Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Ask a Pro! > Ask Janek Gwizdala
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Ask Janek Gwizdala New York City bass player and record producer


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-01-2008, 10:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buffalo, New York
Reading idiomatic phrases vs. transcribing them

Sign in to disble this ad
In the last year or so I began transcribing and have found it to be the single most valuable tool in the woodshed. My ears are still not great compared to a very good jazz musician but I do at least a little bit every day and am learning to enjoy the work.

I'm not sure if you're familiar with David Baker's "How to Play Bebop" books but I've done a lot of studying out of them and have really learned a lot.

Lately, I've just been reading through the licks in those books for technical practice, sight-reading, and to absorb some new vocabularly. They are basically all super, super standard ideas that I think every decent improvisor is familiar with.

The transcribing has boosted my playing more than anything, and honestly I feel a little guilty from having learned so much from Baker's books. I feel that I would have learned those lessons in phrasing and note choice much more thoroughly if I picked them up from Bird records, y'know?

So my question is this: should I ditch the idea of picking up new ideas from "textbooks" and use only my ears? Or should I just stick to doing a little of both?

By the way, the new disc is fantastic. I've been listening to it for weeks and even just bought a copy for my friend. Thanks!
  #2  
Old 05-01-2008, 11:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
I am not familiar with David Baker's books but I am a firm believer that we should use all of our senses and not discriminate against any learning tool. Marcus Miller made an interesting comment in an interview about the lack of visual cues on recordings that are present in watching a live performance, (and specific to the interview: DVD's). That said, I agree that a cetain amount of precedence should be given to aural learning such as transcription.
  #3  
Old 05-02-2008, 06:01 PM
janekbass's Avatar
Registered User

Founder and CEO of http://videobasslessons.tv
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York/Los Angeles
Supporting Member
I think that the more you pick it up by ear the more natural it will become in your playing, and the less things you'll have to recall when playing that phrase. Everyone processes things differently of course, but I know when I've seen something in a book I see a picture of it when I'm recalling it, so it's never as natural feeling when it comes out.

I try and stick with learning things by ear, and transcribing stuff and learning it.

Easy,

Janek
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.