Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-16-2011, 03:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
DR DDT's 55-115

Sign in to disble this ad
Hey, I'm thinking of getting the DR DDT strings in the 55-115 gauge. I want to go as low as possible with strings that are still capable of E Standard. Thank you for advice.
__________________
Flatwound Club #981 Progressive Rock Bass Player Club #73 Squier Classic Vibe Club #66 Brony Bassist Club #0.2
  #2  
Old 05-16-2011, 03:52 PM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: J.C. Basses
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85029
Send a message via MSN to FunkMetalBass
When you say "as low as possible", do you mean in terms of tuning or your bass' action?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by McThumpenstein View Post
I don't think the wife would buy the "I need to take off this knob and put a whole new bass under it" story.
  #3  
Old 05-16-2011, 04:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Tuning
__________________
Flatwound Club #981 Progressive Rock Bass Player Club #73 Squier Classic Vibe Club #66 Brony Bassist Club #0.2
  #4  
Old 05-16-2011, 05:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Well the 115 will be okay at E but the 55 will be stupidly tight at G, these DDT sets are very bottom light and top heavy. If you're switching between tunings you need a tension balanced set like 120 85 65 50 (equal tension on each string), this will have roughly 50 pounds per string at EADG and can be tuned as low as BEAD.
  #5  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Although a really low action would be nice too.
__________________
Flatwound Club #981 Progressive Rock Bass Player Club #73 Squier Classic Vibe Club #66 Brony Bassist Club #0.2
  #6  
Old 05-18-2011, 06:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixlramp View Post
Well the 115 will be okay at E but the 55 will be stupidly tight at G, these DDT sets are very bottom light and top heavy.
C'mon Mat, give it a break; not only the DDT's, but most sets are bottom light and top heavy.
Why?
Just because most people seem to like it that way.
Off course there are a lot of fans of balanced tension as well and you're probably the most famous exception who'll even go a step beyond to bottom heavy and top light. But that's all a matter of personal taste (and some adjusting to the music you play).

The 55 G will indeed be really tight, but there are lots of sets (Fender and GHS flats for instance) that are designed for normal tuning that come with a 55 G.

So yes, the 115 - 55 set can be used for normal tuning and you can downtune them a lot.
Wether that would be practical, I doubt.
When you change tuning that much, you have to redo your setup, probably even more than some simple tuss rod adjusting, so a second bass might be more convenient.
  #7  
Old 05-18-2011, 08:22 AM
rockstarbassist's Avatar
Banned

Endorsing Artist: HCAF
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Send a message via AIM to rockstarbassist Send a message via Yahoo to rockstarbassist
Supporting Member
I hated them. The tone was dark and not very good, and the tension felt very artificial and unnatural.

Spend about the same amount of $$ and get Circle K's instead. And this is coming from a 12+ year DR Strings user.
  #8  
Old 05-18-2011, 04:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krucial View Post
C'mon Mat, give it a break; not only the DDT's, but most sets are bottom light and top heavy.
Why?
Just because most people seem to like it that way.
Yes ... and yes agreed.

But consider that many bassists may well like it that way because that's what they're used too, that's what they started with and that's what they've always used, and why is this? ... because most sets are bottom light and top heavy. It's a cyclical thing.

When I say stupid-tight this is of course only my forthright opinion (63-67 pounds of tension).

Last edited by ixlramp : 05-18-2011 at 05:16 PM.
  #9  
Old 05-18-2011, 05:40 PM
tylerwylie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixlramp View Post
Yes ... and yes agreed.

But consider that many bassists may well like it that way because that's what they're used too, that's what they started with and that's what they've always used, and why is this? ... because most sets are bottom light and top heavy. It's a cyclical thing.

When I say stupid-tight this is of course only my forthright opinion (63-67 pounds of tension).
63-67 is stupid-tight and this is objective not subjective!

Oh wait... no it's not, but so far my only beef with Circle K's has been the tone difference on my .124 Drop C set between the C and G (CGCF tuning) strings, the .124 sounds fat as hell and that's all good for that purpose, but I found I was happier with the .112 for C if I needed the tone that came with the thinner string and if I wanted to maintain relatively good tension on my C with the rest of the strings balancing out well too. I'd be ordering .112(or .118 sometimes) .084 .061 .043 for Drop C and being happy with that. The only thing I want now are stainless steel sets! Oh, this is a problem too I think:

4 String Set - Balanced Standard 118

Price: $25.00
.118 .088 .064 .046

4 String Set - Drop Tune Standard 130

Price: $29.00
.130 .088 .064 .046

4 String Set - Balanced Standard 112

Price: $25.00
.112 .084 .061 .043

.118 .88 .64 .46 set by singles:
Subtotal $37.00
__________________
Bongo Club Member #111, Clement Bass Member #100
Genz Benz 12.0 ShuttleMax, w/ 4x10 UberBass Cab
Boss GT-10B, Sansamp RBI
Clement #255, Clement #274, Fender Aerodyne Jazz Bass, Ibanez GWB35

Last edited by tylerwylie : 05-18-2011 at 05:44 PM. Reason: Added price differences...
  #10  
Old 05-18-2011, 07:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
BoomingBass, the reason I recommended equal tension strings is because if you set max. and min. practical tensions, for example 30-50 pounds, an equal tension set gives you the largest range of retuning. However, Krucial's point about practicality is spot on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerwylie View Post
so far my only beef with Circle K's has been the tone difference on my .124 Drop C set between the C and G (CGCF tuning) strings
Yeah having 2 strings a fifth apart and at equal tension does create a big jump in gauge and therefore tone. When I first started tuning in fifths it just sounded wrong, but after a while I realised it was not a problem, I was just used to the tone jump of fourths tuning, it just took a while to acclimatise.

Apparently Circle K pricing is changing soon so that there will no longer be a price penalty for buying singles

Last edited by ixlramp : 05-18-2011 at 07:30 PM.
  #11  
Old 05-18-2011, 08:37 PM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockstarbassist View Post
I hated them. The tone was dark and not very good, and the tension felt very artificial and unnatural.

Spend about the same amount of $$ and get Circle K's instead. And this is coming from a 12+ year DR Strings user.
I really don't understand your experience with DDTs. I think they are amazing. I think it depends on your bass, I didn't love them on the spector I had, but on my modulus and fenders they are fantastic.
  #12  
Old 05-19-2011, 08:31 AM
rockstarbassist's Avatar
Banned

Endorsing Artist: HCAF
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Send a message via AIM to rockstarbassist Send a message via Yahoo to rockstarbassist
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickles View Post
I really don't understand your experience with DDTs. I think they are amazing. I think it depends on your bass, I didn't love them on the spector I had, but on my modulus and fenders they are fantastic.
I tried them on 3 different basses. Compared to the idea done right, hell even regular standard DR Lo Riders, they are terrible. It's a night and day difference between them and the CK's. I do not like or want/need that artificially high tension. Plus like I said, the tone is way, way too dark to record with. We tried it when I just put my set on, and I had to bust out my Charvel with Ernie Ball's b/c the tone was just not good at all.
Plus the B string broke upon the initial setup/install. I didn't bother asking for a replacement...

Like I said, I've been a DR user for about the last 11 years and so I know their rep. These were just horrid.
  #13  
Old 05-19-2011, 10:28 AM
tylerwylie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Supporting Member
Imagine balanced tension Fat Beams...
__________________
Bongo Club Member #111, Clement Bass Member #100
Genz Benz 12.0 ShuttleMax, w/ 4x10 UberBass Cab
Boss GT-10B, Sansamp RBI
Clement #255, Clement #274, Fender Aerodyne Jazz Bass, Ibanez GWB35
  #14  
Old 05-19-2011, 12:00 PM
rockstarbassist's Avatar
Banned

Endorsing Artist: HCAF
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Send a message via AIM to rockstarbassist Send a message via Yahoo to rockstarbassist
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerwylie View Post
Imagine balanced tension anything DR makes...
:lol: :lol:
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.