Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-05-2007, 12:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Suburbs Chicago, IL
Bridge vs. Body What's the difference in tone?

Sign in to disble this ad
I recently acquired a Lakland 55-01 and man is this bass awesome. I just strung it with some Daddario EXL-170-5's as they are my present experiment changing from DR Hi-Beams which I like as well. I noticed that while trying to route thru body they come up short so bridging was the only option, no problem. However, this caused me to think.

1. What's the tonal difference routing strings thru the bridge vs. thru the body?

2. Do I need extra long scale stings if I want to route thru the body?

3. For Lakland users, what strings are you using especially for Funk, Gospel, R&B?

4. How does the B string factor into Bridge vs. Body?
__________________
Christian Praise & Worship Bassist Club Member #131, Lakland Owners Group #215, ERB Club Member #085, Carvin Club #15, Ampeg Club Member #700
  #2  
Old 06-05-2007, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Birmingham, UK
1. When you string through a body, it improves "coupling" (how easily vibrations move from the string to the rest of the bass) the result of this is not major, but the two things you get are more sustain and a tone that is more dependant the body wood (but this is not a huge difference)

2. If the normal strings arent long enough, then it would seem so!

3. I'm afraid I'm not nearly rich enough to own a Lakland!

4. The effects on the B string are the same as on the other four. (see 1)
__________________
Every ding has a story. Team Trace Elliot #3 Christian P&W bassist #97 EHX club #23 Boss rocks! club #17 British bassist #68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Relic View Post
That's your masterly-bated fish hook.
  #3  
Old 06-05-2007, 03:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Suburbs Chicago, IL
Thanks
__________________
Christian Praise & Worship Bassist Club Member #131, Lakland Owners Group #215, ERB Club Member #085, Carvin Club #15, Ampeg Club Member #700
  #4  
Old 06-06-2007, 12:21 AM
Registered User

Endorsing: Ampeg
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Apopka, FL
I wish I had a bass that let you do both. My 98 Jazz only lets you string it thru the body. I can't figure if it makes a difference or not. But it's the deepest sounding Fender unplugged that I have, and it sounds great, so I don't object.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
  #5  
Old 06-06-2007, 12:44 AM
Jeff Moote's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Niagara Falls, ON, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Jeff Moote
Supporting Member
I have basses that do one or the other as well as one that can do both. I can't hear a difference on that one when comparing with the same strings - and I'm always one to point out nuances in gear, etc. I feel that overall bridge design makes a greater impact than through-body stringing.
__________________
-Jeff

Roscoe | Rob Allen | Bergantino
  #6  
Old 06-06-2007, 09:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Suburbs Chicago, IL
Thanks for the response.
__________________
Christian Praise & Worship Bassist Club Member #131, Lakland Owners Group #215, ERB Club Member #085, Carvin Club #15, Ampeg Club Member #700
  #7  
Old 06-09-2007, 06:06 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phila,Pa.
Send a message via MSN to SGT. Pepper
In D'Addario's you need super long scale to use thru the body.
The difference lies more in the tension rather than sound. Thru the body makes them a bit tighter.
  #8  
Old 06-09-2007, 10:29 AM
Dry and Heavy
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Swiss Alps
Supporting Member
I've never been able to hear a difference either way myself..
  #9  
Old 06-09-2007, 03:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: From a place lower than low
"The difference lies more in the tension rather than sound. Thru the body makes them a bit tighter."

I disagree with this observation. The distance from the witness point on the bridge to the nut is still the same whether you string through the bridge or the body. It's not possible for them to have more tension through the body. Yes, they may feel different but that is due to other things, not tension. If the tuning posts at the headstock are farther away from the nut it will not increase tension either.
  #10  
Old 06-09-2007, 04:29 PM
Akami's Avatar
Four on the floor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 大和/Alyeska
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyM View Post
I wish I had a bass that let you do both. My 98 Jazz only lets you string it thru the body. I can't figure if it makes a difference or not. But it's the deepest sounding Fender unplugged that I have, and it sounds great, so I don't object.
There's always the Hipshot A which allows you to string either way, although you would have to drill holes.

One of Hipshot's suggested stringing methods is only running the E and A through the body.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.