Quote:
Originally Posted by king_biscuit If the strings are the same gauge, the La Bellas have higher tension than Chromes. You must be comparing a heavy set of Chromes to a light set of La Bellas. Out of the package, the La Bellas weigh more than the Chromes, and the are much stiffer (try coiling a Chrome and a Labella E-string). I love La Bellas and I'm luke warm on Chromes. |
Stiffness isn't tension. I've tried both strings on quite a few basses (I do this because Chromes sound great on some basses and less good on others, and while LaBellas always sound good, the increased upper mids of the Chromes are useful sometimes), and depending on the bass I've always noticed a bit more relief with the Chromes, or I've had to tighten the trussrod to accomodate them. This is always with the .104 760FL and the .105 Chromes set, roughly the same gauge.
The larger gauge LaBella Jamersons are a whole different kettle of fish, though. Very high tension.
[/quote]
Edit: I also wouldn't describe La Bellas as mellower than Chromes. I think the La Bellas are louder and punchier than Chromes with a less brittle high end.[/quote]
I've never noticed a loudness difference (though I'm not disputing it, I have no opinion) but the Chromes definitely have more pronounced high mids, making them brighter and on some basses very aggressive, on others just more articulate.
Sadowsky flats sound more aggressive to me than both, while being no brighter than the LaBellas.