Last edited by Ncognito : 02-13-2013 at 06:06 AM.
  #23  
Old 01-12-2013, 06:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: austin,tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post
It is compound, not isobaric. It is dual ported so it does not act isobaric. Has 2 driver output not single as if truly isobaric
Hey, thanks. I couldn't think of the proper term there.

So, yeah, both additive. The side chamber would filter some topend off the side facing driver, yes?. Not a lot, or enough to make the whole of the sound "dark" or anything, just voiced with low mids. Depending on how the tweeter integrates, maybe not all that noticable.

Neat....should sound pretty fat.
  #24  
Old 01-12-2013, 06:45 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

Nice! I'll bet a vertical stack of the cf2x12 cabs would just crush.
  #25  
Old 01-12-2013, 08:45 AM
bb03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post

I put up 2 pics for size reference. The Xsonics 212CF is on the right side of each picture with the Xsonics 210CF on top of it.
Thanks for the pics!

So, the 210CF in the pic has the side speaker mounted on the "inside"?

Could you describe the difference in sound, compared to "outside" mounting?
  #26  
Old 01-12-2013, 08:58 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

I haven't used that 212t cab but know the eden very well. Tone wise, where does your 212cf sit with those two cabs? I've read that the 212t may be in the same sound universe as the eden but without the lowmid hump. It is really a great option to have both 4 and 8 ohm versions of your cabs.
  #27  
Old 01-12-2013, 09:27 AM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb03 View Post
Thanks for the pics!

So, the 210CF in the pic has the side speaker mounted on the "inside"?

Could you describe the difference in sound, compared to "outside" mounting?
Sorry. I hadn't mounted the second driver quite yet when I took that picture. I strongly prefer the compond loading to traditional for this application. Having a speaker firing directly into a close surface produces a boxy/middy sound that I find funky. I'm guessing that is why Schroeder doesn't really offer that design except by special order. That was my chief complaint with the Tech SoundSystems CT2000. Very nasally and boxy sounding that you just couldn't EQ out.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	group of cabs.jpg
Views:	204
Size:	134.1 KB
ID:	310611  Click image for larger version

Name:	wallfull Xsonics.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	139.0 KB
ID:	310614  

Last edited by Ncognito : 02-13-2013 at 06:05 AM.
  #28  
Old 01-12-2013, 09:42 AM
bb03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post
Sorry. I hadn't mounted the second driver quite yet when I took that picture.
I thought about that being the situation AFTER I posted.
  #29  
Old 01-12-2013, 09:48 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

Love the pics. Looks like you have two different 12's and two different tweets being used.
  #30  
Old 01-12-2013, 10:18 AM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by kringle77 View Post
I haven't used that 212t cab but know the eden very well. Tone wise, where does your 212cf sit with those two cabs? I've read that the 212t may be in the same sound universe as the eden but without the lowmid hump. It is really a great option to have both 4 and 8 ohm versions of your cabs.
The GB 212T is a pretty smoking cab. Guess that's why tons of them are sold. The Xsonics 212CF is a true blend in terms of sound of the Genz Benz NX2 and an Eden 210/410XLT. Very fat and huge sounding like the GB but more agressive with punch and growl like Eden. I've spent the better part of a year in gigging trials and almost 20 prototypes later to get to where the cab is now.

I'm a 4 ohm guy, as I won't haul 2 cabinets. One 212CF WILL blow your face off. But I know many players gotta go 8 ohm for their own personal reasons. I had to get a speaker manufacturer that would do the same driver in 8 and 16 ohms.

Last edited by Ncognito : 01-12-2013 at 01:46 PM.
  #31  
Old 01-12-2013, 10:22 AM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by kringle77 View Post
Love the pics. Looks like you have two different 12's and two different tweets being used.
Chris, you don't miss anything!!! I have 8 working prototypes, all with different combinations of crossover components, different speakers, different horns. I'm turning into a mad professor of bass cabinet engineering!!!!!
  #32  
Old 01-12-2013, 10:25 AM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post
Chris, you don't miss anything!!! I have 8 working prototypes, all with different combinations of crossover components, different speakers, different horns. I'm turning into a mad professor of bass cabinet engineering!!!!!
Sounding good isn't good enough. It has to sound great or I'm just not satisfied. The combination I have now is absolutley killer. The 210CF is by far the best sounding, loudest, smallest 210 I've ever run across, IMHO.
  #33  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:23 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

The pic of that 2x12 stack is f'n awsome! On your page you list a few different options so, Im assuming that if someone wanted the tweets moved to the upper right corner of each cab and the handles placed at the woofer side of the cab, so as to make carrying one in each hand less cumbersome, that is do-able?
  #34  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:30 AM
bb03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by kringle77 View Post
The pic of that 2x12 stack is f'n awsome! On your page you list a few different options so, Im assuming that if someone wanted the tweets moved to the upper right corner of each cab and the handles placed at the woofer side of the cab, so as to make carrying one in each hand less cumbersome, that is do-able?
I like this excitement!

Looks like I might be getting the opportunity to pick up a "barely used" Xsonics cab from kringle in the very near future.
  #35  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:36 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

Man, Im so transparent! You know, in the rest of my life, Im very resolute and focused with what Im doing. When it comes to cabs, Im always on the hunt. But, it took a long time to find the right amp, pedals and bass too. Once I found the right ones, thats what I stick with and don't look any further. I just haven't found the right combination of tone, power and weight in a cab yet. My bass was lucky. I bought a yamaha attitude standard in 1993, loved it, bought a blue limited addition model 6 years later, a red one a few years after that, and then had stambaugh build me a custom version that made all the improvements on it that I wish yamaha had. Im looking for a cab that has the attributes of my favorite ones (d410xlt, nv610) and then makes it better. When I find that, I really don't know what I'll have to chase after. I really do like the chase though.
  #36  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:49 AM
kringle77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massena NY
Supporting Member
cab

I just listened to Ed Friedlands great review of the tc212t II and if your cab is similar but with more growl, thats awsome.
  #37  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:53 AM
Mike Arnopol's Avatar
Registered User

Builder for Audiokinesis, Big E, and Greenboy speakers
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Supporting Member
Hey Man

Wilmette here. Glad to see another crazy cab maker in the Chicago area!
  #38  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Detroit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ncognito View Post
The GB 212T is a pretty smoking cab. Guess that's why tons of them are sold. The Xsonics 212CF is a true blend in terms of sound of the Genz Benz NX2 and an Eden 210/410XLT. Very fat a huge sounding like the GB but more agressive with punch and growl like Eden.
Hey, if you're going to set the bar, you might as well put it at the top.
__________________
Graduate of the School For The Gif Ted.
  #39  
Old 01-12-2013, 01:41 PM
Banned

Owner, Xsonics Bass Cabinets
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hoffman Estates, Illinois
GOLD Supporting Member
Thumbs up Custom options

Quote:
Originally Posted by kringle77 View Post
The pic of that 2x12 stack is f'n awsome! On your page you list a few different options so, Im assuming that if someone wanted the tweets moved to the upper right corner of each cab and the handles placed at the woofer side of the cab, so as to make carrying one in each hand less cumbersome, that is do-able?
Absolutely Chris. Under "Options" I've listed several custom things I'm happy to do for those who have specific ideas as to what's best for them. In some cases it will add a few bucks.
  #40  
Old 01-12-2013, 02:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Sure would like to see some actually measurements.
Like described at AES.org
It doesn't need a special acoustic chamber, just a good PC, a Mic and some time. And a couple of "other" cabinets plotted like Bill Fitzmaurice does to show a reference.
__________________
My opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis. I analyze all factors before making a choice. I update my opinions to include new facts. Fallacies? No?
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 AM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.