|  | 
05-30-2005, 09:42 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL | | | 34" vs 35" Scale
Sign in to disble this ad
I am considering a new bass on noticed that some companies make a 35 1/4 scale bass. What is the benefit of the longer scale length? I'm currently playing a Fender Jazz Bass. | 
05-30-2005, 10:21 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Puerto Rico | | | for me 35,also in 4 stringer,but the most tipic is 4 strings 34 and 5 strings 35,for me this its my rule | 
05-30-2005, 10:40 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ohio | | | If you're playing a Fender, which if I remember correctly only makes 34" scale, you might want to stick with a 34" just so you can get used to the new one faster. Then again, when I got my 5-string, it has a 35" scale, and I'd come from a 34" and I transitioned fairly quickly. 35's are really more used for 5-strings though as it tends to tighen up the low B a bit. It really depends on what you're buying though, and the only way to find whats right for you is to go out and play around on everything that I can get your hands on. Good luck.
__________________
"I prefer when reality adapts itself to me, and not the other way around"
-Red Green
| 
05-31-2005, 02:40 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Las Vegas | | 35
__________________ I spend 90% of my money on women, booze, guns & guitars~ the rest I just waste. | 
05-31-2005, 06:16 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: North Dakota | | | I have 2 basses with a low B string, both are 34" scale and both sound fine. I don't believe that you need a 35" scale bass for a good B string. You just need a good bass. | 
05-31-2005, 07:11 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Edinburgh & Dundee, Scotland | | | My 4 and 5 string basses are 34, my 6 string is a 35, i dont really notice too much difference
__________________
EB Musicman/Ibanez/Ampeg/Peavey/Marshall/Tech 21
| 
05-31-2005, 08:50 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: London, UK | | | I've heard that 35' basses have a greater sustain compared to 34'. However, having played and owned plenty of basses I haven't noticed any difference at all. I think sustain usually boils down to construction of your bass (whether it's aneck through or a bolt-on) | 
05-31-2005, 07:46 PM
| | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Warwickman0810 I've heard that 35' basses have a greater sustain compared to 34'. However, having played and owned plenty of basses I haven't noticed any difference at all. I think sustain usually boils down to construction of your bass (whether it's aneck through or a bolt-on) | Ive got an ESP DF-404, 35", and neck-through, and the sustain is awesome  My first post!! | 
06-01-2005, 10:27 AM
| | David Meadows Owner: Audere Audio | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Portland OR | | | Sting tension. With a longer scale you can apply more string tension (assuming the same string width) so for example the B string on a 5 or 6 will not get floppy.
I notice the difference between 34" and a 35" scale in both tension and reach. | 
06-01-2005, 03:30 PM
|  | **** | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: west coast | | I KNOW scale length can make a difference, but all things being equal the difference between a 34" and 35" is pretty minimal. I've played 34" low B's that were great and 35" low B's that absolutely sucked, it's all in the bass. Try different basses until you find what you like, I wouldn't pay any attention to the scale length, unless it happens to be a 37" low B 
__________________ It is through creating, not possessing, that live is revealed.
RIP Jimmy
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |