.045/.065/.085/.105 or .050/.070/.085/.105?

terribilino · #1 10-04-2009, 01:26 PM

I've got D'Addario round wounds on my bass, but I'm finding them a bit too thin for my tastes - especially the G string. The E string is also seems loose, which may be a set-up problem, but I'm hoping the higher gauge will tighten things up in general and make it more comfortable to play.

I got the bass used, and the previous owner had EXL 190s on it, which is .040/.060/.080/.100. I've been looking at my options, and there seem to be two medium gauges I could move up to: the EXL 165SL (045/.065/.085/.105) or the EXL 160 (.050/.070/.085/.105).

I'm tending towards the thicker EXL 160, but would that be too big a jump from the .040? I don't really have a style of playing, I'm still learning, but I'm playing along with all the motown and finger funk tunes I can find. I'm also starting to toy with slap. Would there be any reason to go for one over the other?

I've also noticed that there's a short scale, medium scale, long scale and super long scale for the EXL 160. What the hell is that all about? My bass is a Leduc, specs here: http://pagesperso-orange.fr/leduc/oldsite/en/_pad1.htm

Thanks!

becker4567 · #2 10-04-2009, 01:58 PM

hmmmm lots of questions, and you'll get lots of answers. Here's my 2 cents worth. I don't think you'll find too much difference between the strings you've metioned. A little bit, but if you want a major change in tension, try going to flats. Talkbass has a great review section here, so check it out. The scale refers to length of the neck. Short scales are usually 28"-30", medium scales (like Hofner's violin bass) is 32", long (or regular) scale is 34" and super long scale is 36" or even 38". Without getting out the metric conversion chart, your bass looks like a 34", so whatever strings you get, make sure you get the right length.

Alvaro Martín Gómez A. · #3 10-04-2009, 02:11 PM

I can feel the difference in tension between .040, .045 and .050 sets. My favorite is .045. The .040 set is great if you want to "fly" on the bass and the .050 will give you a fatter/punchier tone. Actually, lots of virtuoso players (Victor Wooten and Mark King come to mind) use very light gauge strings, which definitely help them for the kind of stuff they play.

Quote:

Originally Posted by terribilino

I don't really have a style of playing, I'm still learning

Then I recommend the .045, which is the regular/medium gauge.

knuckle_head · #4 10-04-2009, 03:39 PM

Neither set is balanced very well... the .045 is the closest of the two.

A better set would be .045 .060 .080 .105

Jaco who? · #5 10-04-2009, 04:11 PM

You might be interested in the Ken Smith Bass Burners. I hate skinny G's too, but also thick E strings. They make a 50-70-80-100 set that's intriguing, but hardly a reason in and of itself to choose a string.

terribilino · #6 10-05-2009, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by becker4567

hmmmm lots of questions, and you'll get lots of answers. Here's my 2 cents worth. I don't think you'll find too much difference between the strings you've metioned. A little bit, but if you want a major change in tension, try going to flats. Talkbass has a great review section here, so check it out. The scale refers to length of the neck. Short scales are usually 28"-30", medium scales (like Hofner's violin bass) is 32", long (or regular) scale is 34" and super long scale is 36" or even 38". Without getting out the metric conversion chart, your bass looks like a 34", so whatever strings you get, make sure you get the right length.

I'm really interested in trying out flats, so much so that I'm planning on to buying a Yamaha BB414 to put flats on. I would like to keep the round wounds on this one for slap, though. Someone in another thread ages ago said the D'Addario chromes worked just fine, so I might as well stick to them. They're easy to find where I live. The ECB82 Set Long Scale (50-105) looks like it would do the trick.

Long scale, then (860mm = 33.8583 inches).

That's important info, thanks!

Philbiker · #7 10-05-2009, 10:52 AM

Sucks with bass that strings are sooo expensive that if you make a mistake and get a set you don't like you're out $$$... I can't help except to suggest that the only way you can know for sure is to try them out. There are some sets that have a .047 G string - look for the Will Lee signature sets.

JTE · #8 10-05-2009, 01:20 PM

I used to use D'Addario 50/70/85/105 sets. I used them in the XL nickle series (XL-160), the original nickle Half-Rounds (HR-72), and the stainless (XLS-570), and the SloWound series. At some point around 1995 I tried the XL-165 specifically to balance the sound on a pre-EB StingRay. I found I really liked the 45/695/85/105 a lot better and wound up using that gauge on all my basses.

John

88ric2030 · #9 10-09-2009, 05:57 PM

Personally I use .045-.100 on al my long scales (Ric4001, Ric2030, Fender Standard Jazz) and I have .50-.105 on my short/medium scales (Danelectro Longhorn, Jay Turser Violin Bass), but I'm thinking about either .45-.100 flats or half rounds on the Beatle bass . When the G is a .40 I tend to bend the string too easy, especially when playing octaves. I also believe that the lighter gauge strings don't "sit in the mix" as well, live or studio. The sound gets a little thin and transparent.