Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

View Poll Results: Which Hi Beam Low B?
.125 8 34.78%
.130 13 56.52%
Get a different set of strings for the Nordy; please post your choice 2 8.70%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
DR Hi-Beams Low B - .125 or .130?

Sign in to disble this ad
I'm going to order a set of DR Hi Beams for my Nordy vJ5, but I'm not sure which size low B to go with. I've always loved Hi Beams on my Fender Jazz, but that obviously doesn't have a low B. I hope hi beams will sound just as good on my Nordy, but is there any advantages to one size of the low B over the other?

Edit: I should mention I plan to the medium set: 45-65-85-105-?
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info

Last edited by Tony G : 09-24-2008 at 11:09 AM.
  #2  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Dakota
Supporting Member
Never tried a .130. I lik ethe .125 I have on my bass now. I've never liked heavy strings, though.
  #3  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:26 AM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
.130 might just be more boom than you're hoping for. Voted .125 for your first go-round. If that doesn't quite cut it, move up.
  #4  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:30 AM
thehurlatron's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Holland, Michigan
Supporting Member
I voted .125

IMO, I've always felt I get the nice low end, but a little more focused/controlled sound from the .125 over the .130 or .135. For me it seems the .125 is a bit more "even" with the rest of the stings. ( so no G D A E BBBBBBBBBBBB )
  #5  
Old 09-24-2008, 01:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehurlatron View Post
I voted .125

IMO, I've always felt I get the nice low end, but a little more focused/controlled sound from the .125 over the .130 or .135. For me it seems the .125 is a bit more "even" with the rest of the stings. ( so no G D A E BBBBBBBBBBBB )
Really, even with the loose tension of Hi beams? I would have thought that bringing the gauge up to .130 would help give a hi beam low B more stability and sound more focused.
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #6  
Old 09-24-2008, 02:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
I expected there to be more chatter about this topic considering it seems like one out of every 2 people here seem to use hi beams.
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #7  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
The .125 Hi-Beam is the most even, punchy B string (in the mix) on my Sadowsky J out of the different namebrands I've tried. I have not tried the .130 but don't feel the need to.
__________________
Sadowsky Club Member #60
  #8  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:20 PM
KJung's Avatar
GOLD Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheboygan, WI
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveC View Post
Never tried a .130. I lik ethe .125 I have on my bass now. I've never liked heavy strings, though.

+1 I've been using the Hi Beam .45-.125 set for quite a number of years. I kind of like the 'logical feel and extension' of the .20 increments up and down the strings. It feels and sounds like more of an extension of the E string (which I prefer at this point versus the 'watch out, he's playing the B string' monster boom). It seems easier to intonate more accurately also than the super fat ones, although that's a minor issue.

My primary basses are 34" scale, but have VERY stiff flat sawn rock maple necks (like the Nordy), and the .125 feels tight and has similar tension 'feel' to the other strings.

I'd try the .125's. If you are looking for a slightly meatier and slightly tighter feeling B, it's easy to go up to the .130 next time.

I really like that even balance though!
__________________
Ken's YouTube clips: http://www.youtube.com/Kjungbass

Last edited by KJung : 09-24-2008 at 03:24 PM.
  #9  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Portland OR
I voted other. I have been trying to like the hi-beams. I used to use them on my Modulus basses with good results but have not been liking them at all on my F bass or stingray 5. I've gone back to my beloved Blue Steels. I find they have a "springier" sound and a bit more flexible feel. I wish they offered a .130 but the .128 is OK. I find a .125 un-playable
__________________
You can say anything you want, as long as you say "I'm just saying".
  #10  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Well, I've gotten some good advice here, but I think I'm going to go the opposite way. I'm going to try the .130 first, and if it is too much I'll simply go back down to the .125.
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #11  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:39 PM
KJung's Avatar
GOLD Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheboygan, WI
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony G View Post
Well, I've gotten some good advice here, but I think I'm going to go the opposite way. I'm going to try the .130 first, and if it is too much I'll simply go back down to the .125.
In some ways, that's probably the safer bet, since most prefer a slightly 'bigger' B string. Let us know what you think.
__________________
Ken's YouTube clips: http://www.youtube.com/Kjungbass
  #12  
Old 09-24-2008, 03:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJung View Post
In some ways, that's probably the safer bet, since most prefer a slightly 'bigger' B string. Let us know what you think.
This is what I was thinking. The Low B on my MTD 635 is so close in tone and playability compared to the rest of the string on that bass, that I was kind of taken back on it. My Nordy on the other hand has a slightly more thick sounding low B, offering more of a deep pillow of bass rather than the deep roundwound growl of the MTD's low B. I like both for what they are, but sometimes favor the deep pillow (like I used to get on my old Roscoe SKB3006). But the strings I've had on my Nordy haven't quite brought me complete satisfaction as I've had everything but Hi Beams since I first got the bass.
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #13  
Old 11-21-2008, 05:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Hey Tony, any thoughts?
I'm kinda stuck deciding between 125's and 130's myself...
__________________
Sadowsky : Fender : Mesa : Epifani : Evidence Audio
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.