| Reading idiomatic phrases vs. transcribing them
Sign in to disble this ad
In the last year or so I began transcribing and have found it to be the single most valuable tool in the woodshed. My ears are still not great compared to a very good jazz musician but I do at least a little bit every day and am learning to enjoy the work.
I'm not sure if you're familiar with David Baker's "How to Play Bebop" books but I've done a lot of studying out of them and have really learned a lot.
Lately, I've just been reading through the licks in those books for technical practice, sight-reading, and to absorb some new vocabularly. They are basically all super, super standard ideas that I think every decent improvisor is familiar with.
The transcribing has boosted my playing more than anything, and honestly I feel a little guilty from having learned so much from Baker's books. I feel that I would have learned those lessons in phrasing and note choice much more thoroughly if I picked them up from Bird records, y'know?
So my question is this: should I ditch the idea of picking up new ideas from "textbooks" and use only my ears? Or should I just stick to doing a little of both?
By the way, the new disc is fantastic. I've been listening to it for weeks and even just bought a copy for my friend. Thanks! |